Search

Notices

C Series Info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-31-2018, 01:21 PM
  #2191  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
See for yourself! It's one of the # limitation items for takeoff. I was thinking the same thing... crosswind limits are actually quite low for takeoff overall with 20 knots stead and up to 26 with gusts below 4000.
So it won't be based in LGA?
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 01-31-2018, 01:41 PM
  #2192  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Ship741
Reference the cabins, I hear almost daily about the importance of customer service and net promoter scores. As a long time employee, its ironic to see that everything we were taking out of the customer service experience from 1995-2010, we are now putting back in. NPS are in fact coming up as a result. And of course, some mid-level managers who think they're being original get their bonuses every year on the basis of those improved NPS. As someone said earlier, those folks are brilliant....Deja vu, non?
That's how you do flight attendant Union management... Take away, give back, claim benevolence, repeat.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 01-31-2018, 04:19 PM
  #2193  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
That's how you do flight attendant Union management... Take away, give back, claim benevolence, repeat.
That means all we have to do is look at the highest crosswind limits any manufacturer offers and say "ME TOO!" and we'll get it.
gloopy is offline  
Old 01-31-2018, 04:34 PM
  #2194  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 113
Default

Originally Posted by skidmark
???????????? Me no speak
he just wrote a super long version of "i see what you did there."
ceelo is offline  
Old 01-31-2018, 04:35 PM
  #2195  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
That means all we have to do is look at the highest crosswind limits any manufacturer offers and say "ME TOO!" and we'll get it.
Someone probably heard that the pilots would like the crosswind limit to be 40 kts and they said BS, not doing it. The pilots don't need that.

Hey bbd, we don't want the extra crosswind allowance, give us the minimum. Oh it's all standard? No. We want it to be less. Can we pay to have it reduced? Yes? Great, thanks. I mean mucho gracias.

Take that pilots!

forgot to bid is offline  
Old 01-31-2018, 06:02 PM
  #2196  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: CS100
Posts: 96
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
I was just looking at the Vol 1 last night... max crosswind of 5 knots for takeoff above 4000 feet???

Surely that can be fixed?
Pulease...do you really think ANYONE would buy an aircraft with that limit without an alternate procedure?

If you would have read further, you would have seen the limit of 30 Kts xwind for a "restricted takeoff": Vol 1 SP 7.4:

Restricted Takeoff Procedure
Note: A restricted takeoffs is required when the normal takeoff wind
limitations are exceeded.

A restricted takeoff is the same as a normal takeoff except:
• After allowing the engines to stabilize at 50% N1:
• Observe a minimum of GS 20 under the PFD speed tape
prior to advancing thrust levers through 60% N1.

This is our normal takeoff procedure...

Edit - Apologies CLAMP - I see Planetrain already answered this...
747Flyer is offline  
Old 01-31-2018, 06:03 PM
  #2197  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: CS100
Posts: 96
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Wow if that's true, its flat out comical. Makes it pathetically unusable at DEN and SLC as well as several other small airports. Is that a hard TO/LDG limitation regardless, just auto land or what?
Gloopy - your statement falls under the category of: "A little knowledge is dangerous- LOL".

see my reply to CLAMP above...

Last edited by 747Flyer; 01-31-2018 at 06:13 PM.
747Flyer is offline  
Old 01-31-2018, 06:05 PM
  #2198  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: CS100
Posts: 96
Default

Originally Posted by dodgerk
Anybody know what the final ruling from the ITC is all about on Feb 9th that is mentioned in the flight ops update?
That is their written decision in full "leagalese"...
747Flyer is offline  
Old 01-31-2018, 06:55 PM
  #2199  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default



I did done do some learnin' today.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 01-31-2018, 07:19 PM
  #2200  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by 747Flyer
Gloopy - your statement falls under the category of: "A little knowledge is dangerous- LOL".

see my reply to CLAMP above...
Which is why I said "if that's true"...
gloopy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
acousticgrace
Regional
10
09-25-2014 10:37 AM
rmr1992
Cargo
24
09-11-2014 09:17 AM
Horhay
United
131
02-13-2013 10:58 PM
fartsarefunny
Foreign
6
06-14-2012 05:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices