Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2 >

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2023, 03:50 PM
  #3621  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by tripled
thank you. Pay banding is a concession and it’s puzzling why so many want it. Guess they never expect/hope to be sr in any category ever.
Pay banding should be nothing more than a bridge to longevity pay.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 12-14-2023, 03:53 PM
  #3622  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,681
Default

Originally Posted by Gspeed
It’s a concession if you don’t capture substantial credit for the headcount savings for what you just gave them.
how many people do you think bid from 737 to the 320 for the pay rate. My bet is pretty close to 0. And I’d be willing to bet no one bids from the 717 to the 220 for the pay.

with that in mind I would think getting the NEO rate for all 737 and 320 variants would be more beneficial to the pilot group as a whole vs keeping the 737/319/320/321CEO at a rate $10-$12 dollars an hour lower on the CA side.
Gone Flying is offline  
Old 12-14-2023, 04:00 PM
  #3623  
Moderator
 
crewdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,896
Default

Originally Posted by tripled
thank you. Pay banding is a concession and it’s puzzling why so many want it. Guess they never expect/hope to be sr in any category ever.

Someone will have to be senior. I'm fairly senior already, but I'd wager that if the 717 was banded with the 220, my seniority raise wouldn't be impacted at all. Even today, once you get above 30%, it's a slow rise.



Originally Posted by Gone Flying
how many people do you think bid from 737 to the 320 for the pay rate. My bet is pretty close to 0. And I’d be willing to bet no one bids from the 717 to the 220 for the pay.


This right here.
crewdawg is offline  
Old 12-14-2023, 04:56 PM
  #3624  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 900
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
Pay banding should be nothing more than a bridge to longevity pay.
Agreed. UPS set the bar on this and the industry should be moving in that direction.
myrkridia is offline  
Old 12-14-2023, 04:59 PM
  #3625  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,681
Default

Originally Posted by myrkridia
Agreed. UPS set the bar on this and the industry should be moving in that direction.
UPS flies 80+% widebodies and yet pays about the same as we pay 757 and a321NEO pilots. No thanks

Id rather keep our pay by AC type.
Gone Flying is offline  
Old 12-14-2023, 05:04 PM
  #3626  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 287
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
to my knowledge united is the only major pax carrier with a 6th week of vacation and they get theirs at 25 years of service.

UA’s vacation
years 1-4 2 weeks
years 5-10 3 weeks
years 11-24 5 weeks
years 25+ 6 weeks

I understand where scoop is coming from, but we had a long way to go in getting our vacation up. If we had left week 5 at year 19, week 6 probably would not have happened until close to year 30, which a lot of our list will never see.
I heard in olden times vacation maxed out at 7 weeks. Can anyone confirm this?
Forgotmyhat is offline  
Old 12-14-2023, 05:06 PM
  #3627  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 900
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
UPS flies 80+% widebodies and yet pays about the same as we pay 757 and a321NEO pilots. No thanks

Id rather keep our pay by AC type.
You would rather our earnings be based on the type of flying that the whims of network decides? United pilots out earn us almost exclusively because of the size of their WB fleet. If we were all on the same pay rate, we wouldn't have to care nearly as much about the current lack of WB on order.
myrkridia is offline  
Old 12-14-2023, 05:12 PM
  #3628  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Big ones
Posts: 792
Default

Originally Posted by myrkridia
You would rather our earnings be based on the type of flying that the whims of network decides? United pilots out earn us almost exclusively because of the size of their WB fleet. If we were all on the same pay rate, we wouldn't have to care nearly as much about the current lack of WB on order.
pay banding eliminates choices. Let those who want to chase money do so; others may not.
tripled is offline  
Old 12-14-2023, 05:21 PM
  #3629  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: MD-88 FO
Posts: 1,572
Default

Originally Posted by tripled
pay banding eliminates choices. Let those who want to chase money do so; others may not.
Thats a pretty narrow view of things. If one didn’t have to chase money then they could chase quality of life and open up a whole new bevy of choices, no?
Myfingershurt is online now  
Old 12-14-2023, 05:29 PM
  #3630  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,681
Default

Originally Posted by tripled
pay banding eliminates choices. Let those who want to chase money do so; others may not.
i agree. I don’t mind banding aircraft together that are similar like the 320 and 737, but we should definitely keep a few bands. It allows pilots to choose money vs relative seniority. Plus the training churn is also a win for pilots.
Gone Flying is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boog123
Delta
6
07-14-2016 12:26 PM
iahflyr
Major
27
09-30-2014 10:04 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 07:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 10:14 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 05:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices