Search

Notices

Dalpa R&I Roadshow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2018, 03:28 PM
  #261  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: The Beginnings
Posts: 1,317
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain
Heres some starters

Headset allowance
Commuting allowance
Luggage allowance
Home internet allowance
Cell phone allowance
Laptop allowance

When does that imputed income come into play?

Commuting is a choice. (moved 12 times when I was a kid, lived in 3 different states, 8 different school districts...it's not as traumatic as they say).

Headsets: Company provided.

Cell phone: Not required (ACARS/Jetway phone/Atlanta Radio/Satphone)

Laptop: Company provided.

Or was this a joke? Just curious?
deltabound is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 05:04 PM
  #262  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,535
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
That you control those 401k investments is NOT the point. That 16% has no choice but to go into your 401k... If there is a retirement plan for it to go into, why should you get it as DPSP CSH? The only reason you get it now is because there is no alternative.

Denny
because that's what the PWA says.
tunes is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 06:06 PM
  #263  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by tunes
because that's what the PWA says.
I'd be interested in exactly where the PWA says this... We get the 16% in DPSP CSH because it has to go somewhere when the 401k is full and there is no retirement plan for it to go into, we don't just lose it.

Being that the 16% is earmarked for retirement and, with this new plan, there would be a retirement plan for the Company retirement contribution to go into, shouldn't it go there?

Isn't this fun!

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 06:07 PM
  #264  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,535
Default Dalpa R&I Roadshow

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
I'd be interested in exactly where the PWA says this... We get the 16% in DPSP CSH because it has to go somewhere, we don't just lose it.



Being that the 16% is earmarked for retirement and, with this new plan, there would be a retirement plan for the Company retirement contribution to go into, shouldn't it go there?



Isn't this fun!



Denny


26.m.8 i think when I looked earlier. If not 8 it's somewhere around there in 26.m

If I weren't on my phone I'd copy/paste it but it basically says excess from IRS limits is paid out in cash


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
tunes is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 06:16 PM
  #265  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by tunes
26.m.8 i think when I looked earlier. If not 8 it's somewhere around there in 26.m

If I weren't on my phone I'd copy/paste it but it basically says excess from IRS limits is paid out in cash


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In excess of the IRS limits etc., OK. It's prevented from going into a 401k type retirement plan. The individual cannot elect to take the 16% on their own before either maxing out contributions or meeting the $275,000 limit. Where the 16% goes is not optional now.

Why should a company retirement contribution that is not optional now suddenly become optional (as to how one receives it) if there is a new retirement plan for it to go into?

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 06:41 PM
  #266  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,535
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
In excess of the IRS limits etc., OK. It's prevented from going into a 401k type retirement plan. The individual cannot elect to take the 16% on their own before either maxing out contributions or meeting the $275,000 limit. Where the 16% goes is not optional now.

Why should a company retirement contribution that is not optional now suddenly become optional (as to how one receives it) if there is a new retirement plan for it to go into?

Denny
I guess I'm not following you..Now I don't make $275k but I get DPSP because of taking advantage of the 401a. I can then take that DPSP and invest elsewhere, whether it be Real Estate or anything else, hell could just blow it on something.

With this new plan, i could still do the 401a thing (I assume) but that excess that I was going to invest elsewhere now goes into something that I don't think is a benefit to me personally because a. i have no control over it and b. the way it was presented the target gains are paltry.

In current world, I get to say where my 16% is going because i've played the game and maxed out IRS limits.

In the new scenario, I don't get to say where my 16% is going because I've maxed out the IRS limits but DALPA has put a policy in place to direct that excess that was previously cash to me.
tunes is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 06:48 PM
  #267  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,760
Default

Originally Posted by deltabound
Commuting is a choice. (moved 12 times when I was a kid, lived in 3 different states, 8 different school districts...it's not as traumatic as they say).

Headsets: Company provided.

Cell phone: Not required (ACARS/Jetway phone/Atlanta Radio/Satphone)

Laptop: Company provided.

Or was this a joke? Just curious?
It was a list of soft money items the company could pay for (like per diem) for items used in the course of business that we otherwise now can't deduct do to the 2018 tax re-write which destroyed Form 2106, unreimbursed business expenses. If the company gave me tax free money for "Internet at home", or reimbursed me, or gave free access to, that would be a nice addition to avoid taxes. Am I the only one who doesn't fully spend their per diem? (Foot stomp)

The only joke is I'm sure we'd be slapped with imputed income.
Planetrain is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 07:42 PM
  #268  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,614
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain
The only joke is I'm sure we'd be slapped with imputed income.
We would get hit with imputed income on items that are not necessary for performance of our job. The laptop and headset would be a hard sell because of the company provided iPad and airplane headsets. Cell phone allowance (reserve call out, Inverse Assignment, IROPS, etc), dry cleaning, uniforms, luggage and maybe even Global Entry are all work required expenses.
Gunfighter is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 09:29 PM
  #269  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

Originally Posted by tunes
I guess I'm not following you..Now I don't make $275k but I get DPSP because of taking advantage of the 401a. I can then take that DPSP and invest elsewhere, whether it be Real Estate or anything else, hell could just blow it on something.

With this new plan, i could still do the 401a thing (I assume) but that excess that I was going to invest elsewhere now goes into something that I don't think is a benefit to me personally because a. i have no control over it and b. the way it was presented the target gains are paltry.

In current world, I get to say where my 16% is going because i've played the game and maxed out IRS limits.

In the new scenario, I don't get to say where my 16% is going because I've maxed out the IRS limits but DALPA has put a policy in place to direct that excess that was previously cash to me.
Change DALPA to your fellow pilots have decided they want a additional retirement vehicle and your statement is correct. The majority will decide.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 09-21-2018, 09:51 PM
  #270  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,456
Default

A single question.

Is an increase in retirement percentage an increase in company funded retirement or just a pay raise that you must pay taxes and dues on?

Eventually I hope to well exceed the 401k earnings limits through 20+% DC and earnings that increase contract after contract, so then what? I think we either need another vehicle or need to make DPSP cash part of regular wages. Maximize our current plan first, but needing a plan to absorb additional retirement money in a tax advantaged way is a problem I want to have.
notEnuf is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DALFA
Delta
30
09-21-2016 09:29 AM
newKnow
Delta
78
12-07-2015 08:03 AM
TonyC
FedEx
72
10-12-2015 05:46 AM
gzsg
Delta
10296
07-10-2015 01:42 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices