Search

Notices

Pilot morale

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2022, 07:41 AM
  #171  
Roll’n Thunder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,850
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
Best thing about CLE is the Taco Bell cantina
This.


filler
tennisguru is online now  
Old 03-23-2022, 08:02 AM
  #172  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Taxi Driver
Posts: 414
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Spot on. The 73 outside of ATL is really good flying. 1 to 2 legs a day for the most part and great layovers. I agree completely that a lot of the angst is from the 88 affect. It's a big shock factor doing 1-2 legs a day for years and then thrown into endless RJ flying like what has happened to the 7ER(Official plane of Florida) and the 320(basically the new 88). The introduction of the NEO should improve things for the 320 while likely having very negative consequences for the 7ER. Furthermore, if Delta introduces the MAX to the fleet the 7ER fleet's longer stage length flights will virtually be limited to 767 international and specific routes that require 757 performance (St. Thomas, Quito, Tegucigalpa etc)

Brave New World. Ironically after yelling at the top of their lungs for years about being RJ flying inhouse Mainline pilots are finally getting their wish but now are in an uproar about the schedules.

Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk

As a 73 pilot not based in Atlanta I can tell you that this is inaccurate. Lots of multiple leg days, which I wouldn't mind so much if we didn't change planes so often, long sits in places with no pilot lounges, and short layovers in crummy hotels. Happy to have more flying at mainline, but that doesn't mean we should settle for a total destruction to our QOL. To pretend that things are all rosy and then blame the pilot group is just carrying management's water, especially during negotiations for a new contract.
Spudhauler is offline  
Old 03-23-2022, 08:08 AM
  #173  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hrkdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Fairly local
Posts: 1,472
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer;[url=tel:3391836
3391836[/url]]No, we still get the ACARS with the extension. I got one last week. It's pretty clear in the ACARS you can extend or decline the extension, if you are extending, you just have to ACARS back before you land. IF you're declining, then of course you have to decline it then, because you can't aren't going then.
Interesting. I didn’t get an ACARS a coupes weeks ago, although it was a strange setup.

On our last flight of the day we had to divert to the alternate. No ACARS on the way to the alternate nor when we initialized for the leg back to the original destination.

Although we knew we were extending, the only indication from the company was on the LATT worksheet on the flight plan addendum. The LATT for “without extension” was blank and the “with extension” had the correct time.
Hrkdrivr is offline  
Old 03-23-2022, 08:12 AM
  #174  
Gets Weekends Off
 
saturn's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: Supreme Allied Commander
Posts: 1,074
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Not that long ago a big complaint was that we needed trips like SW because guys wanted to work fewer days. Our trip value per day is much better now than pre 2016 but now the trips are to hard.
SWA doesn't have a fleet like ours, thier network is P2P not hub n' spoke, don't fly redeyes, much lower avg stage, intentionally tight turn times & higher untilization, etc. Much easier to cram more legs per duty than at DL. If we cut & pasted their workrules, we still couldn't replicate their schedules. You know this.

I'd argue since 2018 we haven't seen much increase in value per day, just increased productivity for siimilar pay. NB 3 days are usually ~15:45, 4 days ~21:00. Diference is now the block time is closer ro 15:45, 21:00...soft credit is being eliminated. They've found combining inherent unproductive days with high block days results in no increase in pay, as long as doesn't exceed min trip salaray aka ADG. SWA has ADG 5:39 & at least 4:21 MDG too, as well as a 1 for 1.55 duty rig. Compare that with our 5:15ADG, 0 MDG, & 1 for 2 duty rig. But beware of unintended consequences by ooohhhh . Tell that to the NYC fleet with 1% commutable trips working their balls off. I'm sure SWA can't wait to get rid of their MDG, so they can avg less pay each day. I'm sure their boss will voluntarily build less productive trips, all for the small tradeoff of working a few extra days a month, an equivalant of an extra bid period each year.
saturn is offline  
Old 03-23-2022, 08:34 AM
  #175  
seeing the large hubs...
 
iaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,754
Default

Originally Posted by Spudhauler
As a 73 pilot not based in Atlanta I can tell you that this is inaccurate. Lots of multiple leg days, which I wouldn't mind so much if we didn't change planes so often, long sits in places with no pilot lounges, and short layovers in crummy hotels. Happy to have more flying at mainline, but that doesn't mean we should settle for a total destruction to our QOL. To pretend that things are all rosy and then blame the pilot group is just carrying management's water, especially during negotiations for a new contract.
Yup - I agree with this for sure. I don't mind a ATL-BNA turn, but putting it together with longer flight say would help productivity and make the day seem less crazy, like MSP-ATL-BNA-ATL? The days that are long are the BHM-ATL-CHS-ATL-BHM or something like that.

After thinking back to trips in the last year, it's the long sits that are killing our days. I remember few longs sits on the 737 years ago, and shorter turns. Now, we have a longer turn time typically (but with an aircraft swap of course) and more sitting in odd places, while another crew takes our plane.
iaflyer is offline  
Old 03-23-2022, 08:36 AM
  #176  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 74
Default

How hard is it to be able to move a reserve day around right now over at DL? Short on reserves or is the grid green?
GRDWN3Grn is offline  
Old 03-23-2022, 08:54 AM
  #177  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,609
Default

Originally Posted by Spudhauler
As a 73 pilot not based in Atlanta I can tell you that this is inaccurate. Lots of multiple leg days, which I wouldn't mind so much if we didn't change planes so often, long sits in places with no pilot lounges, and short layovers in crummy hotels. Happy to have more flying at mainline, but that doesn't mean we should settle for a total destruction to our QOL. To pretend that things are all rosy and then blame the pilot group is just carrying management's water, especially during negotiations for a new contract.
My bad. I'll admit I haven't thoroughly looked thru the bid packages outside of ATL and NYC. Even for NYC trips that report in EWR generally get sent to ATL first leg to get put thru the ringer. In nutshell, I think Rooster sumed it up perfectly, if you can avoid ATL trips are pretty nice

Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk
Trip7 is offline  
Old 03-23-2022, 08:58 AM
  #178  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,609
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
There is a new airport in Tegucigalpa that should not require specific performance if we re enter that market. No more TGU.



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coma...tional_Airport





does STT require special performance? B6 flies a321s there from JFK.



it would not surprise me if in 2-3 years most the 752s are parked and we are left with.

752 charter planes

752 TATL planes

753

763
STT definitely needs special performance to avoid heavy weight restrictions. Even the 757 occasionally is payload optimized. B6 often has a Tech stop for gas on the way back to JFK

Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk
Trip7 is offline  
Old 03-23-2022, 09:33 AM
  #179  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,610
Default

Originally Posted by saturn
SWA doesn't have a fleet like ours, thier network is P2P not hub n' spoke, don't fly redeyes, much lower avg stage, intentionally tight turn times & higher untilization, etc. Much easier to cram more legs per duty than at DL. If we cut & pasted their workrules, we still couldn't replicate their schedules. You know this.

I'd argue since 2018 we haven't seen much increase in value per day, just increased productivity for siimilar pay. NB 3 days are usually ~15:45, 4 days ~21:00. Diference is now the block time is closer ro 15:45, 21:00...soft credit is being eliminated. They've found combining inherent unproductive days with high block days results in no increase in pay, as long as doesn't exceed min trip salaray aka ADG. SWA has ADG 5:39 & at least 4:21 MDG too, as well as a 1 for 1.55 duty rig. Compare that with our 5:15ADG, 0 MDG, & 1 for 2 duty rig. But beware of unintended consequences by ooohhhh . Tell that to the NYC fleet with 1% commutable trips working their balls off. I'm sure SWA can't wait to get rid of their MDG, so they can avg less pay each day. I'm sure their boss will voluntarily build less productive trips, all for the small tradeoff of working a few extra days a month, an equivalant of an extra bid period each year.
I keep seeing these posts about the horrible trips but when I go look at the actual bid packages the trips look pretty good on paper. I realize that trips often fly differently. You state 3 days are normally 15:45 and 4 days 21:00. The bid packages I looked at on the A320 and 73N that was not the case or even close. In fact I posted on here that I was quite surprised at how high the trip values are. What categories are you looking at? I suspect the 717 has lower time just from the nature of the flying but have not looked.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 03-23-2022, 09:33 AM
  #180  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,653
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
STT definitely needs special performance to avoid heavy weight restrictions. Even the 757 occasionally is payload optimized. B6 often has a Tech stop for gas on the way back to JFK

Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk
huh, didn’t know that (also never been)
Gone Flying is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ERAUAV8TR
Envoy Airlines
97
05-25-2019 12:56 PM
Gooselives
Envoy Airlines
62
01-21-2018 12:47 PM
Tango Uniform
Southwest
54
01-11-2017 07:01 PM
flynwmn
Aviation Law
25
10-30-2009 01:16 PM
Seggy
Regional
32
07-08-2009 10:57 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices