Nov/dec ae
#941
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,692
All the discussion about locks and timing bids to extend them does not have much bearing on reality. Bid timing is driven by simulator availability and network. With the training department running near capacity sim availability is critical and they can’t leave slots unfilled. I doubt going forward they even look at freezes. In addition the majority of pilots are not jumping equipment the minute their freeze is up.
#942
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Taxi Driver
Posts: 414
All the discussion about locks and timing bids to extend them does not have much bearing on reality. Bid timing is driven by simulator availability and network. With the training department running near capacity sim availability is critical and they can’t leave slots unfilled. I doubt going forward they even look at freezes. In addition the majority of pilots are not jumping equipment the minute their freeze is up.
#943
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,692
I am not a sky is falling guy, but of course they look at freezes. It's all about cost containment. Much of executive pay is in stock, and Wall Street loves to see costs kept in check, which drives up our stock price. If they weren't looking at freezes they'd go away or the MOAB spacing would be different.
#944
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 907
I am not a sky is falling guy, but of course they look at freezes. It's all about cost containment. Much of executive pay is in stock, and Wall Street loves to see costs kept in check, which drives up our stock price. If they weren't looking at freezes they'd go away or the MOAB spacing would be different.
Are you saying that because 2 MOABs are spaced 22 months apart that posted vacancies go unfilled? Just because an individual pilot is still seat locked that doesn’t mean there aren’t plenty of other pilots to take that spot and generate secondary vacancies which may be back filled.
They started the MOABs when they had large numbers of displacement. By using all of the vacancies for the year they were able to minimize secondary displacements which are far more expensive than an individual vacancy.
I’m not saying there is no overall effect on training cycles with 3 year “lock,” but it’s probably way less than people here think and has more of an effect on an individual instead of the whole group.
#945
Moderator
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 7,014
Yes and no. I don't feel seat locks are the main driver of AE spacing and I strongly believe that the once a year 365 conversions are more about minimizing displacement induced training. All other things being equal the company would like to space them to minimize training churn so it makes more sense to tactically adjust them by a bit here and there - like we are seeing with this current AE, but I don't think that is a huge factor in the AE placement.
Looking at the current AE - no immediate training capacity for the heavies, so why start a guys clock ticking now? I would do the same thing if I was planning training. However with all of that said if you are seat locked until June and a MOAB comes out in April or May that you are not eligible to bid for it may have the same affect.
So on an individual basis Pilots may get caught up with a longer artificial seat lock here and there, but you will always have this problem to some degree or another with any bid spacing. More frequent smaller bids would greatly minimize this issue so hopefully we will start seeing those.
One final thought - I believe we have longer seat locks than both AMR and UAL, not sure about the cargo guys, so we should definitely be looking to improve them.
Scoop
Looking at the current AE - no immediate training capacity for the heavies, so why start a guys clock ticking now? I would do the same thing if I was planning training. However with all of that said if you are seat locked until June and a MOAB comes out in April or May that you are not eligible to bid for it may have the same affect.
So on an individual basis Pilots may get caught up with a longer artificial seat lock here and there, but you will always have this problem to some degree or another with any bid spacing. More frequent smaller bids would greatly minimize this issue so hopefully we will start seeing those.
One final thought - I believe we have longer seat locks than both AMR and UAL, not sure about the cargo guys, so we should definitely be looking to improve them.
Scoop
#946
Yes and no. I don't feel seat locks are the main driver of AE spacing and I strongly believe that the once a year 365 conversions are more about minimizing displacement induced training. All other things being equal the company would like to space them to minimize training churn so it makes more sense to tactically adjust them by a bit here and there - like we are seeing with this current AE, but I don't think that is a huge factor in the AE placement.
Looking at the current AE - no immediate training capacity for the heavies, so why start a guys clock ticking now? I would do the same thing if I was planning training. However with all of that said if you are seat locked until June and a MOAB comes out in April or May that you are not eligible to bid for it may have the same affect.
So on an individual basis Pilots may get caught up with a longer artificial seat lock here and there, but you will always have this problem to some degree or another with any bid spacing. More frequent smaller bids would greatly minimize this issue so hopefully we will start seeing those.
One final thought - I believe we have longer seat locks than both AMR and UAL, not sure about the cargo guys, so we should definitely be looking to improve them.
Scoop
Looking at the current AE - no immediate training capacity for the heavies, so why start a guys clock ticking now? I would do the same thing if I was planning training. However with all of that said if you are seat locked until June and a MOAB comes out in April or May that you are not eligible to bid for it may have the same affect.
So on an individual basis Pilots may get caught up with a longer artificial seat lock here and there, but you will always have this problem to some degree or another with any bid spacing. More frequent smaller bids would greatly minimize this issue so hopefully we will start seeing those.
One final thought - I believe we have longer seat locks than both AMR and UAL, not sure about the cargo guys, so we should definitely be looking to improve them.
Scoop
#947
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: Hoping for any position
Posts: 2,529
Yes and no. I don't feel seat locks are the main driver of AE spacing and I strongly believe that the once a year 365 conversions are more about minimizing displacement induced training. All other things being equal the company would like to space them to minimize training churn so it makes more sense to tactically adjust them by a bit here and there - like we are seeing with this current AE, but I don't think that is a huge factor in the AE placement.
Looking at the current AE - no immediate training capacity for the heavies, so why start a guys clock ticking now? I would do the same thing if I was planning training. However with all of that said if you are seat locked until June and a MOAB comes out in April or May that you are not eligible to bid for it may have the same affect.
So on an individual basis Pilots may get caught up with a longer artificial seat lock here and there, but you will always have this problem to some degree or another with any bid spacing. More frequent smaller bids would greatly minimize this issue so hopefully we will start seeing those.
One final thought - I believe we have longer seat locks than both AMR and UAL, not sure about the cargo guys, so we should definitely be looking to improve them.
Scoop
Looking at the current AE - no immediate training capacity for the heavies, so why start a guys clock ticking now? I would do the same thing if I was planning training. However with all of that said if you are seat locked until June and a MOAB comes out in April or May that you are not eligible to bid for it may have the same affect.
So on an individual basis Pilots may get caught up with a longer artificial seat lock here and there, but you will always have this problem to some degree or another with any bid spacing. More frequent smaller bids would greatly minimize this issue so hopefully we will start seeing those.
One final thought - I believe we have longer seat locks than both AMR and UAL, not sure about the cargo guys, so we should definitely be looking to improve them.
Scoop
#948
I remember everyone complaining about the small AE’s that came out about every 9 weeks. The cries of when are we going to see the MOAB with the huge movement were constant. Now that we have had them we have cries about the bids not being frequent enough and guys are stuck in a base or seat locked for eternity.
So it seems we want huge frequent AE’s all while stating that training is at capacity and can’t handle anything more. I guess we will need to cave on company wants/needs for training. Wait the. There won’t be huge frequent AE’s.
Thanks it, I’m mad, confused, and can offer no help.
So it seems we want huge frequent AE’s all while stating that training is at capacity and can’t handle anything more. I guess we will need to cave on company wants/needs for training. Wait the. There won’t be huge frequent AE’s.
Thanks it, I’m mad, confused, and can offer no help.
#949
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,692
Yes and no. I don't feel seat locks are the main driver of AE spacing and I strongly believe that the once a year 365 conversions are more about minimizing displacement induced training. All other things being equal the company would like to space them to minimize training churn so it makes more sense to tactically adjust them by a bit here and there - like we are seeing with this current AE, but I don't think that is a huge factor in the AE placement.
Looking at the current AE - no immediate training capacity for the heavies, so why start a guys clock ticking now? I would do the same thing if I was planning training. However with all of that said if you are seat locked until June and a MOAB comes out in April or May that you are not eligible to bid for it may have the same affect.
So on an individual basis Pilots may get caught up with a longer artificial seat lock here and there, but you will always have this problem to some degree or another with any bid spacing. More frequent smaller bids would greatly minimize this issue so hopefully we will start seeing those.
One final thought - I believe we have longer seat locks than both AMR and UAL, not sure about the cargo guys, so we should definitely be looking to improve them.
Scoop
Looking at the current AE - no immediate training capacity for the heavies, so why start a guys clock ticking now? I would do the same thing if I was planning training. However with all of that said if you are seat locked until June and a MOAB comes out in April or May that you are not eligible to bid for it may have the same affect.
So on an individual basis Pilots may get caught up with a longer artificial seat lock here and there, but you will always have this problem to some degree or another with any bid spacing. More frequent smaller bids would greatly minimize this issue so hopefully we will start seeing those.
One final thought - I believe we have longer seat locks than both AMR and UAL, not sure about the cargo guys, so we should definitely be looking to improve them.
Scoop
#950
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 319
Is the artificial 3 year seat lock really a thing?
There are about 2 months from AE post to 1st conversion.
(We had a smaller AE released on Sep 9th. The results were posted on Sep 23rd with 1st conversions in Nov)
Your seat lock has to be up before the 1st conversion, not the AE post date. Wouldn't that drive the MOABs back 2 months a year in order to enforce the 3 year seat lock? That would be one every 10 months.
Let's say you were awarded something June 17 with the seat lock up June 19.
The next MOAB would have to be be April 18 to prevent people from 2 years prior to be awarded something.
Your seat lock expiration year would have be be Feb 19. So, you would have to wait until Dec 19 for the next MOAB.
So, isn't it more like a 2 1/2 year artificial seat lock?
Also, what percentage of pilots are trying to move every 2 years? Most pilots that I know avoid Virgina Ave.
I imagine the company is looking for outside of the box thinking, but I just don't know how effective forcing a small percentage of pilots to delay training 6 months is.
There are about 2 months from AE post to 1st conversion.
(We had a smaller AE released on Sep 9th. The results were posted on Sep 23rd with 1st conversions in Nov)
Your seat lock has to be up before the 1st conversion, not the AE post date. Wouldn't that drive the MOABs back 2 months a year in order to enforce the 3 year seat lock? That would be one every 10 months.
Let's say you were awarded something June 17 with the seat lock up June 19.
The next MOAB would have to be be April 18 to prevent people from 2 years prior to be awarded something.
Your seat lock expiration year would have be be Feb 19. So, you would have to wait until Dec 19 for the next MOAB.
So, isn't it more like a 2 1/2 year artificial seat lock?
Also, what percentage of pilots are trying to move every 2 years? Most pilots that I know avoid Virgina Ave.
I imagine the company is looking for outside of the box thinking, but I just don't know how effective forcing a small percentage of pilots to delay training 6 months is.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post