Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
*MINIMUM BALANCES* New Polling Needed >

*MINIMUM BALANCES* New Polling Needed

Search

Notices

*MINIMUM BALANCES* New Polling Needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2019, 07:15 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
Actually he's not far off.

Using an inflaction calculator and using the last 30 years, $4M right now has same buying power as $2M 30 years ago. So depending on how your brain looks at things, you either need to double your money to have the same buying power, or your current money is only worth 1/2 in future dollar power.

So if we project forward 30 years, $5M right now in retirement only has $2.5M of buying power in 2049 dollars.
And you don’t think there will be further increases in both wages and the amount that is allowed to be set aside by the IRS?

That being said, even using your 50% over 30 years would give you closer to $3 million. Like I said before, ya gotta add in maximizing the contribution and making catchup contributions as well.

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 12-23-2019, 07:17 AM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,535
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
That’s exactly what we are talking about. This whole discussion is about the NN.....both sides of it. Again, my figures are based on getting what is in the NN and starting from a zero balance. I don’t know how else to say that.

If the NN made it thru as is a $200,000 year will yield $50k going into going into ones DC. I’m betting there are many, many FO’s that have been making this and much more.

Denny
Yes, using TVM. Not in total dollars from the company. I acknowledge that any dollar of DC will benefit any new hire more than someone close to retirement. But the reason behind the annuity is to allow people to delay PBGC, SS and more until 70. So, between that massive cash infusion and the gains you get by delaying, how much more retirement are you going to get over a newhire? And again, don't think for one second we are going to get 9%. That's a very expensive proposal.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 12-23-2019, 07:19 AM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,558
Default

Originally Posted by ApachePhil
Any windfall to retirees will incentivize retirement and increase attrition. The larger the windfall (earlier they retire and less they contribute themselves) will further incentivize earlier retirement. There is NO WAY the company will agree to anything that encourages people to retire early given this market.
My guess would be the company will require a clause/exception in the language that requires a pilot to continue working until the latest day allowed by law to qualify for a plus up payout.
Iceberg is offline  
Old 12-23-2019, 07:21 AM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cogf16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: VEOP Retired! 7ER A was last position
Posts: 978
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
Yes, using TVM. Not in total dollars from the company. I acknowledge that any dollar of DC will benefit any new hire more than someone close to retirement. But the reason behind the annuity is to allow people to delay PBGC, SS and more until 70. So, between that massive cash infusion and the gains you get by delaying, how much more retirement are you going to get over a newhire? And again, don't think for one second we are going to get 9%. That's a very expensive proposal.
A big part of your argument is based on your belief that the 9% will be decreased. It's only fair to assume the "massive cash infusion" would be as well.
Cogf16 is offline  
Old 12-23-2019, 07:52 AM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,999
Default

The PWA is used to define the boundaries of working conditions and compensation, for a defined time period. In the absence of a DB plan (which I don't want), I'm not sure I'm comfortable using the PWA to correct for adverse employment/economic conditions of the arguably-distant past. This almost seems like activity/side letter/loa activity that should take place outside of the PWA negotiation process. If the company wants to incentivize folks to stay through MRA, let them do so outside section 6. If folks think they were unfairly compensated during bankruptcy, head back to the courts. No one was forced to stay here after draconian wage cuts and many did not. No one was forced to return from furlough, and many did not. Each day we fly for Delta, we do so agreeing to the current PWA (as upheld or violated by management), with no expectation that some future agreement will compensate for shortcomings... at least that's my view when I don the horse blanket. It simply isn't practical to look very far back or forward, nor is doing so likely to result in compensation that is not only fair now but decades into the future. JMHO.
TED74 is offline  
Old 12-23-2019, 08:06 AM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,390
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
And you don’t think there will be further increases in both wages and the amount that is allowed to be set aside by the IRS?

That being said, even using your 50% over 30 years would give you closer to $3 million. Like I said before, ya gotta add in maximizing the contribution and making catchup contributions as well.

Denny
Do I personally think wages will go up over the next 30 years? Yes.

Did the wages go up at all between 1989 and 2019? Did the IRS limits change during that timeframe? I beleive the answer to both of those is yes.

Did wages go down at all? Bankrupcy, furlough, recessions? Are you telling me those won't happen at all during my next 30 years?

In my eyes everything that happened over the last 30 years with wages, IRS limits, and the industry, can happen all over again in the next 30 years, so all that is a wash.

The orignal statement was about $5M being worth $2M in 30 years due to inflaction....you said it was a "BS figure"....I was just trying to show the math using a simple inflation calculator that it wasn't as BS as you stated it was.
DWC CAP10 USAF is offline  
Old 12-23-2019, 10:15 AM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,535
Default

Originally Posted by boog123
Do you feel they should get a paycheck when they volunteered, at one point, to be gone for extended periods?


They do, from their military job.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
tunes is offline  
Old 12-23-2019, 10:56 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 426
Default

Originally Posted by tunes
They do, from their military job.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Maybe you should write your congressman/senators to repeal USERRA. Just tell them you don’t think it’s fair and you are upset that they are legally required to receive some perks that you don’t get.
180ToAJ is offline  
Old 12-23-2019, 12:13 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
beis77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 630
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
Well then I guess you will never vote yes on a contract. You DO realize that any percentage pay raise is NOT an equal pay raise for all pilots? The percentage might be the same but the dollar amount is not.

Denny
Yes, I understand the concept of a percentage raise and hope we all get a big one next contract. My issue with the MB as presented is that it feels like a bandaid (restoration-lite) fix for the deadzoners with little to no benefit to those hired post BK. Granted there are a lot of details that need to be fleshed out.

My question (rhetorical) is: what will we be giving up in negotiating equity to make MB happen, and is the offset worth it to all pilots? Are we giving up on higher DC %? Higher pay%? Better training pay? Etc. Rest assured, MB will cost us something. And is it worth whatever it will cost us? My gut instinct says “no”, hence my previous response to the OP’s poll.
beis77 is offline  
Old 12-23-2019, 01:19 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cogf16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: VEOP Retired! 7ER A was last position
Posts: 978
Default

Originally Posted by beis77
Yes, I understand the concept of a percentage raise and hope we all get a big one next contract. My issue with the MB as presented is that it feels like a bandaid (restoration-lite) fix for the deadzoners with little to no benefit to those hired post BK. Granted there are a lot of details that need to be fleshed out.

My question (rhetorical) is: what will we be giving up in negotiating equity to make MB happen, and is the offset worth it to all pilots? Are we giving up on higher DC %? Higher pay%? Better training pay? Etc. Rest assured, MB will cost us something. And is it worth whatever it will cost us? My gut instinct says “no”, hence my previous response to the OP’s poll.
You think 9%DC increase is "little to no benefit to those hired post BK??? Compounded for 10-35 years is a HUGE benefit. Do the math.

Last edited by Cogf16; 12-23-2019 at 01:39 PM.
Cogf16 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fly Boy 2
Flight Schools and Training
2
03-03-2008 06:47 AM
698jet
Hiring News
0
02-27-2008 02:35 PM
698jet
Hiring News
6
02-26-2008 09:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices