Search

Notices
Compass Airlines Regional Airline

Compass Updates - Saga Continues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2018, 12:29 PM
  #10381  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 644
Default

Originally Posted by poorflyer
It might be on paycor maybe even the pay stub.
Paycor seems to only show if you used sick time on a payperiod. No accrual. Does your rainmaker have a correct total?
Aviator147 is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 01:25 PM
  #10382  
Gets Weekends Off
 
VIRotate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,401
Default

Originally Posted by Sieve
My complaints of broken planes dropped off dramatically when 747CZ left property. That was one tired girl. Didn't have any real notable maintenance problems since the 170s left.
Good ol 747...I feel bad for the Brickyard guys dealing with that one.
VIRotate is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 02:09 PM
  #10383  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 443
Default

But... But... But... It's a 747! I hear the legacies love to know you've flown one...
FlytheSky is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 02:20 PM
  #10384  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fr8Thrust's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 469
Default

Originally Posted by VIRotate
Good ol 747...I feel bad for the Brickyard guys dealing with that one.
A “unique opportunity” that was “returned to Delta”.

Never forget that our leadership lost six airplanes!
Fr8Thrust is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 02:49 PM
  #10385  
Gets Weekends Off
 
VIRotate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,401
Default

Originally Posted by Fr8Thrust
A “unique opportunity” that was “returned to Delta”.

Never forget that our leadership lost six airplanes!
Because opening an LGA base for 6 planes wouldn’t be economically viable but opening a PHX base with 2, now that’s the ticket.
VIRotate is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 03:48 PM
  #10386  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 443
Default

Originally Posted by VIRotate
Because opening an LGA base for 6 planes wouldn’t be economically viable but opening a PHX base with 2, now that’s the ticket.
I'm not a company man, but I will give them the benefit of the doubt that having a lone base on the opposite side of the country could be logistically difficult. Less so for finding a crew room and opening a crew base, but opening and stocking a dedicated maintenance base and the required equipment and tools to make such a base effective. Even if they did do this, I doubt it would be as financially viable as just using an existing company out there.

Phoenix on the other hand is directly connected to our other bases immediately and isn't really using any different network of planes or maintenance. Since it sounds like space at LAX is at a premium, it makes sense to open maintenance bases at other airports with the space that we visit often, like SJC. Phoenix makes sense since we have so many commuters from there and it gives us more than 2 bases to offer. It's also a base that has a much lower cost of living than LAX or SEA.

Then again, I could be completely wrong, but that's what I tell myself to sleep at night.
FlytheSky is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 04:12 PM
  #10387  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 857
Default

Still holds true that the only reason PHX opened was for recruiting/morale boost. Also the fact still holds that losing 6 airplanes forced the decision to freeze hiring. And if the post a few back was true that AT wanted to furlough how much did the decision to not have the LGA base include the thought of furloughing us? Did BG expect to furlough us because transferring MX to LGA was too expensive? Did we barely keep our jobs after they let the airplanes go? Did delta punish us an LGA was never an option? How much was the cost of LGA vs monthly bonuses? These are all thoughts going through my head and never make me feel confident about mgmt.
poorflyer is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 04:14 PM
  #10388  
Gets Weekends Off
 
VIRotate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,401
Default

Originally Posted by FlytheSky
I'm not a company man, but I will give them the benefit of the doubt that having a lone base on the opposite side of the country could be logistically difficult. Less so for finding a crew room and opening a crew base, but opening and stocking a dedicated maintenance base and the required equipment and tools to make such a base effective. Even if they did do this, I doubt it would be as financially viable as just using an existing company out there.

Phoenix on the other hand is directly connected to our other bases immediately and isn't really using any different network of planes or maintenance. Since it sounds like space at LAX is at a premium, it makes sense to open maintenance bases at other airports with the space that we visit often, like SJC. Phoenix makes sense since we have so many commuters from there and it gives us more than 2 bases to offer. It's also a base that has a much lower cost of living than LAX or SEA.

Then again, I could be completely wrong, but that's what I tell myself to sleep at night.


VIRotate is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 04:15 PM
  #10389  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 212
Default

Originally Posted by FlytheSky
I'm not a company man, but I will give them the benefit of the doubt that having a lone base on the opposite side of the country could be logistically difficult. Less so for finding a crew room and opening a crew base, but opening and stocking a dedicated maintenance base and the required equipment and tools to make such a base effective. Even if they did do this, I doubt it would be as financially viable as just using an existing company out there.

Phoenix on the other hand is directly connected to our other bases immediately and isn't really using any different network of planes or maintenance. Since it sounds like space at LAX is at a premium, it makes sense to open maintenance bases at other airports with the space that we visit often, like SJC. Phoenix makes sense since we have so many commuters from there and it gives us more than 2 bases to offer. It's also a base that has a much lower cost of living than LAX or SEA.

Then again, I could be completely wrong, but that's what I tell myself to sleep at night.
I see It mainly as a recruiting ploy to the flight schools out there. Then the lower cost of living is huge, possibly to move training out there, who knows... my opinion, which is worth just about nothing, a more central location would have be better like SLC or even DWF. But at the end of the day for bases isn’t a bad thing so glad it’s there
Crimson is offline  
Old 01-09-2018, 04:59 PM
  #10390  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 570
Default

If Compass were to spread east, like LGA, why even go to Compass? A big attraction is the guaranteed west coast bases. If I wanted to go to east I'd go with someone who offers more long term stability (maybe a wholly owned with a flow in my back pocket) and more money. How many regionals can I choose from if I want to be out there? Quite a few. How many for strictly west coast? Two?
Taco280AI is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jparker371
Compass Airlines
9413
03-01-2016 08:57 AM
35RSLC
Compass Airlines
37
05-31-2015 02:58 PM
3inthegreen
Compass Airlines
130
04-14-2015 03:44 PM
drosenst
Compass Airlines
12
11-19-2008 06:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices