Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2 >

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2023, 06:22 AM
  #3101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 670
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
Lots of thrust, very little vector in this post. What specifically should be done, legally, by the union? And I find your hatred of DH pretty rich. You claim that he's bitter because he's a north guy who got hosed in the merger but somehow he's also pro-company and teaming up with C44 (the most RD of all delta pilots) to get screwed more?

Also, the random ad hominem about half this pilot group, most of which has dealt with regional airline management somehow being naively complicit in....returning this company to the poor working conditions of their former employer they just left?

But hey. It wouldn't be an anti-DALPA post without someone bringing up Lee Moak, for some reason. All we need in our DPA bingo card is the "Sane email" and the black shirts to really complete the line.
Typical "rebuttal" from you. Pretty much what everyone expected. Thanks for that.
Nick Bradshaw is offline  
Old 10-18-2023, 06:29 AM
  #3102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,518
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Bradshaw
Typical "rebuttal" from you. Pretty much what everyone expected. Thanks for that.
Sure. Don't engage. Just Rage.
CBreezy is online now  
Old 10-18-2023, 06:44 AM
  #3103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 670
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
Sure. Don't engage. Just Rage.
Another classic CB soundbite that feels good to say, but in reality, means nothing. This is like watching MS. NBC. But by all means keep that post count going. I'm sure we're all very impressed.

Maybe we should elect MEC chairman based on who has the highest APC post count in the Delta forum. CB for MEC chair!
Nick Bradshaw is offline  
Old 10-18-2023, 06:49 AM
  #3104  
Moderator
 
crewdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,807
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
Disagree. It might have been slightly more disruptive but they had carte blanche to use 23m7 and they were using it liberally without any real consequences. Maybe 1/3 of the penalty was being recovered. And pilots who should have been getting double pay were often getting nothing because of all the people fishing for batch sizes and m7 pay. A not insignificant amount of people were being harmed. Getting rid of batch sizes stopped the absurd practice of calling to get IA that was going on.
I mean, they've shown that they feel they get to pick and choose how to interpret the pwa in their favor, so I'm not sure why we'd think they actually follow their promise.
crewdawg is offline  
Old 10-18-2023, 06:50 AM
  #3105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 670
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg
I mean, they've shown that they feel they get to pick and choose how to interpret the pwa in their favor, so I'm not sure why we'd think they actually follow their promise.
Exactly.

Filler
Nick Bradshaw is offline  
Old 10-18-2023, 06:51 AM
  #3106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,016
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg
I mean, they've shown that they feel they get to pick and choose how to interpret the pwa in their favor, so I'm not sure why we'd think they actually follow their promise.
They made us change our agreement by violating our PWA so egregiously that we didn’t have a choice. Bad precedent was set. Now we’re seeing them try same strategy on other sections all at same time.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 10-18-2023, 06:56 AM
  #3107  
Moderator
 
crewdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,807
Default

Originally Posted by All 5 Stages
It was my understanding that, in return for unlimited batch sizes, the company promised to abide by the promises in the PWA.

A5S

​​​​​​​Lol right!
crewdawg is offline  
Old 10-18-2023, 07:24 AM
  #3108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 930
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
Disagree. It might have been slightly more disruptive but they had carte blanche to use 23m7 and they were using it liberally without any real consequences. Maybe 1/3 of the penalty was being recovered. And pilots who should have been getting double pay were often getting nothing because of all the people fishing for batch sizes and m7 pay. A not insignificant amount of people were being harmed. Getting rid of batch sizes stopped the absurd practice of calling to get IA that was going on.
Management now looks at two data points to celebrate the extent to which they duped the MEC: average time to cover a trip (with no available reserves), and average pay hour multiple paid per premium trip covered.

Fixing the 23M7 debacle for the company brought both numbers down, saving the company millions and eliminating operational issues. The MEC squandered millions of dollars in contractual leverage by giving it away. Management successfully pulled off a terrific gaslighting job.

It’s also important to remember that not EVERY trip being covered had a rogue pilot waiting in the shadows to call scheduling and snipe the trip out of seniority. It was not uncommon to see trip coverage take up to 24 hours previously. Today, the vast majority of premium trips are covered in under 1 hour. We streamlined the operation massively, saving the company millions, at no cost to them.
ancman is offline  
Old 10-18-2023, 07:31 AM
  #3109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,518
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
They made us change our agreement by violating our PWA so egregiously that we didn’t have a choice. Bad precedent was set. Now we’re seeing them try same strategy on other sections all at same time.
They weren't violating the contract. 23M7 was permitted even though what they were doing wasn't past precedent. I think we should have gotten more for it and more guardrails but, as summer some of your reps and CA said, we were negotiating from a position of strength and risked losing worse than the RJ arbitration.
CBreezy is online now  
Old 10-18-2023, 07:33 AM
  #3110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 930
Default

Originally Posted by All 5 Stages
It was my understanding that, in return for unlimited batch sizes, the company promised to abide by the promises in the PWA.

A5S
In that case, I’ll go ahead and offer the company that I follow the FOM while I’m at work, only if they agree to pay me double.
ancman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boog123
Delta
6
07-14-2016 11:26 AM
iahflyr
Major
27
09-30-2014 09:04 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices