Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2
#1981
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 861
Another wild card is that this is the first AE all the MOAB pilots (covid displacement) and most of 2021-2022s newhires have been unlocked for. That will also make things go more senior. I think many of these pilots want the WBs but were seat locked out, and that's the reason it's been going to newhires. This drought maximized those seat locks too.
#1982
Yes and no on COVID displacements. Many already took upgrades, and also there were a few bids where people were released from seatlocks for WB needs in bases other than ATL (and even in ATL going from ER to 765). Also when people came back from UNA, I know quite a few that didn’t bid on that first one after, and thus didn’t incur a seat lock coming off UNA. I’d wager there were less than 50% left that actually had seat locks (totally unscientific).
#1983
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 273
Potential new guy here trying to gauge QOL on NB fleets in ATL. Through the widget seniority website I see that the junior CA's in ATL have been with y'all about a year. With the current pace of hiring, should I expect that to be similar for someone hired this summer? Is the new contract expected to have an effect on NB upgrade times? As an FO or a junior CA, what are reserve times like, and how long before you're not working every weekend? Have used the search function but haven't found much too much that addresses that specifically, updated for mid 2023. Thanks!
#1986
I think the next AE will have good movement. The 330 category will be senior in both seats. 350B will be the junior WBB seat. 320A will go senior to 7ERA, 73NA, and top end will be senior in 717A in ATL, with bottom being filled by junior (potential)CA’s missing by %bids. Many locks were released on 4/1 from the post COVID bid. I’ll personally likely move and those I know in the same realm will be doing the same. There’s a group in the 8000-10500 realm who got locked with a COVID release bid that now can move freely to WBB (seams the mainstay) or saying “I’ll just upgrade, if seniority works for xy%)”. It’ll be interesting. Lots of WBA retirements with deliveries on the NB side, plus reactivations on the 717 side in ATL and DTW. Being that hiring continues, retirements continue, and we keep bringing on jets, the math works for movement. The new PWA (contract) alone requires more staffing for the same flying. Still optimistically curious (if that’s a term) how this will play out, especially with SLI’s (sim instructors) sent to the line for summer, but needing to bolster the rosters for available pilots with new PWA language that hits in august. We either get paid a lot more to fly NB rotations as built OR we need many more pilots to build normal trips without pay additions for working harder. Chicken vs egg argument. Only a few months away to see the sodomizer results. We either get pilots and normal pairings or pay for complaining.
#1987
30/168 Rest & CQ
Let's say CQ ends with a D period. Travel day back to base the following day. Reserve days after that.
Because of flying before CQ, there is a need for 30 hours of rest in 168 hours.
Is the rest able to start 10 hours after the sim session ends (i.e. around 08:00 the following morning) and then go for 30 hours, despite the pilot's travel back to base being during that time?
Travel to base within the 30/168 rest is okay because it's not FDP...but it's not free from company obligations either.
Anyone had this?
Because of flying before CQ, there is a need for 30 hours of rest in 168 hours.
Is the rest able to start 10 hours after the sim session ends (i.e. around 08:00 the following morning) and then go for 30 hours, despite the pilot's travel back to base being during that time?
Travel to base within the 30/168 rest is okay because it's not FDP...but it's not free from company obligations either.
Anyone had this?
#1988
Let's say CQ ends with a D period. Travel day back to base the following day. Reserve days after that.
Because of flying before CQ, there is a need for 30 hours of rest in 168 hours.
Is the rest able to start 10 hours after the sim session ends (i.e. around 08:00 the following morning) and then go for 30 hours, despite the pilot's travel back to base being during that time?
Travel to base within the 30/168 rest is okay because it's not FDP...but it's not free from company obligations either.
Anyone had this?
Because of flying before CQ, there is a need for 30 hours of rest in 168 hours.
Is the rest able to start 10 hours after the sim session ends (i.e. around 08:00 the following morning) and then go for 30 hours, despite the pilot's travel back to base being during that time?
Travel to base within the 30/168 rest is okay because it's not FDP...but it's not free from company obligations either.
Anyone had this?
#1989
Roll’n Thunder
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,836
Let's say CQ ends with a D period. Travel day back to base the following day. Reserve days after that.
Because of flying before CQ, there is a need for 30 hours of rest in 168 hours.
Is the rest able to start 10 hours after the sim session ends (i.e. around 08:00 the following morning) and then go for 30 hours, despite the pilot's travel back to base being during that time?
Travel to base within the 30/168 rest is okay because it's not FDP...but it's not free from company obligations either.
Anyone had this?
Because of flying before CQ, there is a need for 30 hours of rest in 168 hours.
Is the rest able to start 10 hours after the sim session ends (i.e. around 08:00 the following morning) and then go for 30 hours, despite the pilot's travel back to base being during that time?
Travel to base within the 30/168 rest is okay because it's not FDP...but it's not free from company obligations either.
Anyone had this?
#1990
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: NYC 330
Posts: 477
are you sure about this? I was a 1997 hire at NWA and it was a huge year for us…memory could be off however
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post