5 year Market Outlook opinions
#271
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
The current cryptocurrencies are a giant Ponzi scheme. Crypto and blockchain do have a place within reserve currencies. As nations, like China, and eventually the US and others, set up their own crypto/blockchain around their own fiat currency what will happen to the current crypto’s? What will happen when they’re more regulated? They will trade like stocks but without any underlying hard assets.
As for your last point (I assume you're point to the derivatives and manipulation tactics like we see in assets such as metals and even stocks) that is a concern to some extent. But for BTC the fake paper "whales" don't have the same level of control. There's also a legal push to allow spot ETF's instead of just "futures" as being an arbitrary and caprecious violation of the Administrative Procedures Act. Even if that effort loses, the cat is already out of the bag. They can't contain to anywhere near the same extent an asset that's fungibile 24/7/365 between currencies, private parties and even governments but I say let them try. The "flippers and dippers" will continue to get rekt chasing the very fiat trash its the best alternative to in the first place.
And "China ban" LMAFO! This is like the millionth one of those and has only helped the network. Their pathetic little attempt to control the uncontrollable fiat monstrosity they've unleashed in their paper dragon command and control economy has already backfired in their faces as a multi trillion dollar generational miscalculation. I hope they double ban it. Triple ban it even!
#272
On Reserve
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 20
Tell me you understand Bitcoin without understanding Bitcoin. If you did not mean to add Bitcoin into your “crypto” argument the just ignore.
this will clear it up for you.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YHjYt6Jm5j8
Actually the biggest Ponzi is social security
The current cryptocurrencies are a giant Ponzi scheme. Crypto and blockchain do have a place within reserve currencies. As nations, like China, and eventually the US and others, set up their own crypto/blockchain around their own fiat currency what will happen to the current crypto’s? What will happen when they’re more regulated? They will trade like stocks but without any underlying hard assets.[/QUOTE]
this will clear it up for you.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YHjYt6Jm5j8
Actually the biggest Ponzi is social security
The current cryptocurrencies are a giant Ponzi scheme. Crypto and blockchain do have a place within reserve currencies. As nations, like China, and eventually the US and others, set up their own crypto/blockchain around their own fiat currency what will happen to the current crypto’s? What will happen when they’re more regulated? They will trade like stocks but without any underlying hard assets.[/QUOTE]
#273
https://ocw.mit.edu/search/ocwsearch.htm?q=blockchain%20and%20money
MIT OpenCourses “Blockchain and Money”.
About 23 video lectures from a former Goldman guy who also worked in government in various regulatory capacities.
2018, somewhat dated, NOT a “how to get rich quick investment course”. But I’m 2 courses in & have learned a great deal.
Interesting stuff, not quite ready for prime time (in 2018).
MIT OpenCourses “Blockchain and Money”.
About 23 video lectures from a former Goldman guy who also worked in government in various regulatory capacities.
2018, somewhat dated, NOT a “how to get rich quick investment course”. But I’m 2 courses in & have learned a great deal.
Interesting stuff, not quite ready for prime time (in 2018).
#274
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
The vast majority are. Some don't really even try and hide it. But it's dot-com-bubble season right now and its easy to plow a few hundred or a few thousand into some poopcoin Ponzis to get "millions" of them. There's a few "alts" that will likely make it lomg term, but the more their price "moons" the more it puts pressure on their own alternatives. If a coin's primary use case is fast bank transfers across borders, then it better be cheap and stay cheap or it will be replaced.
True. But their use case is what "stablecoins" currently do, with a splash of cheap and fast transfer tokens. That's it. There's nothing special about unlimited money printing just because its suddenly digital/blockchain/encrypted. Other than building towards a communist/fascist (same difference) "social credit score" and being able to "shut off" your political enemies and dissidents. But "fedcoin" or whatever will never be able to hold a candle to Bitcoin or any relevant use case "altcoin" with an actual long term growth and adoption curve.
Blockchain as a broad concept transcends "money" anyway. You could put vehicle/aircraft production and MX on a block chain for example. Or completely secure election systems. The potential applications are massive.
Depends which crypto. Stables could lose relevancy. Some exchange focused alts could prosper while others are rendered too expensive or redundantly irrelevant. Some "working tokens" will continue to prosper or fail regardless of "govcoins" because they're completely different. BTC with its fixed supply and massive decentralized network swim in a different ocean as all the others anyway. Government "crypto" will be the exact same unlimited supply, wealth & value of labor stealing, tool of the political and banking class as it is today.
.
They're already highly regulated on most on and off ramps (KYC/AML/1099's/etc) and that's actually a good thing for their use cases. The fake notion that they need to be relegated to the dark web to have a use case is rhetoric from those who best case don't know what they're talking about or worst case do and are scared of people being able to have actual immutable value they can't counterfeit on their behalf. Current fiat currencies in every form (including traceable electronic forms) are used for criminal activities by private and state actors infinitely more than third party crypto is especially ones with public ledgers like BTC.
While there is some degree of manipulation, its too decentralized at this point to have a completely distorted price discovery as other asset classes.
As for crypto as we know it, we're at about the 1997 internet adoption and value realization point.
Crypto and blockchain do have a place within reserve currencies.
Blockchain as a broad concept transcends "money" anyway. You could put vehicle/aircraft production and MX on a block chain for example. Or completely secure election systems. The potential applications are massive.
As nations, like China, and eventually the US and others, set up their own crypto/blockchain around their own fiat currency what will happen to the current crypto’s?
.
What will happen when they’re more regulated? They will trade like stocks but without any underlying hard assets.
While there is some degree of manipulation, its too decentralized at this point to have a completely distorted price discovery as other asset classes.
As for crypto as we know it, we're at about the 1997 internet adoption and value realization point.
#275
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
The vast majority are. Some don't really even try and hide it. But it's dot-com-bubble season right now and its easy to plow a few hundred or a few thousand into some poopcoin Ponzis to get "millions" of them. There's a few "alts" that will likely make it lomg term, but the more their price "moons" the more it puts pressure on their own alternatives. If a coin's primary use case is fast bank transfers across borders, then it better be cheap and stay cheap or it will be replaced.
True. But their use case is what "stablecoins" currently do, with a splash of cheap and fast transfer tokens. That's it. There's nothing special about unlimited money printing just because its suddenly digital/blockchain/encrypted. Other than building towards a communist/fascist (same difference) "social credit score" and being able to "shut off" your political enemies and dissidents. But "fedcoin" or whatever will never be able to hold a candle to Bitcoin or any relevant use case "altcoin" with an actual long term growth and adoption curve.
Blockchain as a broad concept transcends "money" anyway. You could put vehicle/aircraft production and MX on a block chain for example. Or completely secure election systems. The potential applications are massive.
Depends which crypto. Stables could lose relevancy. Some exchange focused alts could prosper while others are rendered too expensive or redundantly irrelevant. Some "working tokens" will continue to prosper or fail regardless of "govcoins" because they're completely different. BTC with its fixed supply and massive decentralized network swim in a different ocean as all the others anyway. Government "crypto" will be the exact same unlimited supply, wealth & value of labor stealing, tool of the political and banking class as it is today.
.
They're already highly regulated on most on and off ramps (KYC/AML/1099's/etc) and that's actually a good thing for their use cases. The fake notion that they need to be relegated to the dark web to have a use case is rhetoric from those who best case don't know what they're talking about or worst case do and are scared of people being able to have actual immutable value they can't counterfeit on their behalf. Current fiat currencies in every form (including traceable electronic forms) are used for criminal activities by private and state actors infinitely more than third party crypto is especially ones with public ledgers like BTC.
While there is some degree of manipulation, its too decentralized at this point to have a completely distorted price discovery as other asset classes.
As for crypto as we know it, we're at about the 1997 internet adoption and value realization point.
True. But their use case is what "stablecoins" currently do, with a splash of cheap and fast transfer tokens. That's it. There's nothing special about unlimited money printing just because its suddenly digital/blockchain/encrypted. Other than building towards a communist/fascist (same difference) "social credit score" and being able to "shut off" your political enemies and dissidents. But "fedcoin" or whatever will never be able to hold a candle to Bitcoin or any relevant use case "altcoin" with an actual long term growth and adoption curve.
Blockchain as a broad concept transcends "money" anyway. You could put vehicle/aircraft production and MX on a block chain for example. Or completely secure election systems. The potential applications are massive.
Depends which crypto. Stables could lose relevancy. Some exchange focused alts could prosper while others are rendered too expensive or redundantly irrelevant. Some "working tokens" will continue to prosper or fail regardless of "govcoins" because they're completely different. BTC with its fixed supply and massive decentralized network swim in a different ocean as all the others anyway. Government "crypto" will be the exact same unlimited supply, wealth & value of labor stealing, tool of the political and banking class as it is today.
.
They're already highly regulated on most on and off ramps (KYC/AML/1099's/etc) and that's actually a good thing for their use cases. The fake notion that they need to be relegated to the dark web to have a use case is rhetoric from those who best case don't know what they're talking about or worst case do and are scared of people being able to have actual immutable value they can't counterfeit on their behalf. Current fiat currencies in every form (including traceable electronic forms) are used for criminal activities by private and state actors infinitely more than third party crypto is especially ones with public ledgers like BTC.
While there is some degree of manipulation, its too decentralized at this point to have a completely distorted price discovery as other asset classes.
As for crypto as we know it, we're at about the 1997 internet adoption and value realization point.
As to the topic of this thread, here is a nice graph. It’s for stocks but it speaks to the mindset of investors these days.
https://www.longtermtrends.net/marke...ett-indicator/
#276
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,760
Another perspective on crypto vs fiat for currency:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/investo...urrencies/amp/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/investo...urrencies/amp/
#277
Cypto is today's version of Tulip Mania. I'm playing the Crypto game with a small sum using a quantitative momentum strategy that hopefully(that's I'm only using play money) will trigger sell ahead of time before the inevitable Tech Bubble like crash.
Every few years or so investors reach irrational exuberance and believe the laws of investing have permanently changed. Then they get a reality check like ARKK investors are getting right now.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Every few years or so investors reach irrational exuberance and believe the laws of investing have permanently changed. Then they get a reality check like ARKK investors are getting right now.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
#278
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,995
Cypto is today's version of Tulip Mania. I'm playing the Crypto game with a small sum using a quantitative momentum strategy that hopefully(that's I'm only using play money) will trigger sell ahead of time before the inevitable Tech Bubble like crash.
Every few years or so investors reach irrational exuberance and believe the laws of investing have permanently changed. Then they get a reality check like ARKK investors are getting right now.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Every few years or so investors reach irrational exuberance and believe the laws of investing have permanently changed. Then they get a reality check like ARKK investors are getting right now.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
#279
Cypto is today's version of Tulip Mania. I'm playing the Crypto game with a small sum using a quantitative momentum strategy that hopefully(that's I'm only using play money) will trigger sell ahead of time before the inevitable Tech Bubble like crash.
Every few years or so investors reach irrational exuberance and believe the laws of investing have permanently changed. Then they get a reality check like ARKK investors are getting right now.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Every few years or so investors reach irrational exuberance and believe the laws of investing have permanently changed. Then they get a reality check like ARKK investors are getting right now.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post