C Series Info
08-30-2017, 10:49 AM
#494
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: Left
Posts: 1,816
....yet???????? The aircraft will be great with or without a HUD (even though I would prefer it as an option). Thanks for the update.
08-30-2017, 11:34 AM
#495
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Posts: 1,898
The Delta site says max range is 1938NM.
Bombardier says max range is 3100NM.
Both are full pax, 2 class cabin, reserves.
Also, the climb performance page shows the CS100 as having worse climb performance than an A321. Seriously?
I think someone should let route planning know that the airplane can fly transcons...
...Still no base decision???
Last edited by flyallnite; 08-30-2017 at 11:47 AM.
08-30-2017, 11:47 AM
#496
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: Left
Posts: 1,816
Huh.. not surprised about the HUDs. I am surprised at what seems to be some erroneous performance info...
The Delta site says max range is 1938NM.
Bombardier says max range is 3100NM.
Both are full pax, 2 class cabin.
Also, the climb performance page shows the CS100 as having worse climb performance than an A321. Seriously?
I think someone should let route planning know that the airplane can fly transcons...
...Still no base decision???
The Delta site says max range is 1938NM.
Bombardier says max range is 3100NM.
Both are full pax, 2 class cabin.
Also, the climb performance page shows the CS100 as having worse climb performance than an A321. Seriously?
I think someone should let route planning know that the airplane can fly transcons...
...Still no base decision???
08-30-2017, 12:26 PM
#497
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Here and there
Posts: 1,906
Here's hoping that's the case.
08-30-2017, 12:49 PM
#498
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Posts: 1,898
It's still a CAT IIIb airplane without the HUD. I'm more surprised by the range circles that are laughably out of whack. Wonder what's up with that?
08-30-2017, 12:58 PM
#499
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Huh.. not surprised about the HUDs. I am surprised at what seems to be some erroneous performance info...
The Delta site says max range is 1938NM.
Bombardier says max range is 3100NM.
Both are full pax, 2 class cabin, reserves.
Also, the climb performance page shows the CS100 as having worse climb performance than an A321. Seriously?
I think someone should let route planning know that the airplane can fly transcons...
...Still no base decision???
The Delta site says max range is 1938NM.
Bombardier says max range is 3100NM.
Both are full pax, 2 class cabin, reserves.
Also, the climb performance page shows the CS100 as having worse climb performance than an A321. Seriously?
I think someone should let route planning know that the airplane can fly transcons...
...Still no base decision???
As to the HUDs, if every CAT II and III is a autoland anyways then there really isn't a need for a HUD. So it makes sense.
08-30-2017, 01:05 PM
#500
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Captain
Posts: 829
It is capable of the longer range (3000nm) if Delta decides to buy it. DAL had indicated earlier that they might be going with the shorter range. No idea what the cost difference is between the two.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
