C Series Info
11-19-2017, 01:16 PM
#1711
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,745
It's manual entry unfortunately, not automatic sync, yet. You load your aircraft profile, add in the weights/fuel, and as you change route, altitudes, etc, it automatically updates performance/W&B, with providing warnings.
https://www.foreflight.com/products/performance-plus/
https://www.foreflight.com/products/performance-plus/
11-19-2017, 03:13 PM
#1712
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
11-21-2017, 10:45 AM
#1717
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: CS100
Posts: 96
Korean's first aircraft was due to be delivered in Sept, but they wanted two spare engines with it. It will now be delivered in Dec. They were scheduled for four this year, but will likely only get the one...
11-23-2017, 01:02 AM
#1718
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
I would like DAL to get the Cs ASAP.
I just needed a flight to get home from IAH. I was planning to fly on DAL, then found out they had a CRJ IAH-MSP. AA, my second choice, also had an RJ IAH-ORD. I flew on UAL because they had a 737-900 IAH-ORD. It is somewhat better than the ERJ-145/CRJs. I did notice that it did not have power receptacles, like the AA 737-900s have, and the TV seatback screen was pay per view. I do NOT like flying UAL at all!
I would STRONGLY prefer the Bombadier C, or the E-170/195 family.
I just needed a flight to get home from IAH. I was planning to fly on DAL, then found out they had a CRJ IAH-MSP. AA, my second choice, also had an RJ IAH-ORD. I flew on UAL because they had a 737-900 IAH-ORD. It is somewhat better than the ERJ-145/CRJs. I did notice that it did not have power receptacles, like the AA 737-900s have, and the TV seatback screen was pay per view. I do NOT like flying UAL at all!
I would STRONGLY prefer the Bombadier C, or the E-170/195 family.
11-23-2017, 05:37 AM
#1719
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: Left
Posts: 1,824
I would like DAL to get the Cs ASAP.
I just needed a flight to get home from IAH. I was planning to fly on DAL, then found out they had a CRJ IAH-MSP. AA, my second choice, also had an RJ IAH-ORD. I flew on UAL because they had a 737-900 IAH-ORD. It is somewhat better than the ERJ-145/CRJs. I did notice that it did not have power receptacles, like the AA 737-900s have, and the TV seatback screen was pay per view. I do NOT like flying UAL at all!
I would STRONGLY prefer the Bombadier C, or the E-170/195 family.
I just needed a flight to get home from IAH. I was planning to fly on DAL, then found out they had a CRJ IAH-MSP. AA, my second choice, also had an RJ IAH-ORD. I flew on UAL because they had a 737-900 IAH-ORD. It is somewhat better than the ERJ-145/CRJs. I did notice that it did not have power receptacles, like the AA 737-900s have, and the TV seatback screen was pay per view. I do NOT like flying UAL at all!
I would STRONGLY prefer the Bombadier C, or the E-170/195 family.
In the near term, Pratt & Whitney needs to get its act together and catch up with GTF engine production.
Cliff - with all of your worldwide travel, have you flown on the SWISS CS100/300 or Air Baltic CS300 yet?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
