TSA numbers above 100k seven days in row
#341
Seriously? Have you cranked the numbers for what another 18 weeks of 19.4% week over week would give us? It would give us (1.194)^18 times what we have today.
1.194^18 = 24.3
That would be damn near 5 million pax a day. No way CAN it stay this high that long. And until/unless places like Hawaii and Disney Land and Disney World really open up, I can’t see even domestic flying getting back to more than 90% of normal. International? Probably later yet.
1.194^18 = 24.3
That would be damn near 5 million pax a day. No way CAN it stay this high that long. And until/unless places like Hawaii and Disney Land and Disney World really open up, I can’t see even domestic flying getting back to more than 90% of normal. International? Probably later yet.
If you do want to predict what traffic looks like at some point, look into how various forecasts are done and what a Gompertz curve is. That will be still be guesswork, but it'll be far closer to whatever ends up happening than will a simple exponential rise.
Last edited by bradthepilot; 05-20-2020 at 07:39 PM.
#342
Have you done the math on what the current first order derivative is doing? How's the second order derivative going? That needs to turn around and what I was referring to, because if it doesn't the TSA screening numbers will start shrinking again within the next 14 days. I'm not predicting that - I'm not predicting anything - but applying simple math as you've done is not helpful for identifying trends.
If you do want to predict what traffic looks like at some point, look into how various forecasts are done and what a Gompertz curve is. That will be still be guesswork, but it'll be far closer to whatever ends up happening than will a simple exponential rise.
If you do want to predict what traffic looks like at some point, look into how various forecasts are done and what a Gompertz curve is. That will be still be guesswork, but it'll be far closer to whatever ends up happening than will a simple exponential rise.
Originally Posted by bradthepilot [img]/images/buttons/viewpost.gif[/img]
The growth trend has already turned around as the growth rate has been falling since approximately May 4th, reaching a seven day rolling average peak of 29.1%. That average is now down to 19.4%, with multiple days lower than that. I hope it reverses again soon.
The growth trend has already turned around as the growth rate has been falling since approximately May 4th, reaching a seven day rolling average peak of 29.1%. That average is now down to 19.4%, with multiple days lower than that. I hope it reverses again soon.
Originally Posted by Excargodog [img]/images/buttons/viewpost.gif[/img]
Seriously? Have you cranked the numbers for what another 18 weeks of 19.4% week over week would give us? It would give us (1.194)^18 times what we have today.
1.194^18 = 24.3
That would be damn near 5 million pax a day. No way CAN it stay this high that long. And until/unless places like Hawaii and Disney Land and Disney World really open up, I can’t see even domestic flying getting back to more than 90% of normal. International? Probably later yet.
Seriously? Have you cranked the numbers for what another 18 weeks of 19.4% week over week would give us? It would give us (1.194)^18 times what we have today.
1.194^18 = 24.3
That would be damn near 5 million pax a day. No way CAN it stay this high that long. And until/unless places like Hawaii and Disney Land and Disney World really open up, I can’t see even domestic flying getting back to more than 90% of normal. International? Probably later yet.
#343
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,555
TSA numbers above 100k seven days in row
230,367
9.3% of last year
30% gain over last week
Same week over week gain last year was 5%
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
9.3% of last year
30% gain over last week
Same week over week gain last year was 5%
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#344
Predicting around 270,000 for the 21st. Should be a new record with just short of 300,000 on the 24th. Going to guess around 290k for the 24th
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#345
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,084
Interesting how doing a search for 'Neil Ferguson coronavirus' finds mostly right (and far right) leaning sources creating 'controversy' from this. The predicted number was if respective governments did nothing and Ferguson has always freely admitted better to be on the high side than the other way around. It's a forecast model with so many variables and the conservative media of course takes the high end of that number to parade how wrong he was. At the same time anyone previously using that number as a certainty to spread fear was equally as guilty of dubious claims. Directly from the report itself:
#346
I have circled the last two weeks Tuesday to Wednesday numbers. Obviously I can’t predict what is going to happen I have a very base level knowledge about these things but I wanted to get someone whose smarter than me to take a look. Each week follows a pretty clear pattern but if we look at today it seems to me that this Thursday through Sunday is going to blast right through 10% and 300,000.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#347
I was not never PREDICTING what the outcome would be, I was responding to your hope that the growth trend would reverse its decline and go back up, and demonstrating how improbable - essentially impossible - that a sustained growth rate week over week of over 19.4% is.
I think something like that needs to happen if we're going to get to 80% of 2019 numbers by Q1-Q2 next year. Again, check out what a typical growth curve looks like - it accelerates, stays steady for a while, then slows. We need some steady growth in the neighborhood of 20% for several weeks before it starts to slow again to hit those kinds of numbers. The curve will will be a sigmoid and will look something like the one below. In the graph below, the second order derivative increases then goes to zero for a while and the longer it is above zero the greater the rate of growth is during the second part of the curve. During the second part, the growth rate is essentially steady, which means the second order derivative is approximately zero. It stays that way until the third portion, where the growth rate slows - thus the second order derivative going negative - and the upper limit (whatever that may be) is approached.
Probably too much math. I went to school for engineering (lots of math) and later went back and added computer science (lots more math), and used both in modeling and developing control systems along with various other things before picking up this flying gig. Call it a force of habit.
#348
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,030
Sweden also as of last week had a really big spike in deaths per capita. They were scrambling to put a stop on increase of the virus, again per capita.
As far as the Tsa numbers, there’s no chance we will have any kind of normalcy this year, there’s a pandemic going on wether people choose to believe it real or not. There has not been a successful drop yet just a flattening. Until we’re down to near zero cases most won’t fly. Vegas and Disney land will be there next year.
#349
Seems like we are saying the same thing, just differently. At the start there is a geometric growth, but as you approach a limiting factor, the growth rate must taper off, yielding the curve you show. My point was that the initial growth rate was unsustainable, your point appears to be that you do not think we are yet out of the geometric portion of the growth rate. Seems like we were largely talking past each other rather than disagreeing.
The bottom line - in any event - is that we are coming back. The real question is :
At what point to we hit a limiting factor that (groan) “flattens the curve.”
The bottom line - in any event - is that we are coming back. The real question is :
At what point to we hit a limiting factor that (groan) “flattens the curve.”
#350
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,029
TSA numbers above 100k seven days in row
I was referring to the second order derivate, which is a calculus concept. The first order derivative is the rate at which it the data is changing, which is the growth rate. The second order derivative is the rate at which the growth rate is changing. Prior to today's numbers, it was in an accelerating free fall. It's leveled out today, which is the change I was hoping for.
I think something like that needs to happen if we're going to get to 80% of 2019 numbers by Q1-Q2 next year. Again, check out what a typical growth curve looks like - it accelerates, stays steady for a while, then slows. We need some steady growth in the neighborhood of 20% for several weeks before it starts to slow again to hit those kinds of numbers. The curve will will be a sigmoid and will look something like the one below. In the graph below, the second order derivative increases then goes to zero for a while and the longer it is above zero the greater the rate of growth is during the second part of the curve. During the second part, the growth rate is essentially steady, which means the second order derivative is approximately zero. It stays that way until the third portion, where the growth rate slows - thus the second order derivative going negative - and the upper limit (whatever that may be) is approached.
Probably too much math. I went to school for engineering (lots of math) and later went back and added computer science (lots more math), and used both in modeling and developing control systems along with various other things before picking up this flying gig. Call it a force of habit.
I think something like that needs to happen if we're going to get to 80% of 2019 numbers by Q1-Q2 next year. Again, check out what a typical growth curve looks like - it accelerates, stays steady for a while, then slows. We need some steady growth in the neighborhood of 20% for several weeks before it starts to slow again to hit those kinds of numbers. The curve will will be a sigmoid and will look something like the one below. In the graph below, the second order derivative increases then goes to zero for a while and the longer it is above zero the greater the rate of growth is during the second part of the curve. During the second part, the growth rate is essentially steady, which means the second order derivative is approximately zero. It stays that way until the third portion, where the growth rate slows - thus the second order derivative going negative - and the upper limit (whatever that may be) is approached.
Probably too much math. I went to school for engineering (lots of math) and later went back and added computer science (lots more math), and used both in modeling and developing control systems along with various other things before picking up this flying gig. Call it a force of habit.
If the 2nd order is flirting with 0 (bouncing around either side of it) wouldn't that mean that the current growth rate is holding relatively steady or am I thinking about that wrong?
Red is growth rate for same day over week prior. Blue is the difference in growth rate same day from the week prior.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post