From the day late dollar short file…
05-15-2024, 01:41 PM
#1
Perennial Reserve
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,200
From the day late dollar short file…
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcar...leak-theories/
excerpts:
HHS looks to debar group at center of COVID lab-leak theories
BY JOSEPH CHOI - 05/15/24 4:35 PM ET
“A thorough investigation determined that there is adequate evidence that EHA has not been compliant with federal regulations and grant terms and conditions, which affects EHA’s present responsibility,” and HHS spokesperson said in a statement to The Hill.
“As a grantee administrator, EHA’s role is to provide oversight of the activities of its subawardees, including reporting requirements back to the National Institutes of Health (and other federal government agencies), to ensure compliance with all grant terms and conditions and federal regulations. The record establishes EHA did not fulfill these responsibilities,” they added.
The basis for pursuing debarment appeared to be conflict between the National Institutes of Health (NIH), EHA and the difficulty that NIH had in acquiring documents and records from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), to whom the EHA had awarded federal funding to for studying chimeric viruses.
Critics, including members of the COVID select subcommittee, have questioned whether the WIV’s research may have led to a lab-leak that caused the global pandemic. EHA has long maintained that the research conducted at WIV could not have led to a lab-leak resulting in the pandemic.
As was noted in the NIH letter, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases had previously determined that the research conducted at WIV was not subject to the U.S.’s ban on funding gain-of-function research, which genetically alters pathogens to predict potential mutations that could lead to outbreak in the future.
In her letter, Brisbon recorded instances throughout the pandemic where EHA’s assertions regarding WIV’s research did not align with NIH experts and other points in which the nonprofit failed to provide records requested by NIH.
“As a grantee administrator, EHA’s role is to provide oversight of the activities of its subawardees, including reporting requirements back to the National Institutes of Health (and other federal government agencies), to ensure compliance with all grant terms and conditions and federal regulations. The record establishes EHA did not fulfill these responsibilities,” they added.
The basis for pursuing debarment appeared to be conflict between the National Institutes of Health (NIH), EHA and the difficulty that NIH had in acquiring documents and records from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), to whom the EHA had awarded federal funding to for studying chimeric viruses.
Critics, including members of the COVID select subcommittee, have questioned whether the WIV’s research may have led to a lab-leak that caused the global pandemic. EHA has long maintained that the research conducted at WIV could not have led to a lab-leak resulting in the pandemic.
As was noted in the NIH letter, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases had previously determined that the research conducted at WIV was not subject to the U.S.’s ban on funding gain-of-function research, which genetically alters pathogens to predict potential mutations that could lead to outbreak in the future.
In her letter, Brisbon recorded instances throughout the pandemic where EHA’s assertions regarding WIV’s research did not align with NIH experts and other points in which the nonprofit failed to provide records requested by NIH.
The decision to proceed with debarment is effective as of May 15. It comes just one day before Lawrence Tabak, principal deputy director of NIH, is set to testifybefore the select subcommittee on “discrepancies” between what NIH officials have previously said and what EHA’s Daszak recently said in his testimony to the panel.
After news of NIH’s decision broke on Wednesday, a spokesperson for EHA said in statement to The Hill, “EcoHealth Alliance is disappointed by HHS’ decision today and we will be contesting the proposed debarment. We disagree strongly with the decision and will present evidence to refute each of these allegations and to show that NIH’s continued support of EcoHealth Alliance is in the public interest.”
COVID select subcommittee Ranking Member Raul Ruiz (D-Calif.), applauded HHS’s decision, marking a rare moment of bipartisan agreement from the committee in which Democrats have routinely accused GOP colleagues of overzealously investigating the lab-leak theory.
COVID select subcommittee Ranking Member Raul Ruiz (D-Calif.), applauded HHS’s decision, marking a rare moment of bipartisan agreement from the committee in which Democrats have routinely accused GOP colleagues of overzealously investigating the lab-leak theory.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
