Mikeey69

Say boner

[

QUOTE=Knobcrk1;3220558]😂 Let me put it in a way that’s less diplomatic.

575,000 people have died from the virus the last 12 months. Typical influenza deaths

per year in the US, 12,000 to 61,000. That’s just deaths. And all these numbers are only because we all did what we did. What the real death numbers would have been had we not followed mandates? only fauci knows(sarcasm)[/QUOTE]

Knobcrk1

You should probably check the numbers again. Definitely not as good if not better than anywhere else. They’re in top tier for states that did worse, at least deaths per million.

RiddleEagle18

Yay would you just look at all those southern states at the top of the list in deaths per million!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

RiddleEagle18

By the way. Florida and California essentially exactly the same in deaths per million. But but but Deathsantis.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

AntiPeter

https://assets.researchsquare.com/fi...v1_stamped.pdf

In France, mask mandates had no effect or an inverse effect on COVID hospitalizations.

simuflite

While I sympathize with the post above, the paper is not yet peer-reviewed and the authors explicitly state it was an academic exercise.

spirited

Translation "It will be pulled in the public interest" soon

AntiPeter

Peer review is important and it is reasonable to be skeptical of all scientific research.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...4/pdf/main.pdf
Here is some peer review that is critical about facemasks. Not sure how slipped past the ideologues.

Regularguy

Since the paper is probably too long for most US Citizens to read, here's the conclusion. Yes is is based on science and data!

These are not conspiracy nut, snopes or crackpots.

Our mission

Elsevier helps researchers and healthcare professionals advance science and improve health outcomes for the benefit of society.

We do this by facilitating insights and critical decision-making for customers across the global research and health ecosystems. Learn more
About Elsevier

"The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of
wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data
suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to
block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks.
Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse
physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of
fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression,
fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for
viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression.
Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature
death. Governments, policy makers and health organizations should
utilize prosper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to
wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health. "

main.pdf (nih.gov)

JamesNoBrakes

It's funny to see this title keep popping up when I went to Texas 2 weeks after it was posted and the municipality restrictions were still in place, businesses were not "open to 100%".