Nov/dec ae
#401
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 480
I think alot of people are going to be surprised next summer when there aren't nearly as many Greenslips and the pace is significantly reduced.
Reasons:
1. No unexpected 3% increase in flying above planned
2. More balanced staffing in regards to fleets/bases
3. No JFK runway construction allowing much more efficient use of airspace
4. The thunderstorms will probably not be as bad
5. The fleets that struggled the most with staffing this summer have a high amount of training capacity (73N/320)
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Reasons:
1. No unexpected 3% increase in flying above planned
2. More balanced staffing in regards to fleets/bases
3. No JFK runway construction allowing much more efficient use of airspace
4. The thunderstorms will probably not be as bad
5. The fleets that struggled the most with staffing this summer have a high amount of training capacity (73N/320)
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
The takeaway should be stop trying to plan to perfection on a year long AE. There WILL be something unexpected. It’s just a matter of what it is and how significant it will be. More frequent AEs will help.
#402
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Position: 6th place
Posts: 1,826
The climate is getting more volatile. If anything last summer is the new normal, not the exception.
#403
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
#404
Moderator
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 7,014
I think alot of people are going to be surprised next summer when there aren't nearly as many Greenslips and the pace is significantly reduced.
Reasons:
1. No unexpected 3% increase in flying above planned
2. More balanced staffing in regards to fleets/bases
3. No JFK runway construction allowing much more efficient use of airspace
4. The thunderstorms will probably not be as bad
5. The fleets that struggled the most with staffing this summer have a high amount of training capacity (73N/320)
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Reasons:
1. No unexpected 3% increase in flying above planned
2. More balanced staffing in regards to fleets/bases
3. No JFK runway construction allowing much more efficient use of airspace
4. The thunderstorms will probably not be as bad
5. The fleets that struggled the most with staffing this summer have a high amount of training capacity (73N/320)
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Maybe if "next summer" starts tomorrow but when was the last time a DAL Marketing plan went that long without a change? We are firing on all cylinders and our marketing team is doing a great job with maximizing revenue but they are flat out schizophrenic when it comes to developing a plan and then executing it.
Finally I think you are confusing the word "unexpected" with "planned."
How could we possibly know what the "unexpected" increase in flying is if by definition it is unexpected?
I do not think that word means what you think it means.
Reminds me of something a wise man once said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTRKCXC0JFg
#405
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,012
I think alot of people are going to be surprised next summer when there aren't nearly as many Greenslips and the pace is significantly reduced.
Reasons:
1. No unexpected 3% increase in flying above planned
2. More balanced staffing in regards to fleets/bases
3. No JFK runway construction allowing much more efficient use of airspace
4. The thunderstorms will probably not be as bad
5. The fleets that struggled the most with staffing this summer have a high amount of training capacity (73N/320)
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Reasons:
1. No unexpected 3% increase in flying above planned
2. More balanced staffing in regards to fleets/bases
3. No JFK runway construction allowing much more efficient use of airspace
4. The thunderstorms will probably not be as bad
5. The fleets that struggled the most with staffing this summer have a high amount of training capacity (73N/320)
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
#407
False. Global warm....errr...climate change bro! Weather is only going to get worse from here on out!
#408
I think alot of people are going to be surprised next summer when there aren't nearly as many Greenslips and the pace is significantly reduced.
Reasons:
1. No unexpected 3% increase in flying above planned
2. More balanced staffing in regards to fleets/bases
3. No JFK runway construction allowing much more efficient use of airspace
4. The thunderstorms will probably not be as bad
5. The fleets that struggled the most with staffing this summer have a high amount of training capacity (73N/320)
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Reasons:
1. No unexpected 3% increase in flying above planned
2. More balanced staffing in regards to fleets/bases
3. No JFK runway construction allowing much more efficient use of airspace
4. The thunderstorms will probably not be as bad
5. The fleets that struggled the most with staffing this summer have a high amount of training capacity (73N/320)
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
2. They’ll need to change rotation construction to more reasonable as well. There is always an unbalanced fleet, too. Whatever it is this year, it’ll be another one next year.
3. There will be other construction next year.
4. Seriously? They happen every summer, across the country. It’s kinda a thing with the climate. Atlanta actually was a bit lighter than usual this year. Poor rotation construction and cutting pads reduced ability to recover. It’s why we have people on their 4th GSs still going in mid October.
5. See 2.
This 5 talking points are asinine and are akin to giving Tylenol to a cancer patient. Root cause: they royally screwed up staffing trying to cut corners and save money when we should have been padding the coffers in advance of massive retirements to further the best airline in the world. Building bid packs with the vast majority of 4 and 5 day trips with over 8 hour blocks days looks neat, but they blow up and require 3x’s the pilots to cover when they do. Which they did.
#410
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,159
Of course, posted widebody vacancies create numerous contingent vacancies (unlike posted narrow-body vacancies) so an award that looks small on paper can still generate a bunch of movement. Just a matter of how much backfilling CR wants to permit.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post