Any Former Southwest, now Happy Delta Pilots?
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 393
Again, depends on age. A 50 year old new hire wont likely see wb ca, but younger new hires still should.
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,994
I don't know, man...37 yo hired right now, living in mid-level seniority domicile ATL? If he's going to have much time as a WB captain there I think it'd be at the very bottom of that category. Might work for some, but not what I'd want to be doing as I ride off into the sunset.
#43
Similar to MSP A320. I’ve been told that in MSP, the A320 used to be a catagory where going to work was like a mini vacation with easy days of flying and long layovers in JAC, PVR, and such.
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Posts: 151
I don't know, man...37 yo hired right now, living in mid-level seniority domicile ATL? If he's going to have much time as a WB captain there I think it'd be at the very bottom of that category. Might work for some, but not what I'd want to be doing as I ride off into the sunset.
I think he's talking WB Captain throughout the system.
#46
Something to consider as well is size of the pilot lists. DL has 14.5k right now, and it will surely grow in time. Perhaps slowly with our upgauging strategy. We’re on pace to hire 1k annually, with +-7k retirements the next 10 years. You’ll probably be at 50% seniority by then.
At SWA what’s the size, nearly 9k? I know hiring there has been something like 600-800 pilots annually. I hear your sim building is expanding, maybe room for future continued future growth. Wild card if SW ever goes longhaul. The retirement big wave will be delayed for years, but will happen. I think there was something like <50 guys under 30yrs old on property (avg older new hires), so you would likely retire at a higher %, especially since you already have 2 years in. To get to 50% in 8 years, you’d need what, 3k-4K retirements based off the growth?
I’m guessing system seniority movement is pretty similar. I’d guess upgrade on 737 at ATL would be faster at DL, since it’s generally Sr at SW. You’d have a great variety of options in general in ATL (HQ/SIM, small NB Jr planes, big NB, WB, etc).
At SWA what’s the size, nearly 9k? I know hiring there has been something like 600-800 pilots annually. I hear your sim building is expanding, maybe room for future continued future growth. Wild card if SW ever goes longhaul. The retirement big wave will be delayed for years, but will happen. I think there was something like <50 guys under 30yrs old on property (avg older new hires), so you would likely retire at a higher %, especially since you already have 2 years in. To get to 50% in 8 years, you’d need what, 3k-4K retirements based off the growth?
I’m guessing system seniority movement is pretty similar. I’d guess upgrade on 737 at ATL would be faster at DL, since it’s generally Sr at SW. You’d have a great variety of options in general in ATL (HQ/SIM, small NB Jr planes, big NB, WB, etc).
#47
On Reserve
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Posts: 15
I was at SW for 4 months and left. Have no regrets. The idea of flying a 737 for 30 years and the way they fly it was not applealing to me. There was a lot more to the decision to leave but am very happy I did when I did. When I left there was guys with 5-8 years there that were leaving. Why? Sure great company and great people but that’s not what I envisioned for myself growing up as a kid wanting to be a pilot. Is there opportunity to make great money ? Sure. The problem was I didn’t want to turn around and go back to the airport after doing MDW FNT MDW CMH MDW MCI kind of days. You only have 1 life, do what makes you happy.
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,916
Last thing I want when I’m 60 is to commute if I lived in ATL.
The only reason I’d bail living in ATL is the possibility of WB flying. If you want to be a FO when you retire, then sure you’ll see it. If you don’t want to commute, odds are you won’t see it as a CA if hired now.
The only reason I’d bail living in ATL is the possibility of WB flying. If you want to be a FO when you retire, then sure you’ll see it. If you don’t want to commute, odds are you won’t see it as a CA if hired now.
#49
Last thing I want when I’m 60 is to commute if I lived in ATL.
The only reason I’d bail living in ATL is the possibility of WB flying. If you want to be a FO when you retire, then sure you’ll see it. If you don’t want to commute, odds are you won’t see it as a CA if hired now.
The only reason I’d bail living in ATL is the possibility of WB flying. If you want to be a FO when you retire, then sure you’ll see it. If you don’t want to commute, odds are you won’t see it as a CA if hired now.
And what does 'widebody' mean in your definition?
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 393
Last thing I want when I’m 60 is to commute if I lived in ATL.
The only reason I’d bail living in ATL is the possibility of WB flying. If you want to be a FO when you retire, then sure you’ll see it. If you don’t want to commute, odds are you won’t see it as a CA if hired now.
The only reason I’d bail living in ATL is the possibility of WB flying. If you want to be a FO when you retire, then sure you’ll see it. If you don’t want to commute, odds are you won’t see it as a CA if hired now.
That being said, again, even in Atlanta it depends on the age of the new hire and if you consider the 75/76 category a widebody. It also depends on what senior people do. There are a lot of senior guys who would rather fly an A320 to retirement vs a 777 or 330. That obviously allows more junior guys to get a 330 or 777 slot that they otherwise wouldn't hold. Too many variables to know exactly what a new hire now will and will not hold years down the road.
Just my 2 cents.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post