Search

Notices

C Series Info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2019, 02:28 PM
  #3641  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,142
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I never saw the 737-800 trim on its own during takeoff. Was never taught any mode where it would do that.
Either very poor training, or you have forgotten. Google 737 speed trim on takeoff. It’s a real thing.
waldo135 is offline  
Old 06-25-2019, 02:30 PM
  #3642  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

After a while It becomes transparent on the ng. At first it does register.
BobZ is offline  
Old 06-25-2019, 02:35 PM
  #3643  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 226
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I never saw the 737-800 trim on its own during takeoff. Was never taught any mode where it would do that.
After takeoff it will sometimes
Delta2heavy is offline  
Old 06-25-2019, 03:03 PM
  #3644  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,538
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
...control force[s] required were different enough from the NG that MCAS was the solution to maintain a common type rating.
That's whay I've read as well, except the "different enough" was merely mandated extra sim time, not necessarily a new type rating. Since operators were freaking out over the possibility of anything other than "train by memo" then that's how the whole thing came about.

I find it hard to believe the difference in feel from NG to MAX would be vastly greater than that between 777 and 787 (didn't one airline finagle their way into a "common type" for those? Anyway the 757-2 and 3 and 767-2 and 3, or 88 and 90, or 318 19 20 21 21NEO 21LR 21XLR, or a 737-100 and a 737-900 etc. From what I've read there was a difference, but it wasn't that much and I can't imagine was radically more than existing differences in common types.

Regardless of the degree to which it was different, there is never under any circumstance a compelling reason to roll in full nose down trim that creates a load based unrecoverable scenario.
gloopy is offline  
Old 06-25-2019, 03:19 PM
  #3645  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I also omitted the Qantas A330 that was saved only buy superb crew action but still resulted in a large number of critical injuries. There was also the Lufthansa test flight that crashed killing the crew after 2 AOA vanes malfunctioned.
MCAS was designed to make the MAX handle like the NG in one particular corner of the flight envelope never normally approached in airline operations. There is nothing inheritantly wrong with the airframe and the fix will take care of the malfunction. If you feel as you appear to by your post I would avoid the A330-900 since it has a similar problem corrected by software. Both designs moved the engines forward and up for ground clearance.
The QF32 story is a good TEM study for anyone, but especially Airbus pilots.

I didn't pay attention to it because it was an A380 and I fly the 320, but a lot of what happened had similarities and we should all pay attention to what they did.

First the incident was caused by a misaligned boring of a stub pipe in the #2 RR Trent engine on the airplane. It was a QC issue not a design issue.

Not long after takeoff the engine exploded with 500 shrapnel hits on the jet, 650 wires cut, I believe every system compromised and several tires blown in the well.

They had 100 ECAMs to run and no way to talk to Qantas.

And all of these ECAMS were sent to Qantas fwiw. They're sitting in their OCC equivalent looking at all of these ECAMs going what in the hell is going on here? And then they start seeing news reports of a downed Qantas jet and they put two and two together but knew the jet was still flying.

So remember this when you're like "I'm not calling ATL Radio..." They're getting all the ECAMs and data, let the Airbus experts down there in MCC help.

But it flew on for 3 hours with the Captain on occasion stopping and asking the crew "should we just put her in the water now?" Not to be the next Swiss Air, but the crew thought they could do it.

They were leaking massive amounts of fuel by the way and only 3 of 11 fuel tanks were even working and one had a souvenir.



Fascinating stuff.

5 pilots by the way. 1 Captian, 1 FO, 1 FO/SO... and 2 LCA. And they butted heads at the outset over where the LCA would sit. Like whoa.

And when they landed, it was only after they massaged the numbers and finally got a number that made landing a possibility. As they slowed the airplane it started to buffet. Turns out the ailerons were failed and slipstreaming. So they found they couldn't get slower.

A320 Podcast

But it wasn't a bad design by Airbus. RR ate that one. Cost well over $100M to put the airplane back together and RR wrote a big check over it.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 06-25-2019, 03:55 PM
  #3646  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,958
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I never saw the 737-800 trim on its own during takeoff. Was never taught any mode where it would do that.
"Never taught" being the key phrase. We aren't taught much these days.

Here's the patent for the speed trim system if you really want detail. Autotrims a lot during initial climbout...

https://patents.google.com/patent/US4676460A/en
TED74 is offline  
Old 06-25-2019, 05:50 PM
  #3647  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,124
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I never saw the 737-800 trim on its own during takeoff. Was never taught any mode where it would do that.
That wheel is always moving around on climb out while hand flying without me touching anything!
m3113n1a1 is offline  
Old 06-25-2019, 10:36 PM
  #3648  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
That wheel is always moving around on climb out while hand flying without me touching anything!
I was thinking the same thing. I guess if you never hand fly after acceleration height you might not notice it, but it's a lot of movement. It was also discussed fairly in depth in training, at least to the point of knowing it exists.
Baradium is offline  
Old 06-26-2019, 05:37 AM
  #3649  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 278
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I never saw the 737-800 trim on its own during takeoff. Was never taught any mode where it would do that.
STS- Speed Trim System...

Speed trim is applied to the stabilizer automatically at low speed, low weight, aft C of G and high thrust. Sometimes you may notice that the speed trim is trimming in the opposite direction to you, this is because the speed trim is trying to trim the stabilizer in the direction calculated to provide the pilot with positive speed stability characteristics. The speed trim system adjusts stick force so the pilot must provide significant amount of pull force to reduce airspeed or a significant amount of push force to increase airspeed. Whereas, pilots are typically trying to trim the stick force to zero. Occasionally these may be in opposition.
FMGEC is offline  
Old 06-26-2019, 07:03 AM
  #3650  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,851
Default

Originally Posted by FMGEC
STS- Speed Trim System...

Speed trim is applied to the stabilizer automatically at low speed, low weight, aft C of G and high thrust. Sometimes you may notice that the speed trim is trimming in the opposite direction to you, this is because the speed trim is trying to trim the stabilizer in the direction calculated to provide the pilot with positive speed stability characteristics. The speed trim system adjusts stick force so the pilot must provide significant amount of pull force to reduce airspeed or a significant amount of push force to increase airspeed. Whereas, pilots are typically trying to trim the stick force to zero. Occasionally these may be in opposition.
Exactly. I feel forward pressure on climb-out starting around 700-800 feet. The trim-wheel is not turning. It uses HYD pressure with feedback through the control column.
GogglesPisano is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
acousticgrace
Regional
10
09-25-2014 10:37 AM
rmr1992
Cargo
24
09-11-2014 09:17 AM
Horhay
United
131
02-13-2013 10:58 PM
fartsarefunny
Foreign
6
06-14-2012 05:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices