Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
*MINIMUM BALANCES* New Polling Needed >

*MINIMUM BALANCES* New Polling Needed

Search

Notices

*MINIMUM BALANCES* New Polling Needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2020, 09:55 AM
  #171  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,745
Default

Originally Posted by AirbusPTC
I know...wow...I'm not the first to say this, I've seen it on chitchat but someone needs to remind ChitChat guys every once in a while that well...there were IRA's and 401K programs since the early 1980's. What were they doing with all their money during the decade(s) before bankruptcy? Some might remember the push at other airlines in the late '80's to get pensions in the pilot's own name. Never happened here and it was foolish to defer income for a "promise" of a pension from a company in the most cyclical industry on the planet (ALPA was warned about this in the '80's). A pension in an industry that is littered with bankrupt airlines...really? Who's fault is it that many didn't save for retirement, the "new-hires"? I suspect many hired since Oct '96 will not share the chit-chat forums views on the minimum balance plan, so it's a non-starter. Life is about choices right?
I was retired 15 years when they pulled the rug. How can you forecast that? In the 60's and 70's there were no vehicles to tuck retirement money other than The Family Care Plan.
badflaps is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 10:07 AM
  #172  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,463
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain
I disagree. Whether you agree with the negotiators or not, saying your min is less undermines their bargaining position. Anecdotes start to add up and make their way back to the company’s perception of power at the table.

Share your mins in the cockpit, definitely share them with your reps. I think it hurts us when you share them on the public web board.
You give way too much credibility to an internet chat board. I’d take 100% raise minimum but I don’t need medical, dental, vacation or travel benefits. There, that ought to skew the “data”
notEnuf is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 11:30 AM
  #173  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AirbusPTC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Posts: 314
Default

Originally Posted by badflaps
I was retired 15 years when they pulled the rug. How can you forecast that? In the 60's and 70's there were no vehicles to tuck retirement money other than The Family Care Plan.
First, I'm talking about pilots currently on the seniority list. I'm not sure when Delta first offered the DB plan but it was relatively recent compared to other industries...say late 1960's or early '70's? Also 401k's started in 1978 and IRA's in 1974, not sure when you were hired. There were certainly opportunities for pilots to save post-tax retirement money during their careers correct? Especially during the '70's and 80's when an average Captain's MONTHLY income equaled the purchase price of a new Cadillac! I am a second generation airline pilot and grew up in a pilot ghetto...EVERY Captain I knew had a lake cabin in a nearby state, a ski condo in the Rockies somewhere, a boat, at least one airplane and a variety of vehicles and tractors. It was a good life, but maybe some of that money should have been saved for a rainy day?
AirbusPTC is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 11:33 AM
  #174  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by AirbusPTC
Some might remember the push at other airlines in the late '80's to get pensions in the pilot's own name. Never happened here and it was foolish to defer income for a "promise" of a pension from a company in the most cyclical industry on the planet (ALPA was warned about this in the '80's).
Wrong. Ever hear of the MPPP? Do a little research before throwing stones.

Every Pilot on our seniority list hired back then came into an already functioning/existing DB style retirement plan. It’s not like we had a choice in the matter. Yes the DB turned out to be foolish but there was no other choice and when one WAS negotiated, it wasn’t in place long enough to make a huge difference.

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 12:09 PM
  #175  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AirbusPTC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Posts: 314
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
Wrong. Ever hear of the MPPP? Do a little research before throwing stones.

Every Pilot on our seniority list hired back then came into an already functioning/existing DB style retirement plan. It’s not like we had a choice in the matter. Yes the DB turned out to be foolish but there was no other choice and when one WAS negotiated, it wasn’t in place long enough to make a huge difference.

Denny
First of all I'm not throwing stones. I am simply pushing back on the idea posted here and on other forums that we have to negotiate for a MINIMUM BALANCE PLAN and that the new hire pilots should have to make a sacrifice for those that have gone before them. Yes, I actually had the MPPP? That didn't replace the pension though did it? Of course we HAD A CHOICE, pilots had the option of saving pre and post-taxed money for retirement instead of relying on a pension. A pension that depended on an airline lasting longer than your retirement lifespan...in this violently-cyclical business...really? I've saved 10% of my earnings since I was 22 for the sole purpose of funding my retirement. I came up through the civilian ranks and that 10% wasn't much money because I didn't make much...but eventually I did and with compound interest 31 years later...it's a nice nest egg. As an generation "Xer" I've NEVER expected to receive a dime from Social Security or a Pension because that's what we've been told from college age onward. So I chose to save...that was my choice. Many made different choices and are content to live with those choices, some are not.
AirbusPTC is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 01:18 PM
  #176  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by AirbusPTC
First of all I'm not throwing stones. I am simply pushing back on the idea posted here and on other forums that we have to negotiate for a MINIMUM BALANCE PLAN and that the new hire pilots should have to make a sacrifice for those that have gone before them.

Sacrifice? That's a bit melodramatic and if that's a "Sacrifice," throw me in that briar patch with 20/30 years to go and I'd take the chance in a heartbeat vice getting a plus-up. The ones saying we don't know what will happen as in downturn, another bankruptcy etc. are just looking for excuses. The average market gains have been 10% per year. Again, throw me in that briar patch.

Yes, I actually had the MPPP? That didn't replace the pension though did it?

The point of the MPPP was to eventually replace the DB. It was gonna take time but that was supposed to be the end result. It was a different funding source and when it matched your earned DB then all the funding would come from it vs the DB.

Of course we HAD A CHOICE, pilots had the option of saving pre and post-taxed money for retirement instead of relying on a pension. A pension that depended on an airline lasting longer than your retirement lifespan...in this violently-cyclical business...really?

So you had a choice of whether or not to participate in a DB vs some other retirement plan negotiated by ALPA? Don't think so... So you are wrong we did NOT have a choice with deferred compensation going into the DB. Just wrong.

I've saved 10% of my earnings since I was 22 for the sole purpose of funding my retirement. I came up through the civilian ranks and that 10% wasn't much money because I didn't make much...but eventually I did and with compound interest 31 years later...it's a nice nest egg.

Well good for you. I'm glad you were able to. Others did the best they could but, ya know, life can get in the way. Taking care of aging parents, disabled kids, college, mortgage, spouse who doesn't work to stay home and raise the kids........and any number of "excuses."

As an generation "Xer" I've NEVER expected to receive a dime from Social Security or a Pension because that's what we've been told from college age onward. So I chose to save...that was my choice. Many made different choices and are content to live with those choices, some are not.
You do know our Pension was actually overfunded just before it wasn't? The downturn in the stock market and the run on the pension fund by those taking the 50% lump pretty much destroyed it.

Well I expect to receive SS and I did expect to receive a pension. Forseeing 9-11, Bankruptcy and the loss of the pension (pretty much the only way to lose it was in BK) was not on my (or anyones) radar at the time.

I chose to save too......in the 401k Delta offered. IIRC we got a max 2% matching that initially could be invested in the options available in the 401k. A few years later those matching funds came in Delta Preferred Stock.......guess what happened to that $70+ stock.....

Yes we all make the choices we need too. Don't belittle the choice of others without knowing their circumstances.

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 01:47 PM
  #177  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AirbusPTC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Posts: 314
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
You do know our Pension was actually overfunded just before it wasn't? The downturn in the stock market and the run on the pension fund by those taking the 50% lump pretty much destroyed it.

Well I expect to receive SS and I did expect to receive a pension. Forseeing 9-11, Bankruptcy and the loss of the pension (pretty much the only way to lose it was in BK) was not on my (or anyones) radar at the time.

I chose to save too......in the 401k Delta offered. IIRC we got a max 2% matching that initially could be invested in the options available in the 401k. A few years later those matching funds came in Delta Preferred Stock.......guess what happened to that $70+ stock.....

Yes we all make the choices we need too. Don't belittle the choice of others without knowing their circumstances.

Denny
I said we've all made choices, most are content with the choices they've made, some are not. Your retirement vehicle certainly wasn't limited to the company offerings...that is my point. I'm not belittling anyone's choices. Except for those in the '70's-'90's with the second and third house, airplanes, cars and boats/toys paid with money that should have been set aside for retirement. And except for a disabled child I've had to deal with each of those challenges you mentioned, plus a sick wife (the last ten years). Don't get me started on UHC. Finally, I raise the BS flag that losing our pensions wasn't on the radar of many pilots. That was a HUGE topic in the '90's here and at other airlines...because of PanAM $840 million, Eastern $550 million, TWA $700 million and eventually UAL $7 BILLION in unfunded pensions...all before we lost our pensions. If it wasn't on your radar you weren't paying attention. A pension from a corporation, you trusted a corporation?

Last edited by AirbusPTC; 01-01-2020 at 02:13 PM.
AirbusPTC is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 02:35 PM
  #178  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,745
Default

A Caddy a month, what BS. In 1974 my 727A pay was $54,000. Cadillacs were waay more than $5 grand. Delta took over pilot pensions in 1972. The money basically funded the NE purchase and a whole slew of '72's. There was an excellent chance had that not happened, DAL would have gone the way of Braniff, and the horse blanket would be a distant memory and you would be working at EAL. While IRAs and 401's were around in the late 70's, they were not approved by the IRS till later for airlines.
badflaps is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 03:11 PM
  #179  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by NavyFlyer
I’m a reservist that just returned from abroad flying with 32 other Delta military aviators. All are mid-30’s/early 40’s with around 4-5 years on property.

Not one of us is in favor of a TA that includes anything inequitable between all pilots on the seniority list.

Increased DC: great. Fill up my 401k with company money: excellent. Invest my additional DC into the MBCP: eh, okay. It’s a different source of income later in life that’s still “estatable.” But give some people a “plus up,” and take more money for one group at the expense of all of us: absolutely not.

No one can tell me what my financial future holds and how the market will perform. No one can tell me if I’ll have social security benefits (and what age I’ll be able to utilize them), or what our future tax liabilities are (at some point our politicians will realize we have a deficit).

This is not to say that I don’t recognize that some people took it in the shorts, or that everyone won’t have a 60% FAE guaranteed annuity. But between increased DC benefits, Profit Sharing, PBGC/Frozen pension benefits, social security and insane market performance since ‘07, most captains I fly with are going into retirement doing very well.

Life happens. And I’m preparing for my salary decrease, or reduced benefits later in my career due to causes outside of my control. I’m certainly not going to ask others to cover for me later in my life at their own expense or that of the whole.

So yes, I’d like polling done. I’d tell the guys polling that I want scope protections, increased DC, increased pay, vacation and training increases, and QOL asks before I’d EVER consider plussing up someone else’s retirement at the groups expense.

And since we are not going to get even all of those important things, we are wasting negotiators and the company’s time even bringing this minimum balance up in any negotiation session.

Oh, and another thing. Polling numbers suck among my demographic because we don’t answer cell phone calls from random numbers. And these clowns don’t have a call back number, or allow us to make an appointment to do our poll (we’ve got kids, sports activities, recitals, crap trips to fly, and all of the other stuff that the Grandpa’s willing to answer their phones have long left in their rear view mirror). How about they email me and allow me to put some time on my calendar so they can get my feedback on this issue? They’d see that it’s a waste of time to bring a min balance to MEMRAT because it’ll be a huge failure and cause a massive delay in our contract...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Agreed. Scope benefits you more than me. You expect me to fight for it?

Last edited by Scoop; 01-01-2020 at 07:39 PM. Reason: TOS
JamesBond is offline  
Old 01-01-2020, 03:39 PM
  #180  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AirbusPTC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Posts: 314
Default

Originally Posted by badflaps
A Caddy a month, what BS. In 1974 my 727A pay was $54,000. Cadillacs were waay more than $5 grand. Delta took over pilot pensions in 1972. The money basically funded the NE purchase and a whole slew of '72's. There was an excellent chance had that not happened, DAL would have gone the way of Braniff, and the horse blanket would be a distant memory and you would be working at EAL. While IRAs and 401's were around in the late 70's, they were not approved by the IRS till later for airlines.
No, not BS, did a quick Google search, '74 Caddy retailed for just over $7k. Funny you should mention 1974 because that year saw a NEW contract at Delta with senior Captains making over $100,000 for the first time (google it:"At Delta Air Lines Has the Industry Agog" WSJ Sept.24 1974). So that's where the term came from, some Delta Capts. making more per month than the retail cost of a new Cadillac!

So you're saying Delta used pension funds to buy NE and a bunch of 727's...now who's BSing? I know the Teamsters used pension money to buy things but Delta? Who exactly did Delta take over the pensions from...just curious? Also, you were allowed to fund an IRA. The IRS didn't prohibit airline employees from funding IRA's ever. Also there were other non-Delta ways to save money back then, as there are today.

Just so I understand...are you saying that if Delta didn't purchase NE Delta wouldn't have survived? OR if Delta hadn't purchased all those 727's they wouldn't have survived? Just curious.
AirbusPTC is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fly Boy 2
Flight Schools and Training
2
03-03-2008 06:47 AM
698jet
Hiring News
0
02-27-2008 02:35 PM
698jet
Hiring News
6
02-26-2008 09:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices