Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
Fox News:  surge in new cases >

Fox News: surge in new cases

Search

Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

Fox News: surge in new cases

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2020, 09:32 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 125
Default

Originally Posted by Knobcrk1
Looking at the graph the case numbers would have to be a bit higher for deaths to be rising. The cases have been on a steady rise the last few weeks. Let’s hope the deaths do stay lower though. The predictions are up to 400k dead by January.
Where are you getting that ridiculous number from? There are roughly 218k dead currently. 75 days between now and January. In order to get to 400k there would have to be 2400 a day due between today and then. That would be almost double what the daily average was during the summer peak. I think you need to do a little research and use some deductive reasoning before you post wild claims like that.
KSUto64 is offline  
Old 10-18-2020, 09:35 AM
  #82  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,564
Default

The "400k dead by the end of the year" came from an update to the IHME model over a month ago.

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcar...-us-by-january

IHME's current update is projecting just under 317k by 1 January and 389k by 1 Feb.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 10-18-2020, 09:51 AM
  #83  
The Fallen Cherub
 
Lucifer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Position: Wings & Prayer
Posts: 143
Default

Originally Posted by rld1k
number of cases is a useless metric
Yes and No.
It is effective for inducing fear.
Lucifer is offline  
Old 10-18-2020, 09:55 AM
  #84  
The Fallen Cherub
 
Lucifer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Position: Wings & Prayer
Posts: 143
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
The "400k dead by the end of the year" came from an update to the IHME model over a month ago.

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcar...-us-by-january

IHME's current update is projecting just under 317k by 1 January and 389k by 1 Feb.
Biden has been using those ridiculous numbers also. The average has been roughly 20,000 per month....
Meanwhile, we now have a better understanding of the virus, more effective drugs, and are treating it sooner rather than telling people to stay home until they need a ventilator.
Lucifer is offline  
Old 10-18-2020, 09:55 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,063
Default

Originally Posted by Knobcrk1
This is a complete distortion of reality. They’re not saying they’d rather die than not be able to touch their loved ones. They just don’t want to be socially distant. Nowhere in the story does it state elderly should die or are ok with dying because they only have 6 or 12 months left, those are just the voices in your head. They do want to keep living so they can see their families and grand kids.
One of their signs literally read "I'd rather die of Covid than loneliness". More lies and distortions from you, but for what reason?
Flyfalcons is offline  
Old 10-18-2020, 10:15 AM
  #86  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,222
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
The "400k dead by the end of the year" came from an update to the IHME model over a month ago.

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcar...-us-by-january

IHME's current update is projecting just under 317k by 1 January and 389k by 1 Feb.
Was that the same IHME 2.2 million deaths model? We should follow them like England follows that other quack
kingairfun is offline  
Old 10-18-2020, 10:34 AM
  #87  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,564
Default

Originally Posted by kingairfun
Was that the same IHME 2.2 million deaths model? We should follow them like England follows that other quack

Imperial College at Neil Ferguson did the infamous “2.2M Americans dead with no interventions” model...not IHME.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 10-18-2020, 10:45 AM
  #88  
Speed, Power, Accuracy
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,706
Default

Originally Posted by Knobcrk1
Looking at the graph the case numbers would have to be a bit higher for deaths to be rising. The cases have been on a steady rise the last few weeks. Let’s hope the deaths do stay lower though. The predictions are up to 400k dead by January.
You still are bad at math. 73 days left in the year. Fewer than 900 per day and falling. 225,000 now. That’s under 300,000. Stop listening to what “they” predict. It’s a pantload of horse puckey.
GeeWizDriver is offline  
Old 10-18-2020, 11:32 AM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 241
Default

Originally Posted by Seneca Pilot
Actually one could argue that once people are mandated to wear masks they gain a false sense of security and stop social distancing because they are wearing a thin piece of cloth over their nose (possibly) and mouth. It could mean that they begin congregating in large groups that they would avoid if they weren't "protecting" themselves with masks. The havoc on our economies is due to the unnecessary lockdowns that have been ineffective in preventing the spread of the virus. If you want to know how this should have been done see Sweden. No lockdown, common sense directives focused on proper hygiene and social distancing, and mask wear where appropriate. What prolongs the problem is the constant on again/off again lockdowns that continually kick the can down the road. This virus will work its way through the population, they always do.
This. ^^^^^
Think about how fast people drive because they know they'll PROBABLY walk away from it thanks to advanced safety systems like seatbelts and airbags. Not saying you shouldn't wear a seatbelt, just that people will perceive less danger and push the limit further. Humans are notoriously bad at judging actual risk. We gauge perceived risk mostly on past experience and observation of others' behavior. Masks reduce perceived risk, which is great for stuffing people into airplanes.
Escargot is offline  
Old 10-18-2020, 05:20 PM
  #90  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Fully Retired
Posts: 7,000
Default

Didn’t I read the average person on a survey thought the fatality poll in the US was 9% of the population.

That would be 30 million dead, not in the 220,000 dead range.
TransWorld is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scoop
Delta
26
02-07-2017 10:27 AM
UALinIAH
United
100
02-07-2017 05:38 AM
rickair7777
Safety
28
04-24-2016 11:27 AM
Bocaflyer
Fractional
26
06-26-2007 09:13 PM
navyman_tx
Hangar Talk
3
08-16-2006 02:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices