Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2 >

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2022, 05:55 PM
  #291  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,891
Default

Originally Posted by Bainite
Only if the pilots vote yes for that. I wouldn't.
Many will say this, but often it gets lost in the overall value of the deal presented:

The longer Delta stalls, the more new hires and junior pilots that can be wooed by the lure of a signing bonus that could/would be bigger than any retro they'd otherwise get. The more distant the memories of past VEOP and retired pilots become. The bigger the "signing bonus" the more people that will be swayed by the overall deal in the end and an otherwise great contract that doesn't have full retro, but some significant recognition of the delayed negotiations will pass.
nene is offline  
Old 05-08-2022, 07:32 PM
  #292  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 52
Default

Originally Posted by Abouttime2fish
They could do something like 20% day of signing with full retro, 20% 1Jan23, 10% in the out years.
My napkin math on retro on a 20% raise is around a 1.5 billion dollar check and counting as time goes on. I hope it happens. That's the kind of raise we need after this much time and inflation and I don't want to incentivize dragging out negotiations in the future but that's a large amount of money for one item. I don't envy the position the negotiating committee is in.
Owlchemist is offline  
Old 05-08-2022, 08:35 PM
  #293  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 861
Default

Originally Posted by Owlchemist
My napkin math on retro on a 20% raise is around a 1.5 billion dollar check and counting as time goes on. I hope it happens. That's the kind of raise we need after this much time and inflation and I don't want to incentivize dragging out negotiations in the future but that's a large amount of money for one item. I don't envy the position the negotiating committee is in.
I get what you're saying but at some point that $ number gets too big for the company to write a check and still give us the other contract improvements we want.
MJP27 is online now  
Old 05-08-2022, 09:19 PM
  #294  
Gets Weekends Off
 
20Fathoms's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,014
Default

Originally Posted by MJP27
I get what you're saying but at some point that $ number gets too big for the company to write a check and still give us the other contract improvements we want.
Yep, exactly. At which point the company pops the champagne and says “That actually worked! Let’s drag it out even longer next time.”

We set a precedent last time with full retro. Let’s not throw that away and set a different one this time.
20Fathoms is offline  
Old 05-08-2022, 09:57 PM
  #295  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 861
Default

Originally Posted by 20Fathoms
Yep, exactly. At which point the company pops the champagne and says “That actually worked! Let’s drag it out even longer next time.”

We set a precedent last time with full retro. Let’s not throw that away and set a different one this time.
Ok, how large of a day one check is Delta going to be able to write? Is there a limit? 1.5B, 3B, 5B? I mean you can't possibly think there is no expiration date on meaningful retro....
MJP27 is online now  
Old 05-08-2022, 10:17 PM
  #296  
Gets Weekends Off
 
20Fathoms's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,014
Default

Originally Posted by MJP27
Ok, how large of a day one check is Delta going to be able to write? Is there a limit? 1.5B, 3B, 5B? I mean you can't possibly think there is no expiration date on meaningful retro....
Correct I don’t think that, and to answer your question I’m not sure but there obviously is a limit when the principle is taken to extremes. Nobody is cutting a check for 5 billion. My point is if we simply yield for pennies on the dollar and a “bonus”, the company would have to be idiotic to give us an on-time contract in the future. Why would they?
20Fathoms is offline  
Old 05-09-2022, 05:26 AM
  #297  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 451
Default

My guess is a signing bonus of 30% of your previous years gross pay. With a minimum for new hires.
RAH RAH REE is offline  
Old 05-09-2022, 05:41 AM
  #298  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,237
Default

Originally Posted by Owlchemist
My napkin math on retro on a 20% raise is around a 1.5 billion dollar check and counting as time goes on. I hope it happens. That's the kind of raise we need after this much time and inflation and I don't want to incentivize dragging out negotiations in the future but that's a large amount of money for one item. I don't envy the position the negotiating committee is in.
Not sure what went into your "napkin math", but I feel, a "fair" retro might be something like 5% for 2019 W-2, 2% for 2020 and 2021, 6% for 2022 and then however much negotiations can achieve for 2023. IOW basically a COLA for those past years for anyone who had a delta W-2. Giving a signing bonus to new hires that redistributes those COLA increases to pilots that weren't even on the property those years or a signing bonus to someone who has been on the property for 1 day doesn't seem equitable.

What would be your napkin math on something like that? Just because the company is/was short of funds(2020-2022 they still owe the rent payment and will need to amortize that out over the coming years. JMHO
Buck Rogers is offline  
Old 05-09-2022, 05:45 AM
  #299  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,237
Default

Originally Posted by RAH RAH REE
My guess is a signing bonus of 30% of your previous years gross pay. With a minimum for new hires.
So, just "too bad" for the 3000+ pilots that retired over that time? Or, possibly retired 1 day prior to contract signing? To me that doesn't seem very fair, but I may have a vested interest. Just curious what your thoughts are
Buck Rogers is offline  
Old 05-09-2022, 05:47 AM
  #300  
Stands to be Corrected
 
Breadcream's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Position: C-17 / 7ER
Posts: 323
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
Not sure what went into your "napkin math", but I feel, a "fair" retro might be something like 5% for 2019 W-2, 2% for 2020 and 2021, 6% for 2022 and then however much negotiations can achieve for 2023. IOW basically a COLA for those past years for anyone who had a delta W-2. Giving a signing bonus to new hires that redistributes those COLA increases to pilots that weren't even on the property those years or a signing bonus to someone who has been on the property for 1 day doesn't seem equitable.

What would be your napkin math on something like that? Just because the company is/was short of funds(2020-2022 they still owe the rent payment and will need to amortize that out over the coming years. JMHO
I thought retro pay meant they’ll cut us a check for the difference between our new rate and the previous rate…totaled from 2019 to the day we sign.

Am I wrong? First time dealing with this…
Breadcream is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boog123
Delta
6
07-14-2016 11:26 AM
iahflyr
Major
27
09-30-2014 09:04 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices