CommutAir Rumors and Info
06-05-2017, 04:08 AM
#4021
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
I'll ask once more. Show me in your contract where YOU took back scope. Show me how YOU and your union managed to "take back" those cities. Also, I'm pretty sure there are still DHC-8s flying into SYR and between UAL hubs.
I'm afraid to imagine how your posts will look after retirement if you have this much time to troll regional boards while you're employed.
I'm afraid to imagine how your posts will look after retirement if you have this much time to troll regional boards while you're employed.
We establish new limits, return mainline service to stations that hadn't seen mainline service since 9/11 and you still complain we haven't done enough? Those flights are all mainline jobs that wouldn't have been created if we didn't have limits.
06-05-2017, 04:43 AM
#4022
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 296
You want to see our contract...then get the job. We now have hard limits on large RJ's in our contract, along with other limits. The 50 seater is dying a cost death. And that DHC-8 to SYR is probably delayed or canceled for crew or maintenance.
We establish new limits, return mainline service to stations that hadn't seen mainline service since 9/11 and you still complain we haven't done enough?
We establish new limits, return mainline service to stations that hadn't seen mainline service since 9/11 and you still complain we haven't done enough?
06-05-2017, 05:41 AM
#4024
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 296
Amusement. Call him on his BS, then watch him deflect and dodge the questions he's too proud to admit he can't answer. He gets a little more creative each time. I can't tell if he's a troll, or just angry and confused.
06-05-2017, 06:47 AM
#4025
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: EMB 145 FO
Posts: 425
Yes I am younger than you. So sorry about that.
Now where do I even begin? No, CommutAir did not take consessions to acquire new airplanes. Actually, we signed in improvements to our contract. It still sucks, but it got better. How in your little mind does that equate to selling out? Please explain.
Yes you guys are finally holding the line on scope after you and your friends already sold the industry out. You are not taking back regional cities. Show me where in your contract you have successfully taken back scope and have taken back "many regional cities".
Now where do I even begin? No, CommutAir did not take consessions to acquire new airplanes. Actually, we signed in improvements to our contract. It still sucks, but it got better. How in your little mind does that equate to selling out? Please explain.
Yes you guys are finally holding the line on scope after you and your friends already sold the industry out. You are not taking back regional cities. Show me where in your contract you have successfully taken back scope and have taken back "many regional cities".
Did you guys have a bad break up?
06-05-2017, 07:07 AM
#4026
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 296
06-05-2017, 10:39 AM
#4027
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
So how do you explain the return of mainline jets to markets that were given to RJ's after 9/11? Does the UA pilots scope clause have nothing to do with the changes? If we had unlimited jets at greater than 50 seats at UAX I highly suspect these markets would have E170's and CR7 or 9's if we had not altered our scope language.
Lets hope UA has learned its lesson with using the lowest bidder of commutair. In fact commutair is so bad they were willing to bring back ARW, flying some of the oldest CRJ's for a more reliable operation than attempting to expand the commutair experiment.
06-05-2017, 11:07 AM
#4028
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Admiral
Posts: 729
I will do your homework for you on this one...UA1500 ORD-SYR 08JUN Dep 1347 Arr 1637 Equipment: A320...Must be an imaginary flight since you don't seem to be an believer.
So how do you explain the return of mainline jets to markets that were given to RJ's after 9/11? Does the UA pilots scope clause have nothing to do with the changes? If we had unlimited jets at greater than 50 seats at UAX I highly suspect these markets would have E170's and CR7 or 9's if we had not altered our scope language.
Lets hope UA has learned its lesson with using the lowest bidder of commutair. In fact commutair is so bad they were willing to bring back ARW, flying some of the oldest CRJ's for a more reliable operation than attempting to expand the commutair experiment.
So how do you explain the return of mainline jets to markets that were given to RJ's after 9/11? Does the UA pilots scope clause have nothing to do with the changes? If we had unlimited jets at greater than 50 seats at UAX I highly suspect these markets would have E170's and CR7 or 9's if we had not altered our scope language.
Lets hope UA has learned its lesson with using the lowest bidder of commutair. In fact commutair is so bad they were willing to bring back ARW, flying some of the oldest CRJ's for a more reliable operation than attempting to expand the commutair experiment.
06-05-2017, 11:46 AM
#4029
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 296
I will do your homework for you on this one...UA1500 ORD-SYR 08JUN Dep 1347 Arr 1637 Equipment: A320...Must be an imaginary flight since you don't seem to be an believer.
So how do you explain the return of mainline jets to markets that were given to RJ's after 9/11? Does the UA pilots scope clause have nothing to do with the changes?
So how do you explain the return of mainline jets to markets that were given to RJ's after 9/11? Does the UA pilots scope clause have nothing to do with the changes?
06-05-2017, 12:53 PM
#4030
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 336
How do I explain it? It's summer. More people are flying, so you need more seats. That explanation is just as good as yours. You obviously don't have the insider info you claim to have. As long as there are 37 seat dash 8s flying between UAL hubs, you haven't done jack with your scope. I expect better results from you next month. Good luck, we are rooting for you.
Maybe if the management at mainline wasn't trying to fix their own mess, they might have more time to fix their regionals.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
