Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2
#3771
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,418
Easiet is to call scheds and just ask them to confirm that the rotation you have on your schedule now is in fact your 23K recovery rotation due to the cancelled leg IROP....if they say yes, then it's legit...I would acknowlege right away.
They can't make a 2nd change (double 23K) unless they invoke travel waivers and name the airports that are affected.
#3772
EOY 25, assuming no early retirements, I'm 53%.
I get to 40% in 2030 but then it goes very, very slow for me after that, because all but the youngest pre 9/11 hires will be aged out. I retire around 2700. IF I make it to 65. I likely will not based on family medical history, relatively severe injuries I have had, and a cardiac SI that is one bad EKG away from "you never fly again".
So for guys like me, who are already well into our 40s, (50 is closer than 40 now) a couple years going to say 10% of current progression NOW makes a big difference.. Because I'm not likely to see 67 other than 50% of my high 12 in 36.
I'm currently 80% on NYC ER. As of now I move about 5% a year until any realistic retirement of the category, (2032) and retire around 15% in seat. 2 years stopping basically means losing a fair amount of movement now. Now closer to the end of my career, where I'm only moving 1-2% a year once all but the anomalously young of the pre-2014 hires are retired (a TON of the 2014-17 hires are younger than me) it wouldn't affect me as much being stuck at 18% when I was only gonna pick up 3 more percent between 60 and 65. I will never see a "true widebody" save as the plug my last couple years. So the ER is as good as it gets for me.
And all these number I just pulled from the ALPA dashboard so it's not just me blowing smoke out my posterior.
#3773
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 1,566
if it was not meant as a disparaging comment I apologize.
as for the second paragraph, a section 3 focused negotiation could have yielded more money, sure. But a major complaint from many NB pilots was QOL. Our NC split the effort across QOL and pay. I can tell you right now if you gave me our TA as presented or a 30% raise DOS with none of the soft pay/ QOL changes I would take our current TA. But that’s just me.
as for the second paragraph, a section 3 focused negotiation could have yielded more money, sure. But a major complaint from many NB pilots was QOL. Our NC split the effort across QOL and pay. I can tell you right now if you gave me our TA as presented or a 30% raise DOS with none of the soft pay/ QOL changes I would take our current TA. But that’s just me.
#3775
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 1,566
#3776
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,609
#3777
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,840
I’ve never said you owe me anything, as you’ll see in the post you quoted.
#3778
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 1,566
I do understand my statement was a tad oversimplified, and out of the posters in the close to retirement cohort, you are probably the most civil with well thought out arguments/opinions versus some of the other guys who are "we suffered, you must suffer WORSE, but your suffering WILL NEVER COUNT" (again, hyperbole a bit, but you see where I am aiming that)
That said, regardless of how bottom end scope got here, it really, really affected the careers of guys who are in the late 30s to early 50s age cohort. Civilian side, guys who were expecting to do 2-3 years as a regional FO then 2-3 CAPT then on to the majors by 30, were FOs for 10+ years. Guys like me who were military and in the olden times would have gone right from being a current/flying pilot, and go to a major with maybe a year of guard bumming / 91 / 135 between, werent' even able to get on with all but the sketchiest/lowest paying regionals. I worked on an oil rig and on piplelines.
But NB and some others on the FB pages basically poo-pooh any career downs we had experienced via 9/11, BK, Mergers, 65 because we weren't suffereing while on the DL/NW Seniority List.
That said, regardless of how bottom end scope got here, it really, really affected the careers of guys who are in the late 30s to early 50s age cohort. Civilian side, guys who were expecting to do 2-3 years as a regional FO then 2-3 CAPT then on to the majors by 30, were FOs for 10+ years. Guys like me who were military and in the olden times would have gone right from being a current/flying pilot, and go to a major with maybe a year of guard bumming / 91 / 135 between, werent' even able to get on with all but the sketchiest/lowest paying regionals. I worked on an oil rig and on piplelines.
But NB and some others on the FB pages basically poo-pooh any career downs we had experienced via 9/11, BK, Mergers, 65 because we weren't suffereing while on the DL/NW Seniority List.
#3780
To truly understand what happened post 9/11 I guess you had to be here in the industry at the time. I don't mean to be condescending with that comment, it's just the reality of times we faced. We had bankruptcies, aweful economy, all sorts of things and external pressures affecting us at that time. We did have to make concessions. So did many others. The fact we gave on scope was just fall out from all of the additive effects from the world situation. We did not have any very good options at that time. Mind you this went on for almost a decade. So yes, sorry we did what we did however there were no decent off ramps during those times. I don't want to put words in your mouth, but I would be curious to see how you guys would react if a similar situation presented itself. It's easy to toss stones at us, but you were not here and did not face the decisions we all had to make at that time. We were definately in survival mode. Not just here at DAL but UAL AA etc.
I wasn't in 121 on 9/11, but I have been flying since 1994.
And spend a lot more of my 20s than planned in the middle east only to be thrown out on the street as Iraq was "ending" while having the worst pilot hiring market in years. One thing that a lot of people don't often realize unless they lived the whole shebang, was how damn long Afghanistan lasted. It was longer than Vietnam, and that's counting the first nine years where we were "Advisors" and not a hot war. Me and a lot of my friends were on AD on 9/11, we got IA'd, GSA'd, then Stop-Lossed, followed by on the street with 6 months notice when it was politically convienient then recalled from the IRR.. Again, not 121, but a bunch of us did that, only to be on our asses in our 30s doing crap jobs to maybe get on with a major in our late 30s if we were lucky.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post