Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
5 year Market Outlook opinions >

5 year Market Outlook opinions

Search

Notices

5 year Market Outlook opinions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-2022, 11:51 AM
  #391  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,602
Default

Originally Posted by mispoken
Better than AUPH over the last month, which if i recall, was 15% of your portfolio? (-27% vs your -29%).



The relevance to your question? I own exactly 0% of ARKK while you have 15% in AUPH.



Better update your algo!
Comparing a whole fund to a single stock? Hilarious. BTW I'm not one single bit worried about AUPH. Bought some more today. This conversation get more and more interesting with time

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

Last edited by Trip7; 01-24-2022 at 12:01 PM.
Trip7 is offline  
Old 01-24-2022, 12:01 PM
  #392  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,602
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain
Got any LEAPS on RMO?

Asking for a friend.
Just looked at the chart. Yikes

I wouldn't touch it with a 10 ft pole

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Trip7 is offline  
Old 01-24-2022, 12:03 PM
  #393  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 766
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Comparing a whole fund to a single stock? Hilarious. BTW I'm not one single bit worried about AUPH. Bought some more today

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
My bad, I thought we were just choosing arbitrary data points over arbitrary time frames to rub in each other’s faces.

Here’s another one; since inception ARKK up 300%. Over the same time period SPY up 150%. So, to answer your original question, directly; it’s long term performance has doubled that of SPY.

I agree with the hilarity of the above references, and specifically your absolute obsession with Cathie Woods. For me? I just don’t care because it has zero impact on my portfolio. But the numbers don’t lie, Cathie Has produced market beating results even after the last 2 months.
mispoken is offline  
Old 01-24-2022, 12:06 PM
  #394  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 766
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain
Got any LEAPS on RMO?
Asking for a friend.
I think that was a TegridyFarms darling not long ago, wasn’t it? Maybe he can provide some input.

I’m weary of many EV stocks. Lots of press releases with no product or even prototype. I bet even Trip and I could find some sort of common ground in that arena.
mispoken is offline  
Old 01-24-2022, 12:28 PM
  #395  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,760
Default

Originally Posted by mispoken
I think that was a TegridyFarms darling not long ago, wasn’t it? Maybe he can provide some input.

I’m weary of many EV stocks. Lots of press releases with no product or even prototype. I bet even Trip and I could find some sort of common ground in that arena.
RMO:
I’ve been following it for awhile, what a darling that got slaughtered- both macro and internally. Some of the investment boards went really nasty on the ex-CEO. The current leadership team looks like a placeholder before they shut down. How terrible…

I’m fascinated by the Wild West of EVs and battery technology, but the last 12 months have shown some huge risk sides to even big names. I almost pulled the trigger on GWH and the sodium tech, so glad I didn’t. Maybe down the road for just a speculative fun play.
Planetrain is offline  
Old 01-24-2022, 02:16 PM
  #396  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,602
Default

Originally Posted by mispoken
My bad, I thought we were just choosing arbitrary data points over arbitrary time frames to rub in each other’s faces.



Here’s another one; since inception ARKK up 300%. Over the same time period SPY up 150%. So, to answer your original question, directly; it’s long term performance has doubled that of SPY.



I agree with the hilarity of the above references, and specifically your absolute obsession with Cathie Woods. For me? I just don’t care because it has zero impact on my portfolio. But the numbers don’t lie, Cathie Has produced market beating results even after the last 2 months.
When we began this discussion last summer ARKK had been up 600%+ since inception. Folks are starting to realize that Price matters. The Greater Fool Theory investing worked well last year but the party has to end when there are no Fools left to keep trading deeply unprofitable, cash bleeding companies to. Scary thing is.... ARKK is still overvalved. I think ARKK goes down to the $40s at which point only the few early investors who purchased at $22 will have underperformed the SPY if they held thru out the wave.



Originally Posted by Planetrain
RMO:

I’ve been following it for awhile, what a darling that got slaughtered- both macro and internally. Some of the investment boards went really nasty on the ex-CEO. The current leadership team looks like a placeholder before they shut down. How terrible…



I’m fascinated by the Wild West of EVs and battery technology, but the last 12 months have shown some huge risk sides to even big names. I almost pulled the trigger on GWH and the sodium tech, so glad I didn’t. Maybe down the road for just a speculative fun play.
EVs and Batteries are amazing technologies with a bright future but terrible investment right now. Just like investing in internet companies in the early 2000s, folks get excited 10 years too soo, pay ABSURD prices for companies bleeding cash with intense competition. That's a recipe for destroying capital. Every single industry has gone thru this capital destroying process in the early stage, Cars, Railroads, Airlines, Telcoms, Internet, and now EVs. Stay away, stick to companies that have little debt, positive cashflow, have significant competitive advantages, and buy them Cheap. Cheap as in for every $1 a company makes in normalized earnings over a 5 year period, pay no more than $10.

Originally Posted by mispoken
I think that was a TegridyFarms darling not long ago, wasn’t it? Maybe he can provide some input.



I’m weary of many EV stocks. Lots of press releases with no product or even prototype. I bet even Trip and I could find some sort of common ground in that arena.
We definitely have some common ground there. Tegridy's investing style seems like Cathy Wood. WKHS was another recommendation Tegridy posted. That and RMO look like Permanent Loss of Capital situations. Folks are not only out there buying these highly speculative companies with little to no revenue or earning, but they are out here buy short term options on Margin. My Goodness.



Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Trip7 is offline  
Old 01-24-2022, 02:47 PM
  #397  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Every single industry has gone thru this capital destroying process in the early stage, Cars, Railroads, Airlines, Telcoms, Internet, and now EVs. Stay away, stick to companies that have little debt, positive cashflow, have significant competitive advantages ….
I believe airlines are still underwater after 100 years. Up until the pandemic I think it was turning slightly positive. Now it’s crushed. If not for the bailout we’d be kaput.
ERflyer is offline  
Old 01-24-2022, 03:02 PM
  #398  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,602
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
I believe airlines are still underwater after 100 years. Up until the pandemic I think it was turning slightly positive. Now it’s crushed. If not for the bailout we’d be kaput.
I believe you are correct. Airlines are a tough business. Very capital intensive, high fixed costs, high operating leverage with relatively low margins, and product demand subject to world events

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Trip7 is offline  
Old 01-25-2022, 02:08 AM
  #399  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,602
Default

Originally Posted by tcco94
lol @ you thinking they are going to be used as cloth hangers. It's like I just read an article from seeking alpha from a guy who hasn't exercised in 2 decades. Therefore stock must be junk.



Talking about the dow at 5000. This is literally what I mean about people trying to use old fundamentals on the market. With the way money flows through the market today vs 30 years ago it has now changed forever. Can't wait to see your head explode the day the Dow hits 50k.
It is actually a quite fun going back and looking at these posts. As I stated before, Peletons will become expensive clothes hangers for many people. But dare I say it, Peloton stock looks reasonable here at $30. Price to Sales ratio of 2. Cut cost and focus on profitability and this can be a great turnaround resulting in great returns for those who invest at current valuation. Amazing what paying $8B vs $35B for a company that does $4B in sales does. #PriceMatters


Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Trip7 is offline  
Old 01-25-2022, 07:53 AM
  #400  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 766
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
When we began this discussion last summer ARKK had been up 600%+ since inception. Folks are starting to realize that Price matters. The Greater Fool Theory investing worked well last year but the party has to end when there are no Fools left to keep trading deeply unprofitable, cash bleeding companies to. Scary thing is.... ARKK is still overvalved. I think ARKK goes down to the $40s at which point only the few early investors who purchased at $22 will have underperformed the SPY if they held thru out the wave.





EVs and Batteries are amazing technologies with a bright future but terrible investment right now. Just like investing in internet companies in the early 2000s, folks get excited 10 years too soo, pay ABSURD prices for companies bleeding cash with intense competition. That's a recipe for destroying capital. Every single industry has gone thru this capital destroying process in the early stage, Cars, Railroads, Airlines, Telcoms, Internet, and now EVs. Stay away, stick to companies that have little debt, positive cashflow, have significant competitive advantages, and buy them Cheap. Cheap as in for every $1 a company makes in normalized earnings over a 5 year period, pay no more than $10.



We definitely have some common ground there. Tegridy's investing style seems like Cathy Wood. WKHS was another recommendation Tegridy posted. That and RMO look like Permanent Loss of Capital situations. Folks are not only out there buying these highly speculative companies with little to no revenue or earning, but they are out here buy short term options on Margin. My Goodness.



Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
I dont think anyone is arguing that ARKK can’t completely crater. Massive outflows of that fund could most certainly end it. But again, I couldn’t give two craps about her or her fund. If it’s her demise it what would make you happy, more power! My argument is more in regards to the companies she invests in. Even if her actual fund can’t withstand the drawdown, most of her companies she invests in, can and will. Her top 10 holdings could very possibly draw down so much that everybody ejects at the same time and it’s lights for ARK. Fast forward a decade and odds are in the favor of anyone that had stayed invested in those companies, had generated great deals of wealth.

And that is the crux of my argument. You think you can find these tops and bottoms and “the right valuation”. I admit I am incapable of this and I believe nearly everyone in history that has claimed they can, have failed. If you think you’ve found a short term top and take your winnings and then look back 20-30 years later, chances are you’ve lost out on huge profits.

Your short term valuation models vs my long term buy and hold model is the question here. I’m always buying through ups and downs, you’re buying and selling based on whatever metric you think validates a stock price, which is why evaluating results over long time periods (5+ years) is the key to prove one method or the other.

Slinging handfuls of poop back and fourth over what is unfolding over 2 months or 2 days is useless and a waste of time. I can start making the “call” that everything will go back up against your “call” that everything is doomed. Both of us will be right, but it doesn’t make either one of us “smart”. Because, as always, nobody knows anything.

So, I’m not going to browse years of posts to find calls that you made that were wrong, like what you just did with PTON. But what I am going to do, is go buy some more of my favorite companies!
mispoken is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pinseeker
FedEx
489
09-02-2018 07:32 AM
labbats
Allegiant
243
06-25-2014 05:50 PM
fisherman
Regional
11
02-03-2014 05:17 PM
SoCalGuy
United
34
07-14-2012 06:12 PM
MartyMcFly
Flight Schools and Training
8
04-08-2008 05:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices