Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any Former Southwest, now Happy Delta Pilots? >

Any Former Southwest, now Happy Delta Pilots?

Search

Notices

Any Former Southwest, now Happy Delta Pilots?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-18-2018, 07:49 AM
  #171  
Moderator
 
crewdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,807
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
Age 65 was the ultimate jobs-costing change in recent memory. Clearly that affected not only those wishing to be hired, but those already on the seniority list at nearly every level. Efficiencies and the resulting job losses may feel nebulous to quantify, but don't kid yourself that your life and your earnings aren't affected... even if you already sit above 50%
Hand-in-hand with that was the loss of the pension. While some guys will always work as long as possible, how many guys would already be gone if they still had a pension? This month alone I flew with two guys who are going out early...they're both fNWA who still have a significant, albeit frozen, pension.
crewdawg is offline  
Old 12-18-2018, 07:57 AM
  #172  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,739
Default

It is amazing how useless phone contacts are after the age of 75. Where'd everybody go?
badflaps is offline  
Old 12-18-2018, 08:10 AM
  #173  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,757
Default

Originally Posted by badflaps
It is amazing how useless phone contacts are after the age of 75. Where'd everybody go?
I could crack some jokes about learning to “scroll down” on the Jitterbug, but your point is rather sobering!

(I think about this when retirement RMD discussions pop up too. A big pot of money doesn’t do any good to buy that wakeboard boat at age 80.)
Planetrain is offline  
Old 12-18-2018, 08:16 AM
  #174  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by PilotJ3
With this line of thinking, just get rid of the premium pay all along then.
I'm not even remotely suggesting that. I'm in favor of premium pay for more situations, especially for RR, and don't advocate for a change to GS premium pay.

Let’s just fly 72hrs a month everyone, no pick WS, no GS, no Out of base WS/GS.
Again, not advocating for that. Although a bow wave type system does have its benefits, the biggest one being manpower. Small pockets of triple dip schemes aren't just free money that comes out of executive's private island funds; they are a cost we carry and allocate to a very few while the rest of the group carry that cost.

It’s like those that say “don’t pick up white slips, that’s taking green slip from others”. Everybody have to play their own game. Those that want extra money, can play the game.
Obviously if something is available then some are going to do it. I don't blame them for it. Just like the pump and dump FAE nonsense. For any individual its simply free money. For the group as a whole, there's a high cost to carry the scheme although in the case of the triple dippers I guess you could say some of that cost was made up in the lost jobs it causes. So would you be in favor of selling back/flying on top of vaca? How about a pilot provision to waive all CBA work rules and go to FAR's only? What if a pilot goes to a new plane but is still current on their previous plane...shouldn't we let them "hustle" on both?

Seems that you’re angry because you can’t hold these deals.
Nope. I'm not "mad" that anyone would do it since its there to do. I'm merely saying that its not a one way bonus for a few with no downside.


Do you think the company likes to pay 3 times or just pay straight because they hide a trip from the FOs? The company would love to keep those trips in open time and just assign the training pilot to it.
I'm not suggesting they be allowed to "hide" them and assign to training. I'm in favor of seniority based award of the trips in question followed by a complete buy off with no obligation when its used for training.


All these “job costing” are just excuses. Same excuses that when someone says “we should get monthly vacancy bids” and then some mid seniority person starts screaming “seniority abrogration”.
While I do think we should get more frequent bids (and a complete end to the 365 day conversion nonsense) I'm not sure it has to be monthly. In any case, how would that abrogate one's seniority?
gloopy is offline  
Old 12-19-2018, 02:57 AM
  #175  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 50
Default

Originally Posted by Han Solo
LOL, 12 pages later and this thread could've (should've) ended on the very 1st reply.
I disagree. This one is not that simple at all. There are many things that are, umm, “unique” about SWA.

The OP should take this challenge. Can you find anyone at all who made the SWA to Delta transition who now regrets it?

After that, try to find anyone who made the SWA to FedEx, UPS, UAL, or AA move in the last 10 years who now regrets it. Be sure to get that straight from the source not from a SWA pilot who knows “this guy” or “has this friend” or “heard”.

There are places which afford a pilot a career they can grow into commiserate with age, taking those honed contractual items as they come at hopefully just the right time.

Another particular place in which you likely could grow out of, and one which in all practically shows no sign of any collective commitment to do what it takes for an industry contract to make any of it better despite decades of record profits and decades of past amendable date operations.

It takes a special kind of “pilot” to not grow out of a long career at SWA. I use that term loosely.
A special kind of pilot group to be slow rolled years on each contact and never even consider taking a strike vote let alone anything else. A special kind of pilot to fly 4 legs a day in a guppy for 25 years under the related work rules ( the shards achieved from riding ALPA’s coattails) and not want to make it better enough to do anything about it and instead engage in denial to make themselves feel better about it all. The culture is designed to help you delude yourself to make that process more streamlined and doable. In fact it will make you downright proud of it if the hired the right guy they are so good at doing.

The interview does a fair job of determining the easily co-opted “pilots” who won’t grow out of all those things which are “different” at SW. Management uses buzzwords like they hire for “Soft Skills”.

For the rest...well they just gotta tough it out somehow once that seniorityometer is past V1 and they then realize they should have tried bail sooner in the game yet after it’s too late.

The Stepford smiles of myriad SWA pilots has a lot to do with factors many pilots on the outside can’t begin to fathom. Think Amway culture with Proctor & Gamble’s spreadsheet.

In my opinion anyone making this particular decision needs to be thinking about a hell of a lot more than just where they want to live.

Last edited by Get Real; 12-19-2018 at 03:17 AM.
Get Real is offline  
Old 12-19-2018, 03:48 AM
  #176  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by Get Real

It takes a special kind of “pilot” to not grow out of a long career at SWA. I use that term loosely.
A special kind of pilot group to be slow rolled years on each contact and never even consider taking a strike vote let alone anything else. A special kind of pilot to fly 4 legs a day in a guppy for 25 years under the related work rules ( the shards achieved from riding ALPA’s coattails) and not want to make it better enough to do anything about it and instead engage in denial to make themselves feel better about it all. The culture is designed to help you delude yourself to make that process more streamlined and doable. In fact it will make you downright proud of it if the hired the right guy they are so good at doing.
You seem very bitter.
Baradium is offline  
Old 12-19-2018, 05:18 AM
  #177  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 659
Default

Originally Posted by Get Real
I disagree. This one is not that simple at all. There are many things that are, umm, “unique” about SWA.

The OP should take this challenge. Can you find anyone at all who made the SWA to Delta transition who now regrets it?

After that, try to find anyone who made the SWA to FedEx, UPS, UAL, or AA move in the last 10 years who now regrets it. Be sure to get that straight from the source not from a SWA pilot who knows “this guy” or “has this friend” or “heard”.

There are places which afford a pilot a career they can grow into commiserate with age, taking those honed contractual items as they come at hopefully just the right time.

Another particular place in which you likely could grow out of, and one which in all practically shows no sign of any collective commitment to do what it takes for an industry contract to make any of it better despite decades of record profits and decades of past amendable date operations.

It takes a special kind of “pilot” to not grow out of a long career at SWA. I use that term loosely.
A special kind of pilot group to be slow rolled years on each contact and never even consider taking a strike vote let alone anything else. A special kind of pilot to fly 4 legs a day in a guppy for 25 years under the related work rules ( the shards achieved from riding ALPA’s coattails) and not want to make it better enough to do anything about it and instead engage in denial to make themselves feel better about it all. The culture is designed to help you delude yourself to make that process more streamlined and doable. In fact it will make you downright proud of it if the hired the right guy they are so good at doing.

The interview does a fair job of determining the easily co-opted “pilots” who won’t grow out of all those things which are “different” at SW. Management uses buzzwords like they hire for “Soft Skills”.

For the rest...well they just gotta tough it out somehow once that seniorityometer is past V1 and they then realize they should have tried bail sooner in the game yet after it’s too late.

The Stepford smiles of myriad SWA pilots has a lot to do with factors many pilots on the outside can’t begin to fathom. Think Amway culture with Proctor & Gamble’s spreadsheet.

In my opinion anyone making this particular decision needs to be thinking about a hell of a lot more than just where they want to live.
One of the most pathetic things I’ve ever read.
Peacock is offline  
Old 12-19-2018, 05:20 AM
  #178  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,994
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium
You seem very bitter.
So..... he's a SWA pilot above V1?
TED74 is offline  
Old 12-19-2018, 09:57 AM
  #179  
Strike averted!
 
at6d's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: B737
Posts: 3,781
Default

Originally Posted by Get Real
I disagree. This one is not that simple at all. There are many things that are, umm, “unique” about SWA.

The OP should take this challenge. Can you find anyone at all who made the SWA to Delta transition who now regrets it?

After that, try to find anyone who made the SWA to FedEx, UPS, UAL, or AA move in the last 10 years who now regrets it. Be sure to get that straight from the source not from a SWA pilot who knows “this guy” or “has this friend” or “heard”.

There are places which afford a pilot a career they can grow into commiserate with age, taking those honed contractual items as they come at hopefully just the right time.

Another particular place in which you likely could grow out of, and one which in all practically shows no sign of any collective commitment to do what it takes for an industry contract to make any of it better despite decades of record profits and decades of past amendable date operations.

It takes a special kind of “pilot” to not grow out of a long career at SWA. I use that term loosely.
A special kind of pilot group to be slow rolled years on each contact and never even consider taking a strike vote let alone anything else. A special kind of pilot to fly 4 legs a day in a guppy for 25 years under the related work rules ( the shards achieved from riding ALPA’s coattails) and not want to make it better enough to do anything about it and instead engage in denial to make themselves feel better about it all. The culture is designed to help you delude yourself to make that process more streamlined and doable. In fact it will make you downright proud of it if the hired the right guy they are so good at doing.

The interview does a fair job of determining the easily co-opted “pilots” who won’t grow out of all those things which are “different” at SW. Management uses buzzwords like they hire for “Soft Skills”.

For the rest...well they just gotta tough it out somehow once that seniorityometer is past V1 and they then realize they should have tried bail sooner in the game yet after it’s too late.

The Stepford smiles of myriad SWA pilots has a lot to do with factors many pilots on the outside can’t begin to fathom. Think Amway culture with Proctor & Gamble’s spreadsheet.

In my opinion anyone making this particular decision needs to be thinking about a hell of a lot more than just where they want to live.
Wow. Aren’t you SWA?

And why call us “pilots” in quotes?

I always knew I was special!

Uh, thanks ALPA? I guess?
at6d is offline  
Old 12-19-2018, 11:03 AM
  #180  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 50
Default

Sorry for the spelling typos in last post.

Actually I’m not biter whatsoever. The choices I made were mine. You make the bed you sleep in.

Pathetic? Well if someone who is past V1 can honestly admit they have a regret in order to give perspective in order to potentially help others then okay.

So would it be less pathetic to embrace my current situation with ego attachment, slip into denial, and go on to tell everyone that working at SWA is a wash (compared to some OALs) once domicile locations are factored out?

Thank ALPA (and APA)? You bet your sweet A55 I do, as anyone at SWA should in spades....probably more so than ALPA members themselves.

Every contractual advance of real substance we have ever achieved during my tenure was captured because a ALPA or APA group was so far out in front that the mediator couldn’t ignore it. Our sub industry narrow body results are improvements for us. Sub industry even though we consistently have the best company financials and should be the hands down leader in every segment for narrow body guys.

It’s about to happen again also. AA, DL, and UAL all come up before our 9/2020 amendable date. We have no plan for leverage other than “but look at what they got.” And what some on the outside may not be able to believe is we really only cherry pick those items so that now doing something like a honest 30 year career value comparison would be so ego traumatic for SWAPA that it can’t be broached with integrity. The inbox of things we need for parity is stacked 18 feet. Swapa uses uneducated polls as the work around and the company culture works with that seamlessly. We will again be dragged out years past our date and settle for another sub industry deal like we always have and every time. Spirit is nipping at our heals on their last deal.

The contract stuff is just one facet of a decision but I’m addressing it because of the “Thank ALPA” comment. The pilot group at SWA practically assures our ongoing contractual paradigm won’t ever be fixed.

Last edited by Get Real; 12-19-2018 at 11:13 AM.
Get Real is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
astroglydenn
Flexjet
6
05-16-2018 03:49 AM
Tsanford134
Major
226
10-22-2017 11:56 PM
newKnow
Delta
80
08-23-2015 11:10 PM
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
RPC Unity
Union Talk
149
06-30-2011 08:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices