Losing Delta and New Opportunities

Reply Subscribe

Page 83 of 228

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

10-14-2019, 09:45 PM

#821

StallWeezy

Gets his house in order

Joined APC: Sep 2017

Posts: 315

Quote:

Originally Posted by RemiDenton

But the JS war isn’t about OO vs UAL dick measuring (at least both ways). It’s about one taking advantage of the system and the other evening the playing field. The fact that so many on the message boards don’t get that, blows my mind.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So, it’s about stallweezy not understanding CASS? or them being afraid of their student council?

10-14-2019, 10:31 PM

#822

Paid2fly

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: May 2009

Posts: 2,035

Quote:

Originally Posted by Not You

For when there is no announcement on or before Friday, possible new usernames for Week: NextWeek, LastWeek, TwoWeeksfromNow. We love you, Week!

How about just sticking with "WEAK"(or WEAK sauce)?

10-15-2019, 06:28 AM

#823

Battlinbear

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Feb 2010

Position: 2 Fan **** Can

Posts: 153

Quote:

Originally Posted by VIRotate

I vote on LastWeek.

Last Week Tonight. With....

10-15-2019, 12:59 PM

#824

buddies8

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Aug 2005

Posts: 3,707

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlyingKat

Negative. The whole reason Republic had to go with the multiple certificate kabuki dance was because the APA fined Chautauqua something like 6 million dollars for having 170s on their certificate until Republic could aquire Shuttle and park the Saabs and put 170s there. Old US Airways scope didn't apply to anything flown outside of Airways which was why the 190s were put on the old Republic Certificate.

That was then now all you need is a separate certificate owned by same company and no fowl.
If a regional airline wanted to they can take it to court and they would win.

10-15-2019, 01:51 PM

#825

Baradium

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Dec 2006

Position: 737 FO

Posts: 2,370

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddies8

That was then now all you need is a separate certificate owned by same company and no fowl.
If a regional airline wanted to they can take it to court and they would win.

I'm interested in the case law to show this. Noncompete clauses are common in contracts and that's all this amounts to.

10-15-2019, 02:56 PM

#826

RemiDenton

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Jul 2016

Posts: 240

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddies8

That was then now all you need is a separate certificate owned by same company and no fowl.

If a regional airline wanted to they can take it to court and they would win.

ADA4CCE6-0CA6-4E11-8621-901A035D279C-37899-000008A206DFDAEC.JPG

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

10-15-2019, 03:11 PM

#827

BobbyLeeSwagger

Moderator

Joined APC: Sep 2017

Position: MEC Chairman, Snack Basket Committee

Posts: 3,199

10-15-2019, 07:22 PM

#828

buddies8

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Aug 2005

Posts: 3,707

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baradium

I'm interested in the case law to show this. Noncompete clauses are common in contracts and that's all this amounts to.

First, in the 80's apa sued in federal court over aa violation on scope, result ruling was scope is only good in the confines of the u.s. and applies to only u.s. carriers.
Fast forward to aa bankruptcy, apa gave up that restriction, a regional max of 76 seats was removed and can fly a 747 if they wish on same certificate.

10-16-2019, 10:42 AM

#829

Baradium

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Dec 2006

Position: 737 FO

Posts: 2,370

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddies8

So you're saying the ruling says scope is valid (but at the same time saying every carrier's international scope isn't) and that AA doesn't have a size limit for their regional partners other operated aircraft but everyone else does?