Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
Fox News:  surge in new cases >

Fox News: surge in new cases

Search

Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

Fox News: surge in new cases

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-14-2020, 09:18 PM
  #641  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Under beer over couch after skool
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by Wingedbeast
Half those things are your opinion (a wrong one at that).
The others I don't see as negative.
Can you point out the half you think aren’t negative?
Ronaldo is offline  
Old 11-14-2020, 09:37 PM
  #642  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Under beer over couch after skool
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by NE_Pilot
Once again, you are getting caught up in the idea that “peer review” is meaningful. Since you believe that peer reviewed studies should only be used when making public health policies, what peer reviewed study did the CDC rely on when recommending that Americans wear face coverings?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK215260/

The first paragraph describes “reproducible” as a criteria used in several fields. If you remember the “plandemic” wack job, some of her studies, including one relied on heavily, failed peer review because her work was not reproducible, later it was determined she fabricated the data.

Not all peer review involves re-analysis of the data or reproduction of the experiment, but some does. In either case peer review is a critical step that eliminates a large quantity of bogus science. In many journals, less than 50% of papers make it through peer review.
Ronaldo is offline  
Old 11-15-2020, 12:31 AM
  #643  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BrazilBusDriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 366
Default

Originally Posted by NE_Pilot
I don’t think you know what peer review is. Peer review does not test hypothesis, or rerun experiments or studies. It does not see if the results can be duplicated. Peer review does not even verify that the data being used is correct.
No, it’s usually none of that, nor is it supposed to be. It’s basically a form of sanity test amongst your expert peers. All of that other stuff you’re going on about like it’s some kind of smoking gun indictment is usually up to others in your field to do, if they so choose, which is why the methodology is also published in peer-reviewed journals. You’d probably be surprised to know that I understand the process, if you cared - but i suspect you don’t. Anyway, what’s your actual point, other than “peer review sux”? Proving you went to grad school?

I don’t think you understand the point of peer review. See, I can do it, too? Doesn’t add much to the conversation without stating why you think it matters.
BrazilBusDriver is offline  
Old 11-15-2020, 03:04 AM
  #644  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 762
Default

Originally Posted by Ronaldo
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK215260/

The first paragraph describes “reproducible” as a criteria used in several fields. If you remember the “plandemic” wack job, some of her studies, including one relied on heavily, failed peer review because her work was not reproducible, later it was determined she fabricated the data.

Not all peer review involves re-analysis of the data or reproduction of the experiment, but some does. In either case peer review is a critical step that eliminates a large quantity of bogus science. In many journals, less than 50% of papers make it through peer review.
From your link:
In most fields of science, for instance, experimental observations must be shown to be reproducible in order to be creditable.1 Other practices include checking and rechecking data to ensure that the interpretation is valid, and also submitting the results to peer review
NE_Pilot is offline  
Old 11-15-2020, 03:15 AM
  #645  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 762
Default

Originally Posted by BrazilBusDriver
No, it’s usually none of that, nor is it supposed to be. It’s basically a form of sanity test amongst your expert peers. All of that other stuff you’re going on about like it’s some kind of smoking gun indictment is usually up to others in your field to do, if they so choose, which is why the methodology is also published in peer-reviewed journals. You’d probably be surprised to know that I understand the process, if you cared - but i suspect you don’t. Anyway, what’s your actual point, other than “peer review sux”? Proving you went to grad school?

I don’t think you understand the point of peer review. See, I can do it, too? Doesn’t add much to the conversation without stating why you think it matters.
I do understand the point of peer review. How peer review is used here, and by the media, is not in keeping with the purpose of peer review.

Peer review is more akin to proofreading. As I stated before, peer review does not determine whether something is true or not. A study being peer reviewed is not meaningful in determining whether it is right. There are a fair number of studies that get through the peer review process and are later found to be untrue.

Too many people treat peer review as the end when it is really closer to the beginning of the scientific process.

Edit: To add, peer review also suffers from the influence of bias in both what gets to peer review and the level of scrutiny applied in the peer review process.
NE_Pilot is offline  
Old 11-15-2020, 10:30 AM
  #646  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,316
Default

Originally Posted by senecacaptain
thanks

Not in dispute:

Cases climbing at alarming rate
Deaths also climbing
At 2M deaths (likely) over 12 month period, COVID death rate is 3X that of the flu (assuming 650k a year)
Hospitals nearing capacity in many areas
Covid has been here since December and there is evidence that it was even here in November. We are nowhere near 650k deaths. Especially since motorcycle crashes and cancer deaths are being counted as covid. Also, what proof do you have that hospitals are getting close to capacity “in many areas”? I remember MSM making those claims the last go around, I would be by those same hospitals and nothing was going on. There were even people going to emergency rooms, asking staff and there was no apocalypse. Unless you go to these hospitals and physically confirm that in fact is happening, it’s just media hype.
Xtreme87 is offline  
Old 11-15-2020, 10:52 AM
  #647  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Posts: 237
Default

Originally Posted by Xtreme87
Covid has been here since December and there is evidence that it was even here in November. We are nowhere near 650k deaths. Especially since motorcycle crashes and cancer deaths are being counted as covid. Also, what proof do you have that hospitals are getting close to capacity “in many areas”? I remember MSM making those claims the last go around, I would be by those same hospitals and nothing was going on. There were even people going to emergency rooms, asking staff and there was no apocalypse. Unless you go to these hospitals and physically confirm that in fact is happening, it’s just media hype.
So let me get this straight. You'd rather believe that there's a global conspiracy to inflate COVID deaths around the world- where doctors are putting their licenses at risk to fraudulently fill out death certificates, rather than believe a new virus with limited treatment actually kills people?

Try to walk me through your rat's nest of ideas. Why is global conspiracy more viable when a deadly virus is not? You realize that there's no way that anyone could defraud 100,000+ deaths and not get caught, right?

It's almost as if you see something you don't like the results of you're inclined to blame fraud... wait that sounds very familiar...
GateAgent007 is offline  
Old 11-15-2020, 11:05 AM
  #648  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,030
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
No, I haven't changed my stance on masks, they have no impact on the pandemic.
You’re just completely wrong. The rise in cases are due to family get togethers, bars, restaurants, demonstrations and college kids spreading it around. Masks save lives. I’d suggest you stop listening to the voices in your head, they seem to be doing you wrong.
Knobcrk1 is offline  
Old 11-15-2020, 11:22 AM
  #649  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,030
Default

Originally Posted by germanaviator
With all due respect but if you are not trolling you must be a bit dim in the head. Events such as family gatherings are where transmissions happen. I managed to fly throughout Europe including all the hot spots this last spring and Summer. Wore masks indoors where distancing was not assured. No infection. My brother comes over last month for my son's birthday and infects my wife and me. Of course no masks we're worn by any of us in the house. My brother was one of only two guests as we wanted to reduce the risk to everyone. My brother didn't know then that he was infected. He became symptomatic one day later. He then got tested.

I am not suggesting my little anecdote proves anything but it is completely in line with what the vast majority of expects are saying about transmissions. They mainly happen when people are in direct face to face contact without distancing and without masks.

It won’t do much good. You’re viewing the issue as a matter of saving lives, doing the right thing. They’re viewing it as an act of it taking their “rights” away. Searching the internet for any supporting views. They would rather have bodies stacked up in trucks than comply. I guess all we can do is make fun of them.
Knobcrk1 is offline  
Old 11-15-2020, 11:36 AM
  #650  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,030
Default

Originally Posted by luke3
i spent a good amount of time in Europe this month and last. Nobody cares there anymore. Mask use was very limited until they locked down again. I noticed much more widespread mask usage in the US than the 2 european countries I visited. My parents that live in yet anothet european country said it's the same there too: mask mandates loosely followed and not enforced.
Europe was locked down much longer at the start of the Pandemic than us. We still had cases with a downward trend when we opened, I don’t think there was a state that followed the proper reopening guidelines other than just a downward trend. Europe literally beat it practically with very low cases, some zero, when they opened again. It’s completely expected for them to not worry about masks because there were very little cases. They’re wearing their masks now though so masks are needed to control the pandemic.
Knobcrk1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scoop
Delta
26
02-07-2017 10:27 AM
UALinIAH
United
100
02-07-2017 05:38 AM
rickair7777
Safety
28
04-24-2016 11:27 AM
Bocaflyer
Fractional
26
06-26-2007 09:13 PM
navyman_tx
Hangar Talk
3
08-16-2006 02:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices