Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2 >

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2024, 05:19 PM
  #5671  
Moderator
 
FangsF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,812
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
​​​​​​July 2 IVD won't may not work because it's an APD holiday
​​​
Good point out, but also sometimes they go through. Several people I know got an APD to work on Christmas Day (though that’s not typical)…
FangsF15 is offline  
Old 06-10-2024, 05:28 PM
  #5672  
Roll’n Thunder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,836
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
Good point out, but also sometimes they go through. Several people I know got an APD to work on Christmas Day (though that’s not typical)…
The APD/IVD holiday blackout dates only apply if coverage is not positive. If, when PCS gets to your request, there is positive reserve coverage on the day(s) you are trying to drop, then the APD or IVD will be awarded 100% of the time. Sometimes around a holiday coverage is even or barely negative, and during the PCS run it will briefly pop positive and award someone their APD/IVD. This gives the appearance of being granted with negative coverage when actually positive coverage allowed the drop. My guess is this is what happens 99% of the time when someone gets an APD/IVD approved over a holiday blackout period. The PCS process is completely automated with no manual input from scheduling, so the company doesn't just decide one day to grant someone an APD when every day is -15.

This is also the sneaky way a junior pilot can "jump" a senior pilot when trying to drop when coverage is barely positive, since IVD's process ahead of APD's, which process ahead of PD's. Each type of drop is independent of the others and all in seniority order, so the plug in a category will get an IVD approved before the most senior pilot gets his PD processed.
tennisguru is online now  
Old 06-10-2024, 07:55 PM
  #5673  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 861
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
The APD/IVD holiday blackout dates only apply if coverage is not positive. If, when PCS gets to your request, there is positive reserve coverage on the day(s) you are trying to drop, then the APD or IVD will be awarded 100% of the time. Sometimes around a holiday coverage is even or barely negative, and during the PCS run it will briefly pop positive and award someone their APD/IVD. This gives the appearance of being granted with negative coverage when actually positive coverage allowed the drop. My guess is this is what happens 99% of the time when someone gets an APD/IVD approved over a holiday blackout period. The PCS process is completely automated with no manual input from scheduling, so the company doesn't just decide one day to grant someone an APD when every day is -15.

This is also the sneaky way a junior pilot can "jump" a senior pilot when trying to drop when coverage is barely positive, since IVD's process ahead of APD's, which process ahead of PD's. Each type of drop is independent of the others and all in seniority order, so the plug in a category will get an IVD approved before the most senior pilot gets his PD processed.
This is not correct. Please reference 23.I.10.a

They "may" deny your IVD/APD regardless of reserve coverage.
MJP27 is offline  
Old 06-11-2024, 03:28 AM
  #5674  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,238
Default

Originally Posted by MJP27
This is not correct. Please reference 23.I.10.a

They "may" deny your IVD/APD regardless of reserve coverage.
That doesn't make sense because they can't deny a PD with positive reserve coverage. So the moral of the story is submit both at the same time?
m3113n1a1 is offline  
Old 06-11-2024, 03:54 AM
  #5675  
Moderator
 
crewdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,807
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
That doesn't make sense because they can't deny a PD with positive reserve coverage. So the moral of the story is submit both at the same time?

Separate from the APD holiday discussion, just a note that I thought of as I was reading this thread (not necessarily directed at you M31). Reserve coverage rules were discussed earlier, so a quick pointer that PD's can break reserve rules (ie...drop the middle day of 3 day block) on NBs. For WB's it says such PD's "MAY" be awarded if you're dropping below the 4 days on...in 3 years on a WB, I never had one honored, even with positive coverage. While no categories currently have a MSL, if it does have one, you can't PD to go below the MSL either. I think the 350 was the last fleet we had MSL, and it was 9 days. So you could bid reserve blocks less than 9 days, but if you were awarded a block 9 days or more, you couldn't PD to go below that. At least that's the way it was explained to me as I never had to deal with it.

A friend of a friend found out about these rules the hard way. On the 717, he would drop the middle day of reserve blocks all the time. Wanting to make more cash, he jumped up to the 7ER thinking he'd continue the game and that is when he found out about this language...ouch.



PWA 23.I.9
crewdawg is offline  
Old 06-11-2024, 03:55 AM
  #5676  
Roll’n Thunder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,836
Default

Originally Posted by MJP27
This is not correct. Please reference 23.I.10.a

They "may" deny your IVD/APD regardless of reserve coverage.
Functionally I am correct. An APD/IVD will process if coverage is positive. I’ve done this over holiday blackout periods a handful of times. Again, PCS is entirely automated. Scheduling can’t go in and cherry pick a few random people to award APDs to and deny others. The company MIGHT be able to tell the automation to deny all APD/IVD requests regardless of positive coverage, but as was said above that doesn’t make any sense since people can still PD at will over any day of the year with positive coverage so the end staffing result will be the same.
tennisguru is online now  
Old 06-11-2024, 06:20 AM
  #5677  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,597
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq
That's because you were banking credit. It's semantics but there is a big difference. Pay is pay but credit is paid based on the pay rate at which you pull out the credit. That could be very lucrative if you banked credit as an FO and then pull it out as a Captain under a new (and hopefully increased) PWA rate.
Exactly my point. To be fair however banking credit can cost you when a airline is displacing not growing.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-11-2024, 07:07 AM
  #5678  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 861
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
Functionally I am correct. An APD/IVD will process if coverage is positive. I’ve done this over holiday blackout periods a handful of times. Again, PCS is entirely automated. Scheduling can’t go in and cherry pick a few random people to award APDs to and deny others. The company MIGHT be able to tell the automation to deny all APD/IVD requests regardless of positive coverage, but as was said above that doesn’t make any sense since people can still PD at will over any day of the year with positive coverage so the end staffing result will be the same.
I have had an APD denied in the exact scenario you describe. I've also had it approved. So, I know they can deny it if they so desire. I'm glad it's worked out every time for you. I haven't had 100% success rate.
MJP27 is offline  
Old 06-11-2024, 09:31 AM
  #5679  
Roll’n Thunder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,836
Default

Originally Posted by MJP27
I have had an APD denied in the exact scenario you describe. I've also had it approved. So, I know they can deny it if they so desire. I'm glad it's worked out every time for you. I haven't had 100% success rate.
How positive was the coverage?
tennisguru is online now  
Old 06-11-2024, 12:23 PM
  #5680  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 861
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
How positive was the coverage?
lol. Unfortunately my memory isn't that great and it didn't happen recently. However, coverage was positive. Can't remember what the reasons report said exactly either.
MJP27 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boog123
Delta
6
07-14-2016 11:26 AM
iahflyr
Major
27
09-30-2014 09:04 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices