Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
LOA 20-04 MEC approves counter >

LOA 20-04 MEC approves counter

Search

Notices

LOA 20-04 MEC approves counter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2020, 10:34 AM
  #421  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 271
Default

Originally Posted by MongoC5
Isn’t that part of the options for 20-03, but fleet dependent?

Mongo
That is correct. But if you look at Dec KLOA availability (which is a pretty good barometer on what they may offer), it looks like there isn’t much chance of any of 20-03 making it down to the narrow bodies. Hope I’m wrong on that.
HTBH is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 11:08 AM
  #422  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,681
Default

Originally Posted by HTBH
Wish there was the option. I’d be interested in even a 30 hour “SIL” at this point.
just remember, it’s a 30 hr SIL at 717B rates
Gone Flying is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 12:43 PM
  #423  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,012
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
Then the MEC unilaterally pulled them down a couple of years ago to be "tough.". One of their stupider moves.
I'm curious what you believe you achieve by misrepresenting the totality of what happened? I mean, I know oversimplifying complex things is how children communicate, but when adults do it I honestly wonder about their motivations or their ignorance on the matter at hand. Do you think your readers don't know the history and the behaviors that led up to the pull down? Or do you not know?
TED74 is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 12:48 PM
  #424  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 866
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
I'm curious what you believe you achieve by misrepresenting the totality of what happened? I mean, I know oversimplifying complex things is how children communicate, but when adults do it I honestly wonder about their motivations or their ignorance on the matter at hand. Do you think your readers don't know the history and the behaviors that led up to the pull down? Or do you not know?
I know the history and agree with Herk(fixed). Stupid. Held our breath and stomped our feet because we didn’t get 55 hours SILS. Pulled it down and the pilot group lost. But you can still get one of those KLOAs that cost the company’s nothing.......amiright?

Last edited by MJP27; 11-02-2020 at 01:31 PM.
MJP27 is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 01:27 PM
  #425  
Moderator
 
FangsF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,971
Default

Originally Posted by MJP27
I know the history and agree with Ted. Stupid. Held our breath and stomped our feet because we didn’t get 55 hours SILS. Pulled it down and the pilot group lost. But you can still get one of those KLOAs that cost the company’s nothing.......amiright?
Don't you mean Herk?
FangsF15 is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 01:30 PM
  #426  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 866
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
Don't you mean Herk?
Yeah, my bad!
MJP27 is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 01:39 PM
  #427  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Road construction signholder
Posts: 2,438
Default

Originally Posted by MJP27
I know the history and agree with Herk(fixed). Stupid. Held our breath and stomped our feet because we didn’t get 55 hours SILS. Pulled it down and the pilot group lost. But you can still get one of those KLOAs that cost the company’s nothing.......amiright?
Pretty much this above. We pulled down SILs because they were "bad" and only paid 45 hours (for example). But KLOAs that paid....zero...were just AOK! And the pilot group had no problem with that. Puzzling.

That said, I suppose I should let it go. Warts and all, I think our negotiators and MEC are doing a decent job--even a very good job. I think our current MEC Chair should be reelected to serve another term. This constant barrage of MEC Chairs serving one two-year term, to then be "ousted" by this week's candidate is a disservice to all of us.
Herkflyr is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 02:09 PM
  #428  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Gramercy Riffs
Posts: 540
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
Well we had those, and worth more than 30 hours--but not 55. Then the MEC unilaterally pulled them down a couple of years ago to be "tough.". One of their stupider moves.
That’s how I remember it.
beernutt is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 02:35 PM
  #429  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,258
Default

Since you all are....



1. Communicating like children
2. Misrepresenting the totality
3. Oversimplifying complex ideas
3. Showing your ignorance

Maybe someone more "enlightened" can help? I can't remember all the nuances.

Hailing Ted!!! (if you are so inclined)
Buck Rogers is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 02:51 PM
  #430  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 200
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
Since you all are....



1. Communicating like children
2. Misrepresenting the totality
3. Oversimplifying complex ideas
3. Showing your ignorance

Maybe someone more "enlightened" can help? I can't remember all the nuances.

Hailing Ted!!! (if you are so inclined)
from my memory, per the contract the company was supposed to notify the union they were going to offer sil’s and they had to agree on it. They never notified the union and posted them. The SC chair called them on it and they did not agree on that interpretation. So we then pulled it down. That is what I remember. Edit, I believed both sides were being stubborn.

Last edited by AlphaBeta; 11-02-2020 at 03:05 PM.
AlphaBeta is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
newKnow
Delta
80
08-23-2015 11:10 PM
TANSTAAFL
Major
728
10-30-2013 01:18 PM
Redeye Pilot
United
92
10-19-2010 08:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices