Search

Notices

Easter Meltdown

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2021, 02:10 PM
  #191  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,159
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
Principle payments do not lower taxable income according to GAAP.
Principle payments might lower income merely because they are based on principle but principal payments don't. 😁
FL370esq is offline  
Old 04-07-2021, 02:10 PM
  #192  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,258
Default

I think the flaw in sailings thoughts is time and patten bargaining. At first blush what he said is true. But, after we monitized PS...the other carriers came along and demanded Delta or better rates....so they capitalized on our monitization. So, now fast forward a coupla contracts with pattern bargaining and Delta pay will equal AA and UAL. IOW...other carriers reap the rewards of us monetizing the PS. If your time frame is 1 possibly 2contracts....you are prolly money ahead on the switch....if you have multiple contracts I'd stall with the current PS. The bigger negotiating gambit is who( which carrier) settles first...in an improving economy..I would rather not be first


Additionally...straight line pay rates shine like a beacon and even the most inept Wall Street guy can parse the cost.....PS is much harder to cost out consequently less damaging to stock price.....we may not care....but the exes do
Buck Rogers is offline  
Old 04-07-2021, 02:52 PM
  #193  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,012
Default

Profit sharing is about the only tool I’ve seen have any influence on a disgruntled pilot...and make him or her watch the fuel burn (if it’s not a go-home leg) and go say goodbye to our HVCs to make em’ feel special. I look forward to a rapid return of profits.
TED74 is offline  
Old 04-07-2021, 02:59 PM
  #194  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,666
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq
Principle payments might lower income merely because they are based on principle but principal payments don't. 😁
F... (not iller or ixed). Thanks for the correction.

Gunfighter is offline  
Old 04-07-2021, 04:07 PM
  #195  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,159
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
F... (not iller or ixed). Thanks for the correction.

Ahhhhh....ain't it beautiful. 😊
FL370esq is offline  
Old 04-07-2021, 04:11 PM
  #196  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,689
Default

Originally Posted by GucciBoy
That’s a lot of words to say that you don’t think hourly rates will be industry standard with or without P.S. There’s no way we accept lower-than-standard pay rates in section 6, so why bolster them with a P.S. trade?
The industry standard was set by those rates and our subsequent contact.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 04-07-2021, 04:15 PM
  #197  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,689
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
I think the flaw in sailings thoughts is time and patten bargaining. At first blush what he said is true. But, after we monitized PS...the other carriers came along and demanded Delta or better rates....so they capitalized on our monitization. So, now fast forward a coupla contracts with pattern bargaining and Delta pay will equal AA and UAL. IOW...other carriers reap the rewards of us monetizing the PS. If your time frame is 1 possibly 2contracts....you are prolly money ahead on the switch....if you have multiple contracts I'd stall with the current PS. The bigger negotiating gambit is who( which carrier) settles first...in an improving economy..I would rather not be first


Additionally...straight line pay rates shine like a beacon and even the most inept Wall Street guy can parse the cost.....PS is much harder to cost out consequently less damaging to stock price.....we may not care....but the exes do
I would agree all carriers reaped the rewards. I really don’t care as it set our rates higher and since 2009 our contracts have set the standard. Even the last contract TA1 basically established the industry rates. The UAL CEO announced after the Tentative agreement that it forced his hand and they would come back with a much improved offer to the UAL pilots.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 04-07-2021, 05:00 PM
  #198  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 7,014
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The reduction in profit sharing that was monetized in the 2012 contract was about 1.9% in return for an additional 2% in pay rates. Those rates became the cornerstone of almost every contract at the major airlines moving forward and that 2% has compounded with subsequent raises to about 3%. I guess the question becomes would we have the exact same rates today or would they be 3% lower had we not monetized that money. The one thing I do know for sure is I got paid that 3% last year and profit sharing was zero. I suspect our current rates would in fact be lower had we not done that as raising rates across the industry is always a stepping stone approach across the major airlines. Our 2012 contract broke open a long term stagnation airline managements managed to hold onto far longer than they should have been able to maintain.


The monetizing of PS was a mistake back then and will always be a mistake. Pay rates quickly normalize - you even said it above "Those rates became the cornerstone of almost every contract at the major airlines moving forward and that 2% has compounded with subsequent raises to about 3%."

Your point seems to imply that only DALPA can raise the bar for industry rates. Are you implying that no other Pilot group can set higher rates that can, let me be sure I use your exact phrase here " become the cornerstone of almost every contract at the major airlines moving forward."

Maybe since UAL opened a year ahead of us we can snap up to their rates this time around.

Trading PS for a temporary pay bump that will quickly get normalized into industry standard rates is a fools game.

Scoop

Last edited by Scoop; 04-08-2021 at 05:02 AM.
Scoop is offline  
Old 04-07-2021, 05:04 PM
  #199  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 410
Default

Originally Posted by Hawaii50
While we're comparing strategies during the pandemic not sure I'd want to trade places with United pilots. United flies about 250 more RJ's than we do (DL 344, UAL 599, AAL 560) while we brought the 717 and A220s into the mainline fleet. That's quite a few mainline jobs. When I look around at the "partnerships" at AAL with JetBlue and Alaska, I think we're in a pretty good spot as a pilot group. We also instantly add near 30% capacity when the middle seat block goes away. We'll be fine IMO.
They may have more RJs, but UAL has far greater opportunities for intl WB flying than we do.
ElCaribe is offline  
Old 04-07-2021, 05:13 PM
  #200  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,778
Default

Trip and Gunfighter, my mistake, you are correct on principal payments not on income statement
Planetrain is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sparta
United
65
09-20-2020 05:26 AM
Probe
United
11
12-04-2013 10:56 AM
DYNASTY HVY
Hangar Talk
2
04-03-2010 07:08 PM
Jetjock65
Hangar Talk
8
03-24-2008 11:19 PM
CAL EWR
Major
0
03-22-2007 10:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices