Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
Fox News:  surge in new cases >

Fox News: surge in new cases

Search

Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

Fox News: surge in new cases

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2020, 07:46 PM
  #591  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Under beer over couch after skool
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by emersonbiguns
My wife captured this after dropping me at the airport this afternoon....

(I didn’t ask her if he was flying a Trump flag.)
He/she can’t be a Trumpanzee without truck ballz.

I’m curious what the maskdebaters have to say about the CDC recommendations today. Are they part of the plandemic? Does the fact that the world is flat, make your germs fall straight down? Covering your mouth during a sneeze is a commie plot? Bill Gates hacked thermometers to read higher for cold blooded reptilian overlord leaders? Where are we today?
Ronaldo is offline  
Old 11-12-2020, 10:06 PM
  #592  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Massive study of mask mandates, 1000+ counties.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....21.20208728v2
Mesabah is offline  
Old 11-12-2020, 11:25 PM
  #593  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Bizjet Captain
Posts: 252
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
No, I haven't changed my stance on masks, they have no impact on the pandemic.
With all due respect but if you are not trolling you must be a bit dim in the head. Events such as family gatherings are where transmissions happen. I managed to fly throughout Europe including all the hot spots this last spring and Summer. Wore masks indoors where distancing was not assured. No infection. My brother comes over last month for my son's birthday and infects my wife and me. Of course no masks we're worn by any of us in the house. My brother was one of only two guests as we wanted to reduce the risk to everyone. My brother didn't know then that he was infected. He became symptomatic one day later. He then got tested.

I am not suggesting my little anecdote proves anything but it is completely in line with what the vast majority of expects are saying about transmissions. They mainly happen when people are in direct face to face contact without distancing and without masks.
germanaviator is offline  
Old 11-13-2020, 12:54 AM
  #594  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 1,901
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Massive study of mask mandates, 1000+ counties.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....21.20208728v2
As usual, it’s not a reliable source:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MedRxiv


Medrxiv (pronounced "med-archive", as "med - r chi ve") is an Internet site distributing unpublished eprints about health sciences.[2][3][4][5] It distributes complete but unpublished manuscripts in the areas of medicine, clinical research, and related health sciences without charge to the reader. Such manuscripts have yet to undergo peer review and the site notes that preliminary status and that the manuscripts should not be considered for clinical application, nor relied upon for news reporting as established information.
I used to wonder how people fall for things like the Nigerian prince email scam, but after seeing some of the nonsense posted at APC I don’t wonder anymore.
wrxpilot is offline  
Old 11-13-2020, 01:11 AM
  #595  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 762
Default

Originally Posted by wrxpilot
As usual, it’s not a reliable source:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MedRxiv




I used to wonder how people fall for things like the Nigerian prince email scam, but after seeing some of the nonsense posted at APC I don’t wonder anymore.
That’s not what the Wikipedia article says, but it is funny that you consider Wikipedia a “reliable source”. It says the articles are not yet peer reviewed, but peer review has no bearing on whether something is true or not, or whether the “science” is accurate.
NE_Pilot is offline  
Old 11-13-2020, 01:25 AM
  #596  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 1,901
Default

Originally Posted by NE_Pilot
That’s not what the Wikipedia article says, but it is funny that you consider Wikipedia a “reliable source”. It says the articles are not yet peer reviewed, but peer review has no bearing on whether something is true or not, or whether the “science” is accurate.

Sigh...

https://yoda.yale.edu/medrxiv

Please note: although documents are screened prior to posting, medRxiv preprints are not formally peer reviewed and any content or results should not be used for clinical medicine.
What’s even funnier, is right in Mesabah’s own link is the following header:

Withdrawal The authors have withdrawn this manuscript because there are increased rates of SARS- CoV-2 cases in the areas that we originally analyzed in this study.
wrxpilot is offline  
Old 11-13-2020, 02:31 AM
  #597  
777 - ret
 
Huell's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Position: Waco CG-4 center seat
Posts: 863
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Stop spreading misinformation, the US is one of the highest masked countries in the world.
Masked countries? I bet we have the highest number of unmasked people for a masked country ... it might be contrary to medical advice or common sense but it’s all about individual rights. Went into Cabelas yesterday ... about 80% of the customers were exercising their rights ... morons in my opinion.
Huell is offline  
Old 11-13-2020, 04:10 AM
  #598  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 762
Default

Originally Posted by wrxpilot
Sigh...

https://yoda.yale.edu/medrxiv



What’s even funnier, is right in Mesabah’s own link is the following header:
Once again what you quote doesn’t say the site is unreliable, it says the articles have yet to be peer reviewed. Peer review does not make something reliable.
NE_Pilot is offline  
Old 11-13-2020, 04:25 AM
  #599  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 1,901
Default

Originally Posted by NE_Pilot
Once again what you quote doesn’t say the site is unreliable, it says the articles have yet to be peer reviewed. Peer review does not make something reliable.

Oh? I guess I’ll quote it again:

Please note: although documents are screened prior to posting, medRxiv preprints are not formally peer reviewed and any content or results should not be used for clinical medicine.
Sounds to me like it’s not a reliable source of information for making decisions or policy for clinical medicine. If you think anything on there can somehow be used to create public health policies, I’m all ears.
wrxpilot is offline  
Old 11-13-2020, 04:31 AM
  #600  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 762
Default

Originally Posted by wrxpilot
Oh? I guess I’ll quote it again:



Sounds to me like it’s not a reliable source of information for making decisions or policy for clinical medicine. If you think anything on there can somehow be used to create public health policies, I’m all ears.
Once again, if you think peer review is meaningful in determining whether something is reliable, you are mistaken.
NE_Pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scoop
Delta
26
02-07-2017 10:27 AM
UALinIAH
United
100
02-07-2017 05:38 AM
rickair7777
Safety
28
04-24-2016 11:27 AM
Bocaflyer
Fractional
26
06-26-2007 09:13 PM
navyman_tx
Hangar Talk
3
08-16-2006 02:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices