Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
TSA numbers above 100k seven days in row >

TSA numbers above 100k seven days in row

Search

Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

TSA numbers above 100k seven days in row

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-2020, 08:03 PM
  #1421  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,168
Default

Originally Posted by Knobcrk1
Schools and universities this Fall will be dangerous hot spots if left unchecked so not sure what those docs are talking about. That is if they even open. Add in the flu season and it will be a long winter.
Thier open now for grad student, thousands of them including staff on campus now, it’s in SoCal and thier talking about a vaccine. Your hurting your own argument which I half agree with at this point. P.s my sister is a middle school teacher with immune issues so I get the challenges. Out for real this time.

Last edited by fcoolaiddrinker; 07-14-2020 at 08:29 PM.
fcoolaiddrinker is offline  
Old 07-14-2020, 08:10 PM
  #1422  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by senecacaptain
26.7% of 2019 levels. We are still in that 25-30% zone stuck in the mud
We didn’t even hit 25 steady till July 4. We are not stuck.
pangolin is offline  
Old 07-15-2020, 04:14 AM
  #1423  
Gets Weekends Off
 
biigD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,778
Default

Only 540,268 for yesterday (7/14). Granted it was a Tuesday, but that's about 22% of last year's. Not the direction I like to see!
biigD is offline  
Old 07-15-2020, 04:20 AM
  #1424  
Gets Weekends Off
 
moonraker9's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Posts: 376
Default

Originally Posted by biigD
Only 540,268 for yesterday (7/14). Granted it was a Tuesday, but that's about 22% of last year's. Not the direction I like to see!
yeah, that is a gut punch for sure
moonraker9 is offline  
Old 07-15-2020, 04:56 AM
  #1425  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 1,256
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
We didn’t even hit 25 steady till July 4. We are not stuck.
you are correct. we are not. We went backwards to 22% for July 14.

We left the 25%-30% zone. Just did it in the wrong direction.
senecacaptain is offline  
Old 07-15-2020, 04:59 AM
  #1426  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Position: A-320 FO
Posts: 34
Default

Not what I like to see either. Looking back June 30th was at about 21% and July 7th was 25%. So... maybe just flat this week?
apes10 is offline  
Old 07-15-2020, 06:56 AM
  #1427  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bradthepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by apes10
Not what I like to see either. Looking back June 30th was at about 21% and July 7th was 25%. So... maybe just flat this week?
Based on the TSA data alone, there is no reason to think that the numbers will not continue to decrease. This is consistent with multiple airlines reporting a decline in bookings and media reporting a rise in confirmed infections.
bradthepilot is offline  
Old 07-15-2020, 07:26 AM
  #1428  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Underpaid, LCC
Posts: 277
Default

When cases go up, bookings go down, followed by TSA numbers down. This is an instance where simple conclusions can be drawn.
Nacho Libre is offline  
Old 07-15-2020, 10:13 AM
  #1429  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,200
Default

Originally Posted by WutFace
There's a disturbing trend of decisions being made that assume this crisis will be over in a short amount of time. It's preventing us from making real progress because we're unwilling to take big steps in confronting the virus.

We're always surprised when the outbreak outlasts our "estimations."
While I do not - as a general rule - agree with Wutface, even a broken clock is right twice a day.

The Spanish flu resolved itself in two years, largely by killing off the most vulnerable and then being supplanted by different flu strains, and that MAY happen with COVID. But those who believe a vaccine will be some immediate panacea are - I believe - fooling themselves.

Mass immunization programs take years - if not decades. And the latest NEJM I saw on vaccines was a three leg 45 subject test at three different dosages to establish safety of three different dosages.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2022483





The highest dose group was cancelled due to excessive side effects and the two remaining groups still had mild to moderate side effects in about half of their subjects with the second immunization. Generally speaking, side effects of immunizations follow a bell shaped curve and if you are getting moderate side effects in a group of 15 and extrapolate that to a couple thousand people you will have at least a few serious reactions. That’s a long way from a “safe” immunization, at least for those Healthy people under 40 who remain at pretty low risk for serious illness or death from COVID.

And while I may not agree with Wutface on precisely what those “big steps in confronting the virus” may be, I think that anyone putting all their eggs in the a-vaccine-will-make-this-all-better basket is likely to be disappointed.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 07-15-2020, 10:27 AM
  #1430  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 93
Default

https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2020/07/15/new-data-on-t-cells-and-the-coronavirus

Growing evidence that T cells are generated after COVID infection and possible existing immunity in 50% of people who have never been exposed to either SARS or COVID. Also found that T cells from the original SARS are lasting for 17 years.

Highlights from group that did study:

1) Infection with SARS-CoV-2 induces virus-specific T cells.

2) Patients recovered from SARS 17 years ago still possess virus-specific memory T cells displaying cross-reactivity to SARS-CoV-2.

3) Over 50% of donors with no infection or contact with SARS-CoV-1/2 harbor expandable T cells cross-reactive to SARS-CoV-2 likely induced by contact or infection with other coronavirus strains.

These results might explain why so many people are asymptomatic and might also mean “herd immunity” could be reached at a lower infection rate due to pre existing immunity from exposure to other coronaviruses.

Link to new study published today:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2550-z
UnderCenter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flogger
GoJet
41
10-01-2022 06:29 PM
Foxcow
Regional
200
09-13-2009 09:00 PM
skippy
GoJet
4
05-11-2009 08:55 PM
bugga
Foreign
25
03-19-2007 11:32 AM
Hornetguy
Fractional
2
02-26-2007 12:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices