Search

Notices

C Series Info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2018, 01:19 PM
  #2391  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 1,218
Default

Originally Posted by David Puddy
Boeing needs Delta for the 797 as well. There are many skeptics on Wall Street regarding the business case for the 797. If Delta signaled it would order 100+ copies, Wall Street will feel better. Delta has better credit quality than Norwegian or some of the other airlines claiming interest in the 797 too. It’s a win-win for both Boeing and Delta.
100 797’s?? Never gonna happen. If Boeing actually builds them (big if, more likely they build a 737-11 before we see a 797) and if we order them .......I bet it’s no more than 30 with options for another 30.
Xray678 is offline  
Old 02-20-2018, 02:59 PM
  #2392  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium
The last time it was mentioned (response to a direct question), the answer was that even with the lower oil prices it is reducing our crack spread (the upcharge we pay for refined fuel over what the base oil costs the refinery). I think the statement was that it's more efficient at high oil prices, but is still saving us money.

With the amount of fuel we consume, if it is really reducing our fuel costs (after expenses), even if it's 1 cent a gallon or less, it could still be resulting in significant savings.
I think I read that our purchase saves all the airlines money because it reduces the crack spread. But. Had we not done it nobody would have done it.

And it makes money. So it's good so far. But time will tell. At least it's better than fuel hedging.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 02-20-2018, 04:14 PM
  #2393  
Gets Weekends Off
 
qball's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Posts: 1,410
Default

It came at a bargain price.
qball is offline  
Old 02-20-2018, 04:19 PM
  #2394  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

I would guess now delta can dump a ton into it and expense it in the same year.
BobZ is offline  
Old 02-20-2018, 05:02 PM
  #2395  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: CS100
Posts: 96
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
100 797’s?? Never gonna happen. If Boeing actually builds them (big if, more likely they build a 737-11 before we see a 797) and if we order them .......I bet it’s no more than 30 with options for another 30.
No 737-11 - Boeing's short landing gear has finally caught up with them. Go back to 1965 when Douglas built the "Super 60's DC-8's" - Delta was the launch customer - the 707 couldn't be stretched because of its short landing gear. Boeing was doomed to repeat itself on the 737. Ed Wells was the 707 designer and wished he hadn't made the gear so short that it couldn't be stretched...(it was short for weight savings). The DC-8 had longer gear and a wider fuselage. 6 abreast on a -8 was comfortable.

Who would have dreamed that the 1965 737-100/200, over three years, from 1970 through 1972, only delivered 88 aircraft – roughly equivalent to seven weeks of production at today’s rate (57 A/C PER MONTH). Boeing was delivering every 707-320 and 727-200 they could make - they considered cancelling the 737!

So let me understand this...we have 80 or so 767's and 100+ 757s (200's and 300's). But we are only going to buy 60 797's to replace them?

I'm not so sure. If we are buying 130 737-900s and 200+ A321's (CEO's and NEO's) to replace 165 MD-88/90's and early A-319/320's, and CS-100/300's to allow 76 seat RJs to replace 50 seat RJs, what is going to replace the 767's and 757's...I'm not sure how only 30 797's fits.
747Flyer is offline  
Old 02-20-2018, 06:57 PM
  #2396  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 1,218
Default

Originally Posted by 747Flyer
So let me understand this...we have 80 or so 767's and 100+ 757s (200's and 300's). But we are only going to buy 60 797's to replace them?

I'm not so sure. If we are buying 130 737-900s and 200+ A321's (CEO's and NEO's) to replace 165 MD-88/90's and early A-319/320's, and CS-100/300's to allow 76 seat RJs to replace 50 seat RJs, what is going to replace the 767's and 757's...I'm not sure how only 30 797's fits.
I was kidding about a 737-11, though I was kidding years ago when I suggested they would build a 737-1000.

We have orders for 100 321NEOs, with options for another 100. I predict many of the options will be taken up and eventually converted to the LR version, which pretty much covers 98% of what a 757 can do. Also we have 25 330 NEOs on order to replace early 767s, and I think we will end up buying more. The Network folks seem pretty high on the 330 NEO, and from what I have read, the data from flight test is showing inline with predictions if not a little better. Further, I predict we will at some point order the 787. Huge numbers...no. But I think we will order some (787-9 or 10 replace the 777)

Might we end up with more 797s? Maybe. But I stand by my prediction......for an initial order we will not go more than 30 with the same number of options. Which gives us the option of up to 60 aircraft. You really think it will go higher than that??

Will be interesting to revisit this in a couple of years, but I think I will be pretty close.
Xray678 is offline  
Old 02-21-2018, 03:25 AM
  #2397  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by 747Flyer
I'm not so sure. If we are buying 130 737-900s and 200+ A321's (CEO's and NEO's) to replace 165 MD-88/90's and early A-319/320's, and CS-100/300's to allow 76 seat RJs to replace 50 seat RJs, what is going to replace the 767's and 757's...I'm not sure how only 30 797's fits.
I think there has been a lot of double speak about what airplanes are being bought to replace going back to the original 739 order that it's not worth analyzing.

After all, if the 321 is to suddenly be for 88 replacement then why is it doing 757 routes from ATL to LAX/SAN/SFO/LAS/PHX and all the MCO and FLL type flying. And if the CS100 is for 76 a seat replacement why is it initially replacing 717s that are not exiting the fleet for 2 decades or so?

I think they have a plan to upgauge and there is stuff that goes according to plan, stuff they make mistakes on but will never admit it and stuff they get lucky on. I think it's just going to be different then what we know.

As to the CS300, I don't see that happening if we are trying to buy 797s.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 02-21-2018, 03:35 AM
  #2398  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,418
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
I think there has been a lot of double speak about what airplanes are being bought to replace going back to the original 739 order that it's not worth analyzing.

After all, if the 321 is to suddenly be for 88 replacement then why is it doing 757 routes from ATL to LAX/SAN/SFO/LAS/PHX and all the MCO and FLL type flying. And if the CS100 is for 76 a seat replacement why is it initially replacing 717s that are not exiting the fleet for 2 decades or so?

I think they have a plan to upgauge and there is stuff that goes according to plan, stuff they make mistakes on but will never admit it and stuff they get lucky on. I think it's just going to be different then what we know.

As to the CS300, I don't see that happening if we are trying to buy 797s.
The A321 is doing plenty of ex MD routes. It soon will own the N/S stuff from FL. The CS300 and 797 are totally different sized airframes. I doubt the decision to purchase one influences the purchase of the other.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 02-21-2018, 04:33 AM
  #2399  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The A321 is doing plenty of ex MD routes. It soon will own the N/S stuff from FL. The CS300 and 797 are totally different sized airframes. I doubt the decision to purchase one influences the purchase of the other.
It's doing MD routes that the 757 also did if that's what you mean. You may or may not know there is a good bit of crossover on the domestic side on shorter routes.

But I never flew the 88 from ATL to SAN.

As to the CS300 and 797, if DAL wants to be the first 797 customer i doubt Boeing would make that happen if at the same time they're poking Boeing in the eye with a stick. After all F18s and CS100s are not the same size and you see how that worked out in Canada.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 02-21-2018, 07:16 AM
  #2400  
Gets Weekends Off
 
qball's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Posts: 1,410
Default

Originally Posted by 747Flyer
No 737-11 - Boeing's short landing gear has finally caught up with them. Go back to 1965 when Douglas built the "Super 60's DC-8's" - Delta was the launch customer - the 707 couldn't be stretched because of its short landing gear. Boeing was doomed to repeat itself on the 737. Ed Wells was the 707 designer and wished he hadn't made the gear so short that it couldn't be stretched...(it was short for weight savings). The DC-8 had longer gear and a wider fuselage. 6 abreast on a -8 was comfortable.

Who would have dreamed that the 1965 737-100/200, over three years, from 1970 through 1972, only delivered 88 aircraft – roughly equivalent to seven weeks of production at today’s rate (57 A/C PER MONTH). Boeing was delivering every 707-320 and 727-200 they could make - they considered cancelling the 737!

So let me understand this...we have 80 or so 767's and 100+ 757s (200's and 300's). But we are only going to buy 60 797's to replace them?

I'm not so sure. If we are buying 130 737-900s and 200+ A321's (CEO's and NEO's) to replace 165 MD-88/90's and early A-319/320's, and CS-100/300's to allow 76 seat RJs to replace 50 seat RJs, what is going to replace the 767's and 757's...I'm not sure how only 30 797's fits.
Early slow sales of the 737 might have had much to do with the 3 man crew controversy that went on for some time.
qball is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
acousticgrace
Regional
10
09-25-2014 10:37 AM
rmr1992
Cargo
24
09-11-2014 09:17 AM
Horhay
United
131
02-13-2013 10:58 PM
fartsarefunny
Foreign
6
06-14-2012 05:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices