Search

Notices

C Series Info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2017, 02:40 AM
  #1761  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,094
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Please. I know and have talked to plenty. The VAST majority don't. I think 1 in 10,000 is actually probably VERY high. Price, cabin class (first vs coach, etc) and flight times are a million times more important.
Eh, I think you might both have a point. I live in ATL, in a neighborhood full of business travelers. The reality is if you're an east coast road warrior based in ATL, your airline "choice" is DL. No one else has a network here that comes remotely close. And with a travel radius of 800-1000 miles, your "choice" is pretty much 88s.

I really do think if my neighbors actually had a choice in airframes they'd pick a C series (or anything with an entertainment system).

I don't think that is Delta's intent though.

Beyond that small caveat, I agree on cabin class and flight times.
Sputnik is offline  
Old 11-28-2017, 09:46 AM
  #1762  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
Actually I think he was just throwing some ice-water reality into our message board perspective. Bottom line is, though we (correctly) lament Boeing making increasingly absurd derivations of an old, tired design, even though the 737 is narrower than the bus, the C series has big windows, etc etc., the vast majority of pax will not buy a ticket here versus there just based on aircraft type.

I did not say that NO passenger would do that--but likely not enough to influence corporate decisions regarding purchasing aircraft.

I keep thinking of a chuckle I had once a long time ago. I saw a Virgin Atlantic A340 with the following painted on the side: "4 engines 4 over water."

As if ANY passenger really cared about the philosophies of overwater flying, ETOPS versus non-ETOPS equipment, etc. What was the point? I'm guessing that somewhere someone at VA thought that if they highlighted their "4-engine 4 overwater" fleet that that might make a difference in the bottom line.
The better A346 paint job by Virgin was "mine is longer than yours"
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 11-28-2017, 10:09 AM
  #1763  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
I actually agree with your first paragraph here... that's just not all you said above.

As for me, I made zero predictions, never mentioned HVCs, and never even said if I think C series is awesome or if it sucks.

Scroll up and take a look. And maybe cut back a coffee or two?
As far as I can tell, the entire point(s) of contention among us exclusively revolve around the extent to which DL (or any airline for that matter) will gain or lose HVC's because HVC's are spring loaded to change airlines to chase equipment.

While that happens to some degree, such as the novelty factor of people trying to fly the 380 just because its new and the biggest or whatever, to trying to fly a 747 because it'll be gone soon, as well as because of cabin differences is very, very minimal. So tiny that its not a factor beyond the sales brochures and MBA white paper level.

You asked if I knew or talked to HVC's and I have. I know several personally but to be fair I'd say we all do, as well as say no one knows enough to provide more than an anecdotal implication. But I think when you take a fair look around the industry you'll see that there just isn't massive customer migration, even among the HVC subset, because of equipment.

I think the highest we've ever seen that relatively rare phenomenon was when the RJ was new and replacing not only turboprops in general but really crappy ones in particular. Yet even then there were large networks of full turboprops for quite a while. Now you see that to a lesser but still significant amount avoiding the super cramped 50 seaters. Anything beyond that like I said may happen from time to time, but just isn't prevalent enough to matter in equipment selection.

DL still has plenty of Porsches picking up HVC's who arrived on an MD88, which is incredibly easy to avoid these days. SWA is doing very well too, and carrying more business pax than they used to. My point is that kind of product selection simply isn't a significant factor. The C Series cabin probably is better, but its not game changing orders of magnitude better to the point we'd lose any significant amount of customers to another airline because of it. To assume otherwise you'd have to come up wth some very specialized scenarios, like one airline puts CRJ-200 50 seaters on an hourly shuttle route while another company uses the C Series on the same routes with the same frequency at similar prices. OK in that case that probably would happen enough to move the needle.

But the C Series vs a 320...or even a cabin inferior 737/717/MD90/etc just isn't going to shift enough customers to drive a fleet decision. That's all I'm saying.
gloopy is offline  
Old 11-28-2017, 11:00 AM
  #1764  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

737 inferior cabin?!

Whchya talkin bout Willis??
BobZ is offline  
Old 11-28-2017, 11:13 AM
  #1765  
Gets Weekends Off
 
qball's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Posts: 1,410
Default

If DAL (or any other air line) was worried about losing a significant amount of HVCs due to cabin comfort , there wouldn't be a single 50 seater left flying. Yet, on many city pairs, that is all they offer for a significant portion of the year.
qball is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 03:45 PM
  #1766  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: Left
Posts: 1,824
Default

This would suck:

https://www.reuters.com/article/boeing-bombardier-aeromexico/aeromexico-eyes-deltas-cseries-jet-order-amid-u-s-trade-spat-sources-idUSL1N1O41Y3

Obviously a ruling in favor of Bombardier in February (financial pain not proven by Boeing despite zero 100-120 seat option) would help avoid this.... Not the entire order - just a piece if Boeing wins in February.
David Puddy is offline  
Old 12-04-2017, 07:49 PM
  #1767  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by David Puddy
This would suck:

https://www.reuters.com/article/boei...-idUSL1N1O41Y3

Obviously a ruling in favor of Bombardier in February (financial pain not proven by Boeing despite zero 100-120 seat option) would help avoid this.... Not the entire order - just a piece if Boeing wins in February.
Delta runs Aeromexico, so not a surprise really.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 12-05-2017, 02:58 AM
  #1768  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik
Eh, I think you might both have a point. I live in ATL, in a neighborhood full of business travelers. The reality is if you're an east coast road warrior based in ATL, your airline "choice" is DL. No one else has a network here that comes remotely close. And with a travel radius of 800-1000 miles, your "choice" is pretty much 88s.

I really do think if my neighbors actually had a choice in airframes they'd pick a C series (or anything with an entertainment system).

I don't think that is Delta's intent though.

Beyond that small caveat, I agree on cabin class and flight times.
I would go read the flyertalk forum in the Delta section. They may not be representive of the majority of our customers but the pay careful attention to equipment and seat selection.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 12-08-2017, 01:21 PM
  #1769  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,552
Default

So Boeing is gonna lose the 5.6 billion dollar Canadian fighter order.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/boeing-...ada-1512767566


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RiddleEagle18 is offline  
Old 12-08-2017, 01:54 PM
  #1770  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,163
Default

Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
So Boeing is gonna lose the 5.6 billion dollar Canadian fighter order.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/boeing-...ada-1512767566


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don’t bring a knife to a gun fight. Painful lesson.
waldo135 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
acousticgrace
Regional
10
09-25-2014 10:37 AM
rmr1992
Cargo
24
09-11-2014 09:17 AM
Horhay
United
131
02-13-2013 10:58 PM
fartsarefunny
Foreign
6
06-14-2012 05:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices