C Series Info
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
#3472
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,131
#3473
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 278
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
He was commenting on your label of “73N-700.”
The labeling is incorrect. There is a 737-700, but not a 73N-700.
One is an aircraft type. The other is a bastardized label of an airplane using a fragment of a Delta bid code.
Don’t even get me started on people’s labeling of a 767 as an “ER”
Ugh
The labeling is incorrect. There is a 737-700, but not a 73N-700.
One is an aircraft type. The other is a bastardized label of an airplane using a fragment of a Delta bid code.
Don’t even get me started on people’s labeling of a 767 as an “ER”
Ugh
#3475
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
He was commenting on your label of “73N-700.”
The labeling is incorrect. There is a 737-700, but not a 73N-700.
One is an aircraft type. The other is a bastardized label of an airplane using a fragment of a Delta bid code.
Don’t even get me started on people’s labeling of a 767 as an “ER”
Ugh
The labeling is incorrect. There is a 737-700, but not a 73N-700.
One is an aircraft type. The other is a bastardized label of an airplane using a fragment of a Delta bid code.
Don’t even get me started on people’s labeling of a 767 as an “ER”
Ugh
#3477
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Short widebodies..... are we talking about planes or pilots?
#3479
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
FWIW we need every aircraft we have.
737-700s and 319s are young.
Old A320 burns nearly the same amount of fuel per pax on lga-bos as a220, check icrew. Difference in 320 is owned and carries more seats for a given utilization of gates and similiar crew costs.
BBD is in serious trouble. Their rail division is a disaster. They want out of commercial aviation and have publically said that. They make Boeing look as well run as Apple. They're selling the wing factory in Belfast.
Engineers that you need to design a225 are gone.
Airbus would need to sink money into 225 and then from what I understand share profitability and pay bbd more in a few years... kind of kills profitability. Airbus already has a design if Boeing goes clean sheet 737 replacement and it's not A22X. Its evidently called A30X.
If the 221 and 223 are great as is, then the 2.5T pencil whip increase shows it should have been 2.5T lighter.
Just stuff I read from around the internet except the 319 part, which I know there is zero talk about parking them. If the 220s continue the slow trickle and 717s and 88s are exiting as rumored we need everything, especially to take advantage of AA and SWA max issues.
The 321neo FWIW you're looking at a jet that will remove 2L and 2R doors to allow for ideal and differing premium cabin arrangements for 197 pax in comparable configuration. The engine gets 20% better fuel efficiency then cfm powered 321 and 20% maintenance reduction and 50-80% noise reduction. It also jumps 2T in payload and 500nm range increase. LR model is more of everything except dimensions. The bummer is we didnt get in line for 320N for early 2020s.
737-700s and 319s are young.
Old A320 burns nearly the same amount of fuel per pax on lga-bos as a220, check icrew. Difference in 320 is owned and carries more seats for a given utilization of gates and similiar crew costs.
BBD is in serious trouble. Their rail division is a disaster. They want out of commercial aviation and have publically said that. They make Boeing look as well run as Apple. They're selling the wing factory in Belfast.
Engineers that you need to design a225 are gone.
Airbus would need to sink money into 225 and then from what I understand share profitability and pay bbd more in a few years... kind of kills profitability. Airbus already has a design if Boeing goes clean sheet 737 replacement and it's not A22X. Its evidently called A30X.
If the 221 and 223 are great as is, then the 2.5T pencil whip increase shows it should have been 2.5T lighter.
Just stuff I read from around the internet except the 319 part, which I know there is zero talk about parking them. If the 220s continue the slow trickle and 717s and 88s are exiting as rumored we need everything, especially to take advantage of AA and SWA max issues.
The 321neo FWIW you're looking at a jet that will remove 2L and 2R doors to allow for ideal and differing premium cabin arrangements for 197 pax in comparable configuration. The engine gets 20% better fuel efficiency then cfm powered 321 and 20% maintenance reduction and 50-80% noise reduction. It also jumps 2T in payload and 500nm range increase. LR model is more of everything except dimensions. The bummer is we didnt get in line for 320N for early 2020s.
Last edited by forgot to bid; 05-24-2019 at 06:28 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post