Best corporate jet type rating?
#1
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 36
Best corporate jet type rating?
What is the best corporate jet type rating for someone looking to work on a contract basis; (day to day). Looking for most common airframe so easy to get work, but at same time max pay per day. Have over 12,000 hours international time.
Thanks!
Thanks!
#3
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: MD-80 Right
Posts: 35
50k plus?? What type is that? I always thought B200 training is good to have. You can find places to get good and inexpensive training all over the country. It really depends on what part of the country you live in and what type of flying you want to do. I'd start by going to the local airports and see what planes are parked. Citation types are cheap to come by and you can get $500-$700 a day (at least in florida)
#4
At least in my world, the demand is for GLEX/G550 size planes for international work, as the OP stated. In that class, there is pretty constant work for experienced guys. Those ratings are $50K, minimum.
GF
GF
#5
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 80
Without time in type and a good network of people, a Global/G550 type isn't quite as valuable. To get customers quicker, maybe go out the your local airport, count the number of Citations/Lears/Hawkers and go with the higher number...Payoff would happen 5 times faster probably--plus you'd be building a name for yourself--and then those operaters may be upgrading... Most of the contract guys work a 1/4 of the year to just pay their recurrent costs...not even including startup/initial costs.
#6
Obviously the best type-ratings to have would be the heavy jets (G-450/V/550, Globals, 7X, BBJ). Those birds definetly pay the most.. the problem with these heavy aircraft is that it will be very difficult to find contract work or get on with a flight department with 0 time... they're gonna want you to have considerable international experience... You could be asked to fly into a small airport in Nigeria or Russia in the middle of the night, they're not going to send you there with zero time in the airplane. So they look for guys with extensive int'l time and time in the plane
I'd say the Citation X, CL604/605 or Falcon 2000 give you the best chance at landing a corporate job or finding contract work. and even though those airplanes do go overseas, I don't think they're going to demand you have int'l experience.
my 2 cents
I'd say the Citation X, CL604/605 or Falcon 2000 give you the best chance at landing a corporate job or finding contract work. and even though those airplanes do go overseas, I don't think they're going to demand you have int'l experience.
my 2 cents
#7
Originally Posted by BlackRocket
Have over 12,000 hours international time.
As others have said, without time in type and/or a regular client already lined up you'd likely be wasting tens of thousands of dollars.
#8
One guy flies a CL604 for a fortune 100 company. it worked out for him very nicely, I ran into him last week in London. He's having a good time
But I don't think I would do that, huge gumble, if it doesn't work out, you'd be paying those credit cards for a looooooong time
#9
Oh, boy. How many times have I heard that before. We need some skill that you don't have on paper. I have done a very large variety of flying throughout the world. Never had a any trouble yet. Going on 23 years now.
Please save the fluff.
Please save the fluff.
#10
Contacts are big. "Fly contract" is probably the most utilized website for finding contract pilots. It would probably be a good idea to contact some of those fellows and see how business is going for them; be it a Gulfstream, Global, Lear, Hawker or whatever.
Contract is truely a feast or famine gig. It also sucks when you've already committed to that day trip next week only to have to forgo that 12 day South American tour.
Contract is truely a feast or famine gig. It also sucks when you've already committed to that day trip next week only to have to forgo that 12 day South American tour.
Last edited by Hawker Driver; 11-10-2012 at 03:00 PM. Reason: Grammar
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post