Search

Notices
Compass Airlines Regional Airline

Losing Delta and New Opportunities

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2019, 04:05 PM
  #811  
Gets Weekends Off
 
VIRotate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,401
Default

Originally Posted by Bike Handles
Should be interesting to watch this play out. They're fighting over an uncomfortable fold-down "chair" placed in between two human beings flying at .66 and we are over here meme-ing our hearts out in hopes of getting an announcement this week.
Haha ain’t this the truth! Even though we may be out of a job soon, we are still having a good time. Meme-ing until the we’ve slipped below the water line! Meanwhile there is a fight over JS priority. Which I am on the side with UA. Exclusive feed, WO, whatever you want to call it should have priority. That’s how it is at Delta at least. I’ve never had a problem. If I’m listed on a DL flight and a 9E pilot comes up and says “sorry man”. Hey no problem. That’s just how it goes. That’s jumpseating for ya.
VIRotate is offline  
Old 10-14-2019, 04:10 PM
  #812  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingKat
The question was about UA/AA not Delta. However when ACA/Independence Air acquired the 319s Delta forced them exit the Delta Connection program (and got stuck with the Dojet leases), however ACA management at the time said they could have kept the Delta and UA flying if they had used the old AC Jet certificate for the 319s. They didn't do it because they said it wasn't worth the cost of running multiple certificates which is very expensive due to all the duplication involved. It would be pretty hard to enforce any kind of scope on a holding company because of the shell games these management teams play and they are very good at it.
A few things here. First, I am familiar with the Delta requirement and so I used it as an example. Rather than say United doesn't require that, you come back with some weak excuse that it's not about Delta and then a further excuse that it's "not enforceable" because you think holding companies can't have requirements placed on them for some reason. Second, management saying they just didn't want to bother keeping the Delta flying doesn't prove that they could have kept it.

The scope specifically addresses holding companies. It's not like ownership is that secretive in airlines. It's also not hard to enforce because the scope is a requirement placed on Delta.

Originally Posted by VIRotate
Starter pack got me! ��

So if we get UA flying, we aren’t joining The Great Jumpseat War of 2019 right?

I don’t even understand the big deal. This is the same thing Delta does more or less and they both fly for Delta.

1. DL mainline
2. 9E (“exclusive feed or whatever they say”
3. Other DCI carriers
4. OAL

I keep seeing guys talk about if it’s a DCI carrier, DL mainline and other DCI carrier are TOC priority. In our FOM, at least what I saved a few months ago, DL still has priority over the DCI carrier. Not TOC.
That priority list you are using seems to still be the wholly owned one and it shouldn't be the case anymore. Furthermore, in a given priority list on Delta and almost every other airline, you are time of check-in with other people in your priority. United is trying to force the other carriers to use DOH in each priority list which is a lot more than just reordering the priority list and makes it a lot different than what Delta has.

For Delta:

DAL mainline
9E
DCI
OAL


For 9E:
9E
DAL mainline
DCI
OAL

For DCI:
That carrier's pilots
non carrier DCI/DAL
OAL

A substantial difference here is that it is time of check-in in every priority step. Delta pilots also don't have any priority they don't reciprocate in kind with the other carrier with the exception that apparently your FOM doesn't have the expected order.
Baradium is offline  
Old 10-14-2019, 04:26 PM
  #813  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RemiDenton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 240
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium
BLAH BLAH BLAH doesn't have the expected order.

I think it’s fair to say this was a step towards the OO boards. We’re gonna need a meme mocking Week or OO before we let this boring chat continue.

Side note the real humor is the OO folks in the UAL boards


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RemiDenton is offline  
Old 10-14-2019, 05:41 PM
  #814  
Gets Weekends Off
 
VIRotate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,401
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium
A few things here. First, I am familiar with the Delta requirement and so I used it as an example. Rather than say United doesn't require that, you come back with some weak excuse that it's not about Delta and then a further excuse that it's "not enforceable" because you think holding companies can't have requirements placed on them for some reason. Second, management saying they just didn't want to bother keeping the Delta flying doesn't prove that they could have kept it.

The scope specifically addresses holding companies. It's not like ownership is that secretive in airlines. It's also not hard to enforce because the scope is a requirement placed on Delta.



That priority list you are using seems to still be the wholly owned one and it shouldn't be the case anymore. Furthermore, in a given priority list on Delta and almost every other airline, you are time of check-in with other people in your priority. United is trying to force the other carriers to use DOH in each priority list which is a lot more than just reordering the priority list and makes it a lot different than what Delta has.

For Delta:

DAL mainline
9E
DCI
OAL


For 9E:
9E
DAL mainline
DCI
OAL

For DCI:
That carrier's pilots
non carrier DCI/DAL
OAL

A substantial difference here is that it is time of check-in in every priority step. Delta pilots also don't have any priority they don't reciprocate in kind with the other carrier with the exception that apparently your FOM doesn't have the expected order.
IMO that doesn’t sound worth fighting over, creating a JS war, and jeopardize future hiring but that’s just me. If I was at OO, I would let any UA/XJT/etc pilot on my JS. The whole certificate action thing is laughable.
VIRotate is offline  
Old 10-14-2019, 06:52 PM
  #815  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 196
Default

I have a bunch of friends at OO, and none of them want to deny anyone a jumpseat. They do feel that they are being threatened by SAPA to join a fight that they don’t want to fight, and there’s a polarization of opinion between the lifers and non-lifers.
Dixie320 is offline  
Old 10-14-2019, 07:32 PM
  #816  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 516
Default

Originally Posted by Dixie320
I have a bunch of friends at OO, and none of them want to deny anyone a jumpseat. They do feel that they are being threatened by SAPA to join a fight that they don’t want to fight, and there’s a polarization of opinion between the lifers and non-lifers.
OO has non-lifers?
week is offline  
Old 10-14-2019, 08:26 PM
  #817  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 10
Default

For when there is no announcement on or before Friday, possible new usernames for Week: NextWeek, LastWeek, TwoWeeksfromNow. We love you, Week!
Not You is offline  
Old 10-14-2019, 08:29 PM
  #818  
Gets Weekends Off
 
VIRotate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,401
Default

Originally Posted by Not You
For when there is no announcement on or before Friday, possible new usernames for Week: NextWeek, LastWeek, TwoWeeksfromNow. We love you, Week!
I vote on LastWeek.
VIRotate is offline  
Old 10-14-2019, 08:57 PM
  #819  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 10
Default

Originally Posted by VIRotate
I vote on LastWeek.
Another: WeekEnd
Not You is offline  
Old 10-14-2019, 09:20 PM
  #820  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RemiDenton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 240
Default Losing Delta and New Opportunities

Originally Posted by Dixie320
I have a bunch of friends at OO, and none of them want to deny anyone a jumpseat. They do feel that they are being threatened by SAPA to join a fight that they don’t want to fight, and there’s a polarization of opinion between the lifers and non-lifers.


But the JS war isn’t about OO vs UAL dick measuring (at least both ways). It’s about one taking advantage of the system and the other evening the playing field. The fact that so many on the message boards don’t get that, blows my mind.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RemiDenton is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices