Compass updates
#9031
New Hire
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 6
404yxl,
The company will always adjust pairing construction to limit their costs...they will never make them "pilot friendly" as long as it adds one more red cent to their costs. To look how the ADTG would have benefited the pilot group the last 6 months is apples to oranges. The company would have modified the pairing construction to limit their costs.
There still is an outstanding grievance going through arbitration. The ruling should be coming out soon regarding only receiving min day for a duty period. ( 5 day trip, only 4 duty periods, only 4 days pay) If the arbitrator rules in our favor, the pairing construction will have to become more efficient thus creating better pairings for the pilot group. I personally believe the ADTG program was just a shor term carrot and stick the company wanted to dangle in front of the pilot group to sign up for and lock in savings. Ya I agree it was nice for a decent amount of the pilot group, but if the arbitrator rules in our favor on this issue the entire pilot groups pairings will dramatically become more efficient, thus making our regional airline lives a bit easier to bare.
hope I didn't come off in a negative way, just my opinion that's all
Finally cold enough to go fishing!
Fly Safe!
The company will always adjust pairing construction to limit their costs...they will never make them "pilot friendly" as long as it adds one more red cent to their costs. To look how the ADTG would have benefited the pilot group the last 6 months is apples to oranges. The company would have modified the pairing construction to limit their costs.
There still is an outstanding grievance going through arbitration. The ruling should be coming out soon regarding only receiving min day for a duty period. ( 5 day trip, only 4 duty periods, only 4 days pay) If the arbitrator rules in our favor, the pairing construction will have to become more efficient thus creating better pairings for the pilot group. I personally believe the ADTG program was just a shor term carrot and stick the company wanted to dangle in front of the pilot group to sign up for and lock in savings. Ya I agree it was nice for a decent amount of the pilot group, but if the arbitrator rules in our favor on this issue the entire pilot groups pairings will dramatically become more efficient, thus making our regional airline lives a bit easier to bare.
hope I didn't come off in a negative way, just my opinion that's all
Finally cold enough to go fishing!
Fly Safe!
Also you are right when you say the company will always adjust the trip construction to limit cost, so why we opt to take 4hrs instead of 445 for a starting point in constructing trips I do not know.
#9032
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 304
To call the pending grievance outstanding is offensive to the word outstanding. There is no way we win the grievance, the wording is pretty clear in the contract and 404 was even telling us prior to the vote we would see trips pay like this. I voted to keep the 445 and would take it back if it was ever offered back up to us.
Also you are right when you say the company will always adjust the trip construction to limit cost, so why we opt to take 4hrs instead of 445 for a starting point in constructing trips I do not know.
Also you are right when you say the company will always adjust the trip construction to limit cost, so why we opt to take 4hrs instead of 445 for a starting point in constructing trips I do not know.
#9033
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
404yxl,
The company will always adjust pairing construction to limit their costs...they will never make them "pilot friendly" as long as it adds one more red cent to their costs. To look how the ADTG would have benefited the pilot group the last 6 months is apples to oranges. The company would have modified the pairing construction to limit their costs.
The company will always adjust pairing construction to limit their costs...they will never make them "pilot friendly" as long as it adds one more red cent to their costs. To look how the ADTG would have benefited the pilot group the last 6 months is apples to oranges. The company would have modified the pairing construction to limit their costs.
There still is an outstanding grievance going through arbitration. The ruling should be coming out soon regarding only receiving min day for a duty period. ( 5 day trip, only 4 duty periods, only 4 days pay) If the arbitrator rules in our favor, the pairing construction will have to become more efficient thus creating better pairings for the pilot group. I personally believe the ADTG program was just a shor term carrot and stick the company wanted to dangle in front of the pilot group to sign up for and lock in savings. Ya I agree it was nice for a decent amount of the pilot group, but if the arbitrator rules in our favor on this issue the entire pilot groups pairings will dramatically become more efficient, thus making our regional airline lives a bit easier to bare.
You could always create credit with the adtg, but you can't create credit with the 4 hours for a non-working calendar day via partial pickups. Those trips would have to already exist.
As Scaniaflyer said, if you are banking on an arbitrator ruling that "non-working calendar day" doesn't really mean "non-working calendar day", your chances will be slim.
I get all that. The question I'm asking is this: Are there any other current pairings/city pairs/out and backs/ turns/ flights/schedules (besides SEA-FAI-SEA) that would be paid at a higher rate IF adtg was still used like it was previously?
I won't waste my time pouring over the bid packets to find out for myself so I was hoping that someone would know that answer. If so, is the pilot group, overall, hurt by the new 4hr min day?
I won't waste my time pouring over the bid packets to find out for myself so I was hoping that someone would know that answer. If so, is the pilot group, overall, hurt by the new 4hr min day?
I will post it again just in case you missed all of them . I actually screwed up and said 1 day trips paid 4:15. It was actually 4:45, making the PPW pickups even worse.
The only time the 4 hours of pay for a non-working calendar day would pay more would be if a 4 day had a non-working calendar day and paid more than 15:00 with the min duty and leg by leg credits. (adtg would make it 19:00). However, you can see a 4 day worth 16:00 now, or even 12:00 if it incorporates a FAI type layover. Again, with the adtg, it would have paid 19:00. Same concept with 3 and 5 days that have a non-working calendar day.
Basically, only high credit 4 days with a non-working calendar day would see a gain, and those few trips go senior. The adtg helped everyone, reserves all the way up to even senior pilots. It paid SAN turns 4:45 instead of 4:00, 5:56 with the PPW instead of 5:00, 7:07 with critical pickups instead of 6:00 now.
It paid 2 leg 3-days 14:15 instead of the 12:00 we see now with a non-working calendar day, and 8:00 with a FAI layover.
***We also weren't losing adtg credit when we partially dropped turns off our trips. Our contract has us lose min duty credit when we dropped turns, but a bunch of us were dropping turns to other pilots (who benefited from the adtg credit) and worked short 4, 3, and 2-day trips worth 19:00, 14:15, and 9:30, where now they can pay as little as 10:00, 6:00, and 2:00(2-day SAN layover where you dropped everything but the SAN legs would pay 9:30 under adtg and now will only pay what the 2 flight credits are worth).***
Just food for thought if this pilot group is ever lucky to see a adtg offer in the future.
To call the pending grievance outstanding is offensive to the word outstanding. There is no way we win the grievance, the wording is pretty clear in the contract and 404 was even telling us prior to the vote we would see trips pay like this. I voted to keep the 445 and would take it back if it was ever offered back up to us.
Also you are right when you say the company will always adjust the trip construction to limit cost, so why we opt to take 4hrs instead of 445 for a starting point in constructing trips I do not know.
Also you are right when you say the company will always adjust the trip construction to limit cost, so why we opt to take 4hrs instead of 445 for a starting point in constructing trips I do not know.
Only 10% or so of the group voted and I think a majority voted for the 4 hour non-working day option since it went back to our anger over the company never getting us credit for it back in 2014. I was upset with that too, but after I really looked at the adtg option we got, I actually thought it was a far superior deal. I am surprised the company didn't back out themselves. The credit we could create with the adtg was far superior.
The ALPA lawyers are probably advising that there is no shot at winning and also against wasting the resources fighting it.
#9034
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 218
And as for the "non working calendar day"... sort of garbage since you're flying the first two hours of that trip on your so called non working day. That "anything before 2am counts as the previous day" bit is ridiculous. At 12:01 you should get the 4 hours.
Last edited by phalanxo; 01-04-2016 at 05:04 PM.
#9035
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,097
On another note, anybody know where one can find the AA travel "benefits" enrollment form? I can't find it anywhere on our pathetic CP website.
#9036
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,186
Just wondering how long guys are waiting for IOE? I finished LOE on dec/20 and still sitting at home. Not complaining but just wondering how long some guys/girls are waiting for
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post