Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Minimum Cash Value plan and the IRS >

Minimum Cash Value plan and the IRS

Search

Notices

Minimum Cash Value plan and the IRS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2019, 02:13 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
A major issue I have with "making deadzoners whole" is when retired pilots are ignored. IF, big IF, we are doing some sort of targeted retirement for those who lost pensions, the only fair option includes retired pilots. I can't get behind righting the wrongs of the past if it doesn't address the group who was wronged.

As far as the MBCBP goes, this is a major cost savings initiative for the company and should be considered in valuing the contributions. If rough numbers, a 4% increase in pay would be the same net cost to Delta as a 5% MBCBP contribution. We won't see those numbers at the line pilot level, but I expect our negotiation team is looking at the entire picture. Simply converting DPSP Cash to MBCBP is a huge cost savings for the company, with limited benefit to the pilot group.
If the “retired pilots”, who did a run on the bank right before bankruptcy causing our pension to become insolvent, return their $1.3M plus interest over 15 years, only then will I support “helping” them.
ERflyer is offline  
Old 04-11-2019, 02:37 PM
  #82  
Roll’n Thunder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,816
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
If the “retired pilots”, who did a run on the bank right before bankruptcy causing our pension to become insolvent, return their $1.3M plus interest over 15 years, only then will I support “helping” them.
I think he's more referencing people who have retired post-DB termination up until today.
tennisguru is online now  
Old 04-11-2019, 03:23 PM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,738
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
If the “retired pilots”, who did a run on the bank right before bankruptcy causing our pension to become insolvent, return their $1.3M plus interest over 15 years, only then will I support “helping” them.
Yessir, those boys are living the dream.
badflaps is offline  
Old 04-11-2019, 03:32 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
If the “retired pilots”, who did a run on the bank right before bankruptcy causing our pension to become insolvent, return their $1.3M plus interest over 15 years, only then will I support “helping” them.
The delta pilot DB plan was structurally insolvent. By design. And by our own stupidity. This insolvency was a product of allowing the unqualified component to be literally unfunded in the event the corporation became insolvent.

As to the other qualified component, It would be useful to recall....it wasn’t management that demanded a lump payment feature from a qualified benefit trust structured to pay annuitized benefits. We did that. Management was more than happy to hand us the rope.

Checkers boys. We play checkers.

Management knew exactly what they were doing when they ran into the theater and yelled FIRE!....by announcing the pension was in peril. They accomplished exactly the desired outcome of a run on the bank....allowing the corporation to escape the unqualified payments with the stroke of judges pen, and also escape the qualified obligation in precipitating the exodus of pilots bailing out at the screams of FIRE!

Which depleted the qualified benefit trust to a level that required termination.
BobZ is offline  
Old 04-11-2019, 04:32 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,608
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
If the “retired pilots”, who did a run on the bank right before bankruptcy causing our pension to become insolvent, return their $1.3M plus interest over 15 years, only then will I support “helping” them.
My concern would be for the more recent post termination retirees. Details are lacking in the proposed retirement plan. If the "minimum guaranteed value" referenced in Section 26 of the opener is structured to "make deadzoners whole" within a few years of retirement, that benefit needs to be applied to those retired since emerging from bankruptcy.

I'm not opposed to a higher benefit for older pilots based on the premise of what was lost in bankruptcy. If that is the logic for a large immediate value in the MBCPB, it needs to be applied accordingly and include recent retirees that also fit the definition of "deadzoner".
Gunfighter is offline  
Old 04-11-2019, 04:38 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,738
Default

BobZ, thanks for the simple and accurate chain of events that gave 3500 pilots the life style of a retired city transit employee.
badflaps is offline  
Old 04-11-2019, 05:48 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

Bad...

It’s difficult to imangine our financial ‘experts’ could have served us more poorly. Yet they are here once again peddling the wonders of climbing into bed with management as an ‘improvement’ to retirement security.

It really is completely unbelievable.
BobZ is offline  
Old 04-12-2019, 05:14 AM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,570
Default

Good article from Kiplinger's on Cash Balance Plans:

https://www.kiplinger.com/article/re...nce-plans.html



Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Trip7 is offline  
Old 04-12-2019, 06:24 AM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

Not really relative to our situation.

Just as delta management did not screw themselves out of their own pension plan....a business owner creating his own CBDB plan isnt gona screw themselves.

The CBDB conversions are typically salvage exercises to ward off termination.

Pension plans...of which the CBDB is included are ponzi schemes. At some future date the obligations will eventually overcome the capacity of the corporation to pay.

I wouldnt get back in bed with my employer management for retirement security if my life depended on it.

Wouldnt want some future CEO to once again 'lose sleep' over not tsking enough from this pilot group.
BobZ is offline  
Old 04-12-2019, 06:35 AM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,570
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ
Not really relative to our situation.



Just as delta management did not screw themselves out of their own pension plan....a business owner creating his own CBDB plan isnt gona screw themselves.



The CBDB conversions are typically salvage exercises to ward off termination.



Pension plans...of which the CBDB is included are ponzi schemes. At some future date the obligations will eventually overcome the capacity of the corporation to pay.



I wouldnt get back in bed with my employer management for retirement security if my life depended on it.



Wouldnt want some future CEO to once again 'lose sleep' over not tsking enough from this pilot group.
Excellent point. So far my research has shown these plans are overwhelmingly marketed towards Corporations and Business Owners:

But questions arise. Who are ideal candidates for cash balance plans? What professions make most sense for cash balance plans? Does a cash balance plan make sense for me?
The truth is that there are many companies and professionals who are ideal candidates for cash balance plans. The following are the top 5 ideal candidates for cash balance plans:

Companies with consistent profits (historically and forward looking)

Professional service businesses (doctors, lawyers, CPAs, etc)

Companies looking to improve moraleand employee retention

Owners trying to “catch-up” on retirement savings

Owners looking to maximize tax deductions

https://www.emparion.com/top-ideal-c...balance-plans/

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Trip7 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices