Search

Notices

March 31st Townhall

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-31-2020, 01:06 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 325
Default

Originally Posted by fishforfun
I’ve been asking myself this since it happened. Do we have lawyers reviewing this stuff or just pilots? The weak wording left it open to the company to pull it away and there was nothing that could be done. Almost hard to be ****ed at the company when we (the MEC) agreed to the language.
What should the MEC have done? Should they have negotiated hard amounts of SILs in each category that the company would be required to offer?
DELTAFO is offline  
Old 03-31-2020, 01:07 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: Hoping for any position
Posts: 2,520
Default

Originally Posted by DELTAFO
What should the MEC have done? Should they have negotiated hard amounts of SILs in each category that the company would be required to offer?
The difference between shall, will and may.
fishforfun is offline  
Old 03-31-2020, 01:23 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GucciBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: Fetal
Posts: 1,148
Default

Originally Posted by DELTAFO
What should the MEC have done? Should they have negotiated hard amounts of SILs in each category that the company would be required to offer?

Exactly. The company would never agree to a hard amount. Minimum? Maybe, but that still takes away flexibility.

Originally Posted by fishforfun
The difference between shall, will and may.
Even if it said “shall” offer SILs, the company could’ve offered 3 and been in compliance. Nothing changes the fact that the SIL language was negotiated on the basis of the company offering a substantial amount of them in what would’ve truly been a win/win scenario. They decided to welch on their end of the spirit of the deal. They anticipated a cost either way. It seems they underestimated the cost of the choice they made.
GucciBoy is offline  
Old 03-31-2020, 01:30 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,237
Default

As has been pointed out before. The company probable that little ploy from the virtual base fiasco. Same, same, only different when the shoe is on the other foot
Buck Rogers is offline  
Old 03-31-2020, 01:32 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,535
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
As has been pointed out before. The company probable that little ploy from the virtual base fiasco. Same, same, only different when the shoe is on the other foot

Except not at all, but sure


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
tunes is offline  
Old 03-31-2020, 01:35 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 393
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
As has been pointed out before. The company probable that little ploy from the virtual base fiasco. Same, same, only different when the shoe is on the other foot
Is this English?
Chakerik is offline  
Old 03-31-2020, 01:46 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,237
Default

Originally Posted by Chakerik
Is this English?
Yea, you got me. Left out the word learned....but you prolly knew that. OMG!!!!!

Seems kinda like a ****ant complaint, but that's just me. Betcha a BUCK, that if you agreed with me you woulda overlooked it. You might find it humorous, I find it sad.....but still my bad, I shoulda proofed it better
Buck Rogers is offline  
Old 03-31-2020, 01:50 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 230
Default

AA management just yanked their equivalent of SILs for their pilot group.
popcopy is offline  
Old 03-31-2020, 01:52 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Position: 6th place
Posts: 1,826
Default

Originally Posted by popcopy
AA management just yanked their equivalent of SILs for their pilot group.

As of right now the only rescinded short term leaves are for 737/320 for the month of April.
mainlineAF is offline  
Old 03-31-2020, 01:53 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 393
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
Yea, you got me. Left out the word learned....but you prolly knew that. OMG!!!!!

Seems kinda like a ****ant complaint, but that's just me. Betcha a BUCK, that if you agreed with me you woulda overlooked it. You might find it humorous, I find it sad.....but still my bad, I shoulda proofed it better
Some of your posts can be hard to decipher.

Not everyone reads the way you think. It's your prerogative to write that way. But sure, me trying to understand what on earth you were writing is apparently insulting.

Have a nice day too
Chakerik is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
j3cub
Allegiant
6367
12-20-2020 08:01 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Endeavor Air
0
03-07-2016 10:30 AM
DG1000
United
66
04-01-2015 01:11 PM
edik
JetBlue
1
04-17-2006 02:07 PM
Freight Dog
Hiring News
0
02-23-2005 07:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices