Search

Notices

C Series Info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2019, 05:15 AM
  #3471  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 325
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq
The -300 will be an exceptional B73N-700 replacement
No, not really. The -700 is a specialized airplane here at DAL. They do the hot/high performance airports in Central America.
DELTAFO is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 05:46 AM
  #3472  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,131
Default

Originally Posted by DELTAFO
No, not really. The -700 is a specialized airplane here at DAL. They do the hot/high performance airports in Central America.
Yup....and SXM, SNA and EYW. All of which the A220-300 can do.
FL370esq is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 05:58 AM
  #3473  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 278
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq
We have 10 of the Boeing 737-700 NGs. I stand by my statement.
He was commenting on your label of “73N-700.”
The labeling is incorrect. There is a 737-700, but not a 73N-700.
One is an aircraft type. The other is a bastardized label of an airplane using a fragment of a Delta bid code.

Don’t even get me started on people’s labeling of a 767 as an “ER”
Ugh
FMGEC is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 08:27 AM
  #3474  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

Huh. Good thing the studebaker isnt still on property.
BobZ is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 01:26 PM
  #3475  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by FMGEC
He was commenting on your label of “73N-700.”
The labeling is incorrect. There is a 737-700, but not a 73N-700.
One is an aircraft type. The other is a bastardized label of an airplane using a fragment of a Delta bid code.

Don’t even get me started on people’s labeling of a 767 as an “ER”
Ugh
All of our 737-900s are ER models, I should just start referring to them as ERs in conversation
Baradium is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 02:01 PM
  #3476  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,220
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium
All of our 737-900s are ER models, I should just start referring to them as ERs in conversation
I love when people refer to the 400.
notEnuf is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 02:03 PM
  #3477  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
I can't see how that can be true vs the A321/757. Long narrow bodies beat everything, especially in the future with the A321neo, and the XLR if Delta gets those. The worst CASM is small RJ's and short Widebodies.
Short widebodies..... are we talking about planes or pilots?
full of luv is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 03:57 PM
  #3478  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Big E 757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: A320 Left seat
Posts: 2,585
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
Short widebodies..... are we talking about planes or pilots?
They both tend to be inefficient.
Big E 757 is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 05:57 PM
  #3479  
veut gagner ŕ la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

FWIW we need every aircraft we have.

737-700s and 319s are young.

Old A320 burns nearly the same amount of fuel per pax on lga-bos as a220, check icrew. Difference in 320 is owned and carries more seats for a given utilization of gates and similiar crew costs.

BBD is in serious trouble. Their rail division is a disaster. They want out of commercial aviation and have publically said that. They make Boeing look as well run as Apple. They're selling the wing factory in Belfast.

Engineers that you need to design a225 are gone.

Airbus would need to sink money into 225 and then from what I understand share profitability and pay bbd more in a few years... kind of kills profitability. Airbus already has a design if Boeing goes clean sheet 737 replacement and it's not A22X. Its evidently called A30X.

If the 221 and 223 are great as is, then the 2.5T pencil whip increase shows it should have been 2.5T lighter.

Just stuff I read from around the internet except the 319 part, which I know there is zero talk about parking them. If the 220s continue the slow trickle and 717s and 88s are exiting as rumored we need everything, especially to take advantage of AA and SWA max issues.

The 321neo FWIW you're looking at a jet that will remove 2L and 2R doors to allow for ideal and differing premium cabin arrangements for 197 pax in comparable configuration. The engine gets 20% better fuel efficiency then cfm powered 321 and 20% maintenance reduction and 50-80% noise reduction. It also jumps 2T in payload and 500nm range increase. LR model is more of everything except dimensions. The bummer is we didnt get in line for 320N for early 2020s.

Last edited by forgot to bid; 05-24-2019 at 06:28 PM.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 05-24-2019, 07:04 PM
  #3480  
veut gagner ŕ la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

But beyond the aesthetics of the plane the most beautiful aspect of the 221 is it replaces 76 seaters... on our side of the fence.
forgot to bid is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
acousticgrace
Regional
10
09-25-2014 10:37 AM
rmr1992
Cargo
24
09-11-2014 09:17 AM
Horhay
United
131
02-13-2013 10:58 PM
fartsarefunny
Foreign
6
06-14-2012 05:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices