Search

Notices

Dalpa R&I Roadshow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2018, 04:30 PM
  #331  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,760
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq
You can even keep that "lost" week for C2020 if you pay me 5+15 for each and every day of my current 5 weeks.

See....that's reasonable. Merely asking for a 140% increase for the first 2 weeks and 150% for the remaining 3 weeks. 🤔
A 140% increase would be 9 hours/day. A 40% increase would be 5:15.
Planetrain is offline  
Old 09-24-2018, 04:58 PM
  #332  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,614
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
1) Never finance a depreciating asset. Ever. That is stoopid. Fairly good advice, although the argument could be made that investing $30K in xyz investment while financing your car at 1.9% may be worth considering.
I agree with you and pay cash for my cars. They always seem to drive better without a payment.

2) Pay off any and ALL debt. Debt is slavery. This is 100% true of consumer debt.
When considering leveraged investments in appreciating income producing assets, it can be the invisible hand that creates wealth.

3) Backdoor Roth doesn't work for everybody. If you are 'high income earner' it won't work for you either.There are several examples to refute this absolute statement. You may fing you are also high income in retirement due to RMDs, second income. taxable pension, etc. See below for an even better reason, especially if you are a high earner and hit with the upper limit on investing retirement funds.

Under option 2, you pay more to Uncle Sam, but your disposable income is greater.
One aspect of Roth that has been overlooked, yet is the reason for this thread's existence, is that there is a finite amount of money you can put into tax advantaged accounts. 55K is the max limit this year. By investing in Roth accounts, you are prepaying your income taxes and effectively raising the retirement contribution limit by the amount of those income taxes.

The following example assumes that contributions are invested identically whether in Roth or Traditional accounts. You max out the 55K limit annually and have $3.3 Million in the account at retirement. Your retirement tax rate is only 25% You plan on taking $220K out per year during retirement. This equates to roughly 7% per year and should get you to 90 years or older.

Under the DC and Traditional 401K option, your $220,000 withdrawal will cost $55,000 of income taxes and leave you $165,000 to live on.

If you took advantage of the MBD Roth option and put 45K in via Roth and only 10K via DC contributions each year, you would still have the same $3.3 Million. The annual $220,000 withdrawal would include $180,000 of Roth funds and $40,000 from traditional funds, triggering $10K of income tax. Your net spendable income would be $210,000.

If your tax rate in retirement is higher than 25%, the difference is even greater. You may even find that RMDs push you into a higher tax bracket.

People who are against the Roth often overlook that prepaying taxes during the working years is equivalent to investing more money. It is the financial equivalent of having a higher contribution limit. This is especially true for pilots who are currently in the 24% tax bracket (Married <315K AGI)
Gunfighter is offline  
Old 09-24-2018, 05:27 PM
  #333  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
One aspect of Roth that has been overlooked, yet is the reason for this thread's existence, is that there is a finite amount of money you can put into tax advantaged accounts. 55K is the max limit this year. By investing in Roth accounts, you are prepaying your income taxes and effectively raising the retirement contribution limit by the amount of those income taxes.

The following example assumes that contributions are invested identically whether in Roth or Traditional accounts. You max out the 55K limit annually and have $3.3 Million in the account at retirement. Your retirement tax rate is only 25% You plan on taking $220K out per year during retirement. This equates to roughly 7% per year and should get you to 90 years or older.

Under the DC and Traditional 401K option, your $220,000 withdrawal will cost $55,000 of income taxes and leave you $165,000 to live on.

If you took advantage of the MBD Roth option and put 45K in via Roth and only 10K via DC contributions each year, you would still have the same $3.3 Million. The annual $220,000 withdrawal would include $180,000 of Roth funds and $40,000 from traditional funds, triggering $10K of income tax. Your net spendable income would be $210,000.

If your tax rate in retirement is higher than 25%, the difference is even greater. You may even find that RMDs push you into a higher tax bracket.

People who are against the Roth often overlook that prepaying taxes during the working years is equivalent to investing more money. It is the financial equivalent of having a higher contribution limit. This is especially true for pilots who are currently in the 24% tax bracket (Married <315K AGI)
How does it compare if you stayed conventional and invested the money you would have paid upfront for taxes in a S&P500 fund?
sailingfun is offline  
Old 09-24-2018, 05:35 PM
  #334  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,760
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
One aspect of Roth that has been overlooked, yet is the reason for this thread's existence, is that there is a finite amount of money you can put into tax advantaged accounts. 55K is the max limit this year. By investing in Roth accounts, you are prepaying your income taxes and effectively raising the retirement contribution limit by the amount of those income taxes.

The following example assumes that contributions are invested identically whether in Roth or Traditional accounts. You max out the 55K limit annually and have $3.3 Million in the account at retirement. Your retirement tax rate is only 25% You plan on taking $220K out per year during retirement. This equates to roughly 7% per year and should get you to 90 years or older.

Under the DC and Traditional 401K option, your $220,000 withdrawal will cost $55,000 of income taxes and leave you $165,000 to live on.

If you took advantage of the MBD Roth option and put 45K in via Roth and only 10K via DC contributions each year, you would still have the same $3.3 Million. The annual $220,000 withdrawal would include $180,000 of Roth funds and $40,000 from traditional funds, triggering $10K of income tax. Your net spendable income would be $210,000.

If your tax rate in retirement is higher than 25%, the difference is even greater. You may even find that RMDs push you into a higher tax bracket.

People who are against the Roth often overlook that prepaying taxes during the working years is equivalent to investing more money. It is the financial equivalent of having a higher contribution limit. This is especially true for pilots who are currently in the 24% tax bracket (Married <315K AGI)
Its not a fair comparison to say you can invest $55k either in Roth or traditional. Since you "prepay" tax in MBD Roth, its really $55k traditional or $41,800 MBD Roth ($55k+24%tax). In your example of $45k Roth, you would need to back out the taxes in your PV to legitamatly analyze the tax benefits in FV.

Another wrinkle for Roth is if you live in a high tax state like NY and retire to a no income state like FL.

Last edited by Planetrain; 09-24-2018 at 05:46 PM.
Planetrain is offline  
Old 09-24-2018, 07:33 PM
  #335  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,614
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
How does it compare if you stayed conventional and invested the money you would have paid upfront for taxes in a S&P500 fund?

If you retire in the same tax bracket, you lose out by the amount of capital gains taxes and any income taxes paid on dividends during the holding period. If you move down about 5-6% in tax bracket you come out even. If you move down more than 6-8% in tax bracket, you start to see some advantage with investing the income taxes vs prepaying retirement taxes in a Roth.

As a general rule, if you are in the 24% marginal tax bracket the MBD makes sense. If you are in the 35% it may not. At 32% you fall in the middle, but would benefit from the flexibility of investing outside of a retirement plan.


Points to Ponder
-If you are in a married tax bracket now, becoming single (not qualifying widower) in retirement would put you in a higher bracket on lower income.
-Do you think the recent reduction in income tax rates will hold through retirement?
-Do you anticipate a return to higher tax rates?
-300K was taxed at 33% last year, now 300K is taxed at 24%
-What if your income tax bracket is higher in retirement?
-What if we implement a national consumption tax vs an income tax?

There are so many variables, that no one answer is always right.
Gunfighter is offline  
Old 09-24-2018, 07:58 PM
  #336  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,614
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain
Its not a fair comparison to say you can invest $55k either in Roth or traditional. Since you "prepay" tax in MBD Roth, its really $55k traditional or $41,800 MBD Roth ($55k+24%tax). In your example of $45k Roth, you would need to back out the taxes in your PV to legitamatly analyze the tax benefits in FV.

Another wrinkle for Roth is if you live in a high tax state like NY and retire to a no income state like FL.
You missed the point, yet grasped it all at the same time. Look at the numbers in reverse. Putting $55,000 in a MBD is equivalent to $72,368 in a Traditional. With only a 55K contribution limit, you can't do it. The MBD Roth is equivalent to having a higher contribution limit. This whole R&I Roadshow is about finding a way to shelter money above the 55K limit. Retaining the MBD option does that for a large segment of the pilot group, yet they are presenting a plan that effectively holds those funds hostage in a 5% MBCBP.

If your retirement tax rate is the same as your working tax rate, using a traditional plan and investing the "prepaid taxes" leaves you behind by the amount of capital gains taxes you pay. Disparate tax rates while working in retirement change the equation. It takes about a 5% drop in retirement tax rate to balance out.

If you live and work in NY, but plan to retire in FL, it is probably better to pay taxes in retirement. If you live in FL, but plan to retire in NY, you have bigger problems to worry about.
Gunfighter is offline  
Old 09-24-2018, 10:55 PM
  #337  
Optimized
 
Gooner's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 394
Default

I am fully onboard with more. I care less about hitting some magical ROR or if I can buy toys that a 80 year old shouldn’t have in retirement. But I feel as we have broken the wrong issue down with this debate.

If we are sitting at the negotiating table with the company and the offer is 20% DC and the rest status quo or 17% DC and 7% towards a tax deferred plan, that the company says let’s them give more money to us than Uncle Sam, isn’t the argument moot.

I get that there are Trip7 among us who are gifted investors and and want more money to leverage to make millions, but if you’re that savvy you’ll find a way with the new deal as well.

That said; it must be in my name with transparency about how much is mine at all times, and as far from union control as can be, trust runs thin with a big pot of money.
Gooner is offline  
Old 09-25-2018, 02:33 AM
  #338  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,149
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain
A 140% increase would be 9 hours/day. A 40% increase would be 5:15.
Always wondered why I landed with so much gas. Public schooling and that poli sci major fail me again. 😁
FL370esq is offline  
Old 09-25-2018, 05:12 AM
  #339  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,598
Default

I am a pilot, not a gifted investor. A pilot does not need to be gifted investor to a beat a low risk MBCBP plan that is not under your control. A simple lazy portfolio of 60% S&P 500 index and 40% Bond Index would likely beat the after tax returns of the MBCBP. And best part is its all under your control.

Thankfully I think there's already been enough backlash to kill of further pursuit of the MBCBP. One very sharp pilot posted on FB Widget page how little extra return you need to beat the MBCBP. He even included formulas to back up his work, something the R&I Committee failed to do.
Trip7 is offline  
Old 09-25-2018, 05:18 AM
  #340  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
I am a pilot, not a gifted investor. A pilot does not need to be gifted investor to a beat a low risk MBCBP plan that is not under your control. A simple lazy portfolio of 60% S&P 500 index and 40% Bond Index would likely beat the after tax returns of the MBCBP. And best part is its all under your control.

Thankfully I think there's already been enough backlash to kill of further pursuit of the MBCBP. One very sharp pilot posted on FB Widget page how little extra return you need to beat the MBCBP. He even included formulas to back up his work, something the R&I Committee failed to do.
Investing in bonds is lunacy, especially if you are under the age of 65. dyodd, ymmv, etc etc etc
JamesBond is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DALFA
Delta
30
09-21-2016 09:29 AM
newKnow
Delta
78
12-07-2015 08:03 AM
TonyC
FedEx
72
10-12-2015 05:46 AM
gzsg
Delta
10296
07-10-2015 01:42 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices