Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any Former Southwest, now Happy Delta Pilots? >

Any Former Southwest, now Happy Delta Pilots?

Search

Notices

Any Former Southwest, now Happy Delta Pilots?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2018, 11:50 AM
  #161  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
If I am not mistaken, there was a proposal in TA1 that would have - in effect - amounted to the same thing. But to reiterate, you would be in favor of NOT allowing any pilot to pick up a trip if said pilot were to be bought off of a trip for an OE.
TA1 said that company could pull trips that LCA bid on and make them unavailable to PBS for the FO's for the express purpose of training, thereby eliminating them as available trips to the FO's right from the start.
As always, the pendulum seems to swing wildly in either direction.
full of luv is offline  
Old 12-17-2018, 04:31 PM
  #162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
You got that right.

This grand illusion that everyone can theoretically triple dip because a tiny fraction can is costing us all jobs and the company loves it.

Not to mention that we got that benefit back by throwing new hires under the bus (which also cost us jobs) but obvsly they need to shut up and pay them dues etc.

I get the emotional lure of sea lawyer "good deals" like this. Just like the pump and dump lump sump crowd played money ball for a year or three and punched out for life. Municipals will literally riot before they give that up and hey, why not, its free money.

For us though, there's a cost to these kinds of things. I wouldn't just give it away for justice etc. But why should we pay (and we do) for a massive benefit for a tiny few when the entire group is still lacking across the board?

Of course triple dip tricks are supposedly the reason why everyone rockets swiftly up the list to hold 7 figure 350 hedge fund baller gigs.

If you get bought off, full pay and no obligation, I'm fine with that being enough.
So then let's do away with any premium pay at all. Your line comes out, you fly it. Done.

And I have yuge news for you. In this next contract, newhires won't be the ones that are anywhere near bus wheels.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 12-17-2018, 04:32 PM
  #163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
TA1 said that company could pull trips that LCA bid on and make them unavailable to PBS for the FO's for the express purpose of training, thereby eliminating them as available trips to the FO's right from the start.
As always, the pendulum seems to swing wildly in either direction.
Both positions had to be vacant. I really think that was much ado about nothing.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 12-17-2018, 07:52 PM
  #164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,760
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
Both positions had to be vacant. I really think that was much ado about nothing.
You are confusing the TA1 23.G5 with the new actual rules for unbid Open A/ Open B trips (which can be pulled for OE if no one bids on them after the first PCS run).

Just as luv recalls, TA1 had the provision where LCA-bid trips would be pulled from the pot before the monthly B PBS was run. The hugely toxic fact that the trip couldn’t be bid on by any copilots (in addition to the hope for the B getting released from said trip with pay), was a big hurdle for the memrat.
Planetrain is offline  
Old 12-17-2018, 09:12 PM
  #165  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
Both positions had to be vacant. I really think that was much ado about nothing.
Correct on TA2, and completely incorrect on TA1.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 12-18-2018, 04:49 AM
  #166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

OK... I flushed it all anyway. I do remember that I believed it was not much of a big deal because there was such a restriction on it.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 12-18-2018, 06:20 AM
  #167  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
OK... I flushed it all anyway. I do remember that I believed it was not much of a big deal because there was such a restriction on it.
There was a restriction on the percentage of trips that could be pulled.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 12-18-2018, 07:05 AM
  #168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,371
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
You got that right.

This grand illusion that everyone can theoretically triple dip because a tiny fraction can is costing us all jobs and the company loves it.

Not to mention that we got that benefit back by throwing new hires under the bus (which also cost us jobs) but obvsly they need to shut up and pay them dues etc.

I get the emotional lure of sea lawyer "good deals" like this. Just like the pump and dump lump sump crowd played money ball for a year or three and punched out for life. Municipals will literally riot before they give that up and hey, why not, its free money.

For us though, there's a cost to these kinds of things. I wouldn't just give it away for justice etc. But why should we pay (and we do) for a massive benefit for a tiny few when the entire group is still lacking across the board?

Of course triple dip tricks are supposedly the reason why everyone rockets swiftly up the list to hold 7 figure 350 hedge fund baller gigs.

If you get bought off, full pay and no obligation, I'm fine with that being enough.
With this line of thinking, just get rid of the premium pay all along then. Let’s just fly 72hrs a month everyone, no pick WS, no GS, no Out of base WS/GS.

It’s like those that say “don’t pick up white slips, that’s taking green slip from others”. Everybody have to play their own game. Those that want extra money, can play the game.

Personally I’ve only triple dipped once. It worked out for my commute, so I did it. Other times I just pass the opportunity because I enjoy my time home. But these good things in our contract have to stay. Those who are workaholics can keep making all the money they want.

Seems that you’re angry because you can’t hold these deals.

Do you think the company likes to pay 3 times or just pay straight because they hide a trip from the FOs? The company would love to keep those trips in open time and just assign the training pilot to it.

All these “job costing” are just excuses. Same excuses that when someone says “we should get monthly vacancy bids” and then some mid seniority person starts screaming “seniority abrogration”.
PilotJ3 is offline  
Old 12-18-2018, 07:16 AM
  #169  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,238
Default

Originally Posted by PilotJ3
With this line of thinking, just get rid of the premium pay all along then. Let’s just fly 72hrs a month everyone, no pick WS, no GS, no Out of base WS/GS.

It’s like those that say “don’t pick up white slips, that’s taking green slip from others”. Everybody have to play their own game. Those that want extra money, can play the game.

Personally I’ve only triple dipped once. It worked out for my commute, so I did it. Other times I just pass the opportunity because I enjoy my time home. But these good things in our contract have to stay. Those who are workaholics can keep making all the money they want.

Seems that you’re angry because you can’t hold these deals.

Do you think the company likes to pay 3 times or just pay straight because they hide a trip from the FOs? The company would love to keep those trips in open time and just assign the training pilot to it.

All these “job costing” are just excuses. Same excuses that when someone says “we should get monthly vacancy bids” and then some mid seniority person starts screaming “seniority abrogration”.
Exactly this. I understand we need to look out for each other, but to what extent? Should we all cut our flying in half and take a 50% paycut so the company can hire more pilots?
m3113n1a1 is offline  
Old 12-18-2018, 07:28 AM
  #170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,994
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
Exactly this. I understand we need to look out for each other, but to what extent? Should we all cut our flying in half and take a 50% paycut so the company can hire more pilots?
To clarify, more jobs doesn't just mean hire more pilots. It means your services are needed in a better-paying category, or a more appealing category, or having better seniority in your current category.

Your question is an extreme one with an obvious answer, "No." Less clear is if a 5% paycut might be worth advancing 10% up your category list, or making your next big jump to another category (or first captain upgrade) 6 months earlier than you could otherwise.

Age 65 was the ultimate jobs-costing change in recent memory. Clearly that affected not only those wishing to be hired, but those already on the seniority list at nearly every level. Efficiencies and the resulting job losses may feel nebulous to quantify, but don't kid yourself that your life and your earnings aren't affected... even if you already sit above 50%
TED74 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
astroglydenn
Flexjet
6
05-16-2018 03:49 AM
Tsanford134
Major
226
10-22-2017 11:56 PM
newKnow
Delta
80
08-23-2015 11:10 PM
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
RPC Unity
Union Talk
149
06-30-2011 08:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices