Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2
#341
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Road construction signholder
Posts: 2,439
Correct. Three days of CQ are no different than three on call days. The only reason CQ is in the spreadsheet at all is because it boosts the pay above the reserve guarantee. In fact if you also use John's Reserve Line Simulator (another great spreadsheet) it even specifically states "CQ does not count against X days."
#342
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,258
Ya think retro for retirees will face any headwinds from ALPA negotiators because ALPA MAY not be able to get their 1.8% on the retiree retro payout?
From ALPA's perspective(follow the $$$), if it paid out as a signing bonus ALPA gets their cut..... yes, I know it sounds cynical, and I'm not castigating ALPA by any means, but after safety, $$$ comes into play somewhere in the ALPA calculus.
Hopefully, I'm wrong
From ALPA's perspective(follow the $$$), if it paid out as a signing bonus ALPA gets their cut..... yes, I know it sounds cynical, and I'm not castigating ALPA by any means, but after safety, $$$ comes into play somewhere in the ALPA calculus.
Hopefully, I'm wrong
#343
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2019
Posts: 93
Ya think retro for retirees will face any headwinds from ALPA negotiators because ALPA MAY not be able to get their 1.8% on the retiree retro payout?
From ALPA's perspective(follow the $$$), if it paid out as a signing bonus ALPA gets their cut..... yes, I know it sounds cynical, and I'm not castigating ALPA by any means, but after safety, $$$ comes into play somewhere in the ALPA calculus.
Hopefully, I'm wrong
From ALPA's perspective(follow the $$$), if it paid out as a signing bonus ALPA gets their cut..... yes, I know it sounds cynical, and I'm not castigating ALPA by any means, but after safety, $$$ comes into play somewhere in the ALPA calculus.
Hopefully, I'm wrong
#344
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,017
Ya think retro for retirees will face any headwinds from ALPA negotiators because ALPA MAY not be able to get their 1.8% on the retiree retro payout?
From ALPA's perspective(follow the $$$), if it paid out as a signing bonus ALPA gets their cut..... yes, I know it sounds cynical, and I'm not castigating ALPA by any means, but after safety, $$$ comes into play somewhere in the ALPA calculus.
Hopefully, I'm wrong
From ALPA's perspective(follow the $$$), if it paid out as a signing bonus ALPA gets their cut..... yes, I know it sounds cynical, and I'm not castigating ALPA by any means, but after safety, $$$ comes into play somewhere in the ALPA calculus.
Hopefully, I'm wrong
Call my naïve, but I think you’re wrong. I hope you’re wrong.
#345
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,258
I’m trying to put myself in the shoes of a member of the MEC or the negotiating committee. In no way whatsoever am I concerned about increasing the take for ALPA. It’s not like the budget is hurting and clearly I wouldn’t get any personal cut myself.
Call my naïve, but I think you’re wrong. I hope you’re wrong.
Call my naïve, but I think you’re wrong. I hope you’re wrong.
I don't lose any sleep over it, I can't control it...just musing by me.
#349
Ya think retro for retirees will face any headwinds from ALPA negotiators because ALPA MAY not be able to get their 1.8% on the retiree retro payout?
From ALPA's perspective(follow the $$$), if it paid out as a signing bonus ALPA gets their cut..... yes, I know it sounds cynical, and I'm not castigating ALPA by any means, but after safety, $$$ comes into play somewhere in the ALPA calculus.
Hopefully, I'm wrong
From ALPA's perspective(follow the $$$), if it paid out as a signing bonus ALPA gets their cut..... yes, I know it sounds cynical, and I'm not castigating ALPA by any means, but after safety, $$$ comes into play somewhere in the ALPA calculus.
Hopefully, I'm wrong
#350
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Usually, bonuses are $ to incentivize the voters to vote yes.
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 05-11-2022 at 05:15 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post