GateAgent007

No. I'm not. Thanks for asking. I can tell by the lack of response that you're shook. My turn.

If Trump loses in court, but still retains power through a coup or other means, will you accept his 2nd term as legitimate?

furloughfuntime

lol keep holding your breath with those frivolous lawsuits. Even lawyers don't want to touch this nonsense with a 10 foot pole. He lost by millions of votes and you're still crying about it.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/1...ampaign-436418

Did you cry when you found out Biden won? Or have you been holding back the tears while you wait for these frivolous arguments to be thrown out by the courts?

NE_Pilot

Good comeback, I know you are but what am I?

I would not, but I highly doubt he will. I answered, will you?

Nacho Libre

PA Supreme Court reverses rare Trump win.

https://news.yahoo.com/pennsylvania-...224100013.html


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/202...rvers-n1248046

NE_Pilot

Not at all, I didn’t vote for Trump in 2016 or 2020. I just think it’s funny the same people who spent the last four years trying to undermine and delegitimize Trump are acting surprised when the same thing is starting to happen to Biden.

furloughfuntime

It is not the same thing. 2016 saw election interference on the part of Russia. Russian interference in the election of 2016 is a fact. Russian interference was intended to benefit Donald Trump, and that is also a fact. The Russia investigation sought to determine whether or not the Trump campaign welcomed that interference. The evidence was, legally speaking, inconclusive, and how you see it depends on where you stand politically. When a foreign nation disrupts our election, it is reasonable to expect an investigation into the matter. Remember, this investigation resulted in Trump's closest allies going to jail. Hoax, it was not.

In addition, Obama never refused to give Trump the national security briefings after he won. Obama did all he could to help Trump transition into the job. Trump is refusing to give Biden the briefings he needs to transition, and is undermining American national securiy. Some have argued that 911 happened, in part, due to failures in the presidential transition of 2000. This is a national security issue.

Keep telling yourself it's the same thing, but anyone who looks at the facts can tell that it is obviously not the "same thing." It's not worth using facts to argue with a shill like you though, because all you post is political hyperbole and nonsensical fake news.

GateAgent007

For that hypothetical situation, there would have to be iron clad evidence of election tampering or voter fraud. I'm talking video proof, not some Project Veritas paid shill. Like trucks on camera pulling up to the counting rooms around the nation and dumping stacks of ballots meanwhile discussing on camera how they are "stealing the election."

Beyond iron clad.

But that didn't happen. How do we know? Because all the major counting rooms have been livestreaming since election day. And complaining that a vote counter 'rolled their eyes' while opening up a Trump ballot isn't quite enough evidence to convince me, or the courts, to overturn this election.

highfarfast

Every time someone uses "people close to Trump went to jail" as confirmation the Russia investigation was legit, I know it's time to ignore them due to the intellectual dishonesty.

furloughfuntime

So that's intellectually dishonest, but saying that the Russia investigation was a hoax when there is objective evidence of Russian interference is okay?
What about the Trump campaign's chants of "count the votes" in Arizona while simultaneously yelling to "stop the count" in Pennsylvania? Is that "intellectually dishonest" too?


GMAFB. You don't care about intellectual honesty at all. You just don't like that you came across facts that hurt your feelings.

emersonbiguns

Interesting reading....

Public health nurse in rural Missouri dealing with the ignorant.

Luckily she came to her senses and realized that you can't fix stupid.