C Series Info
#1761
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,094
I really do think if my neighbors actually had a choice in airframes they'd pick a C series (or anything with an entertainment system).
I don't think that is Delta's intent though.
Beyond that small caveat, I agree on cabin class and flight times.
#1762
Actually I think he was just throwing some ice-water reality into our message board perspective. Bottom line is, though we (correctly) lament Boeing making increasingly absurd derivations of an old, tired design, even though the 737 is narrower than the bus, the C series has big windows, etc etc., the vast majority of pax will not buy a ticket here versus there just based on aircraft type.
I did not say that NO passenger would do that--but likely not enough to influence corporate decisions regarding purchasing aircraft.
I keep thinking of a chuckle I had once a long time ago. I saw a Virgin Atlantic A340 with the following painted on the side: "4 engines 4 over water."
As if ANY passenger really cared about the philosophies of overwater flying, ETOPS versus non-ETOPS equipment, etc. What was the point? I'm guessing that somewhere someone at VA thought that if they highlighted their "4-engine 4 overwater" fleet that that might make a difference in the bottom line.
I did not say that NO passenger would do that--but likely not enough to influence corporate decisions regarding purchasing aircraft.
I keep thinking of a chuckle I had once a long time ago. I saw a Virgin Atlantic A340 with the following painted on the side: "4 engines 4 over water."
As if ANY passenger really cared about the philosophies of overwater flying, ETOPS versus non-ETOPS equipment, etc. What was the point? I'm guessing that somewhere someone at VA thought that if they highlighted their "4-engine 4 overwater" fleet that that might make a difference in the bottom line.
#1763
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
I actually agree with your first paragraph here... that's just not all you said above.
As for me, I made zero predictions, never mentioned HVCs, and never even said if I think C series is awesome or if it sucks.
Scroll up and take a look. And maybe cut back a coffee or two?
As for me, I made zero predictions, never mentioned HVCs, and never even said if I think C series is awesome or if it sucks.
Scroll up and take a look. And maybe cut back a coffee or two?
While that happens to some degree, such as the novelty factor of people trying to fly the 380 just because its new and the biggest or whatever, to trying to fly a 747 because it'll be gone soon, as well as because of cabin differences is very, very minimal. So tiny that its not a factor beyond the sales brochures and MBA white paper level.
You asked if I knew or talked to HVC's and I have. I know several personally but to be fair I'd say we all do, as well as say no one knows enough to provide more than an anecdotal implication. But I think when you take a fair look around the industry you'll see that there just isn't massive customer migration, even among the HVC subset, because of equipment.
I think the highest we've ever seen that relatively rare phenomenon was when the RJ was new and replacing not only turboprops in general but really crappy ones in particular. Yet even then there were large networks of full turboprops for quite a while. Now you see that to a lesser but still significant amount avoiding the super cramped 50 seaters. Anything beyond that like I said may happen from time to time, but just isn't prevalent enough to matter in equipment selection.
DL still has plenty of Porsches picking up HVC's who arrived on an MD88, which is incredibly easy to avoid these days. SWA is doing very well too, and carrying more business pax than they used to. My point is that kind of product selection simply isn't a significant factor. The C Series cabin probably is better, but its not game changing orders of magnitude better to the point we'd lose any significant amount of customers to another airline because of it. To assume otherwise you'd have to come up wth some very specialized scenarios, like one airline puts CRJ-200 50 seaters on an hourly shuttle route while another company uses the C Series on the same routes with the same frequency at similar prices. OK in that case that probably would happen enough to move the needle.
But the C Series vs a 320...or even a cabin inferior 737/717/MD90/etc just isn't going to shift enough customers to drive a fleet decision. That's all I'm saying.
#1765
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Posts: 1,410
If DAL (or any other air line) was worried about losing a significant amount of HVCs due to cabin comfort , there wouldn't be a single 50 seater left flying. Yet, on many city pairs, that is all they offer for a significant portion of the year.
#1766
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: Left
Posts: 1,824
This would suck:
https://www.reuters.com/article/boeing-bombardier-aeromexico/aeromexico-eyes-deltas-cseries-jet-order-amid-u-s-trade-spat-sources-idUSL1N1O41Y3
Obviously a ruling in favor of Bombardier in February (financial pain not proven by Boeing despite zero 100-120 seat option) would help avoid this.... Not the entire order - just a piece if Boeing wins in February.
https://www.reuters.com/article/boeing-bombardier-aeromexico/aeromexico-eyes-deltas-cseries-jet-order-amid-u-s-trade-spat-sources-idUSL1N1O41Y3
Obviously a ruling in favor of Bombardier in February (financial pain not proven by Boeing despite zero 100-120 seat option) would help avoid this.... Not the entire order - just a piece if Boeing wins in February.
#1767
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
This would suck:
https://www.reuters.com/article/boei...-idUSL1N1O41Y3
Obviously a ruling in favor of Bombardier in February (financial pain not proven by Boeing despite zero 100-120 seat option) would help avoid this.... Not the entire order - just a piece if Boeing wins in February.
https://www.reuters.com/article/boei...-idUSL1N1O41Y3
Obviously a ruling in favor of Bombardier in February (financial pain not proven by Boeing despite zero 100-120 seat option) would help avoid this.... Not the entire order - just a piece if Boeing wins in February.
#1768
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Eh, I think you might both have a point. I live in ATL, in a neighborhood full of business travelers. The reality is if you're an east coast road warrior based in ATL, your airline "choice" is DL. No one else has a network here that comes remotely close. And with a travel radius of 800-1000 miles, your "choice" is pretty much 88s.
I really do think if my neighbors actually had a choice in airframes they'd pick a C series (or anything with an entertainment system).
I don't think that is Delta's intent though.
Beyond that small caveat, I agree on cabin class and flight times.
I really do think if my neighbors actually had a choice in airframes they'd pick a C series (or anything with an entertainment system).
I don't think that is Delta's intent though.
Beyond that small caveat, I agree on cabin class and flight times.
#1769
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,552
So Boeing is gonna lose the 5.6 billion dollar Canadian fighter order.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/boeing-...ada-1512767566
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://www.wsj.com/articles/boeing-...ada-1512767566
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#1770
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,163
So Boeing is gonna lose the 5.6 billion dollar Canadian fighter order.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/boeing-...ada-1512767566
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://www.wsj.com/articles/boeing-...ada-1512767566
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post