hslightnin

He's busy figuring how much more he can get when they ask to sell out more scope for the MRJ.

No Lies

I must have missed it. How many emergency landings occurred? And when? (not UA BTW those are in the news.)

Lambourne

The children of the magenta line should be given a history lesson in scope.

Lad, progress was made while you were trying to learn how to buckle a seat belt.

How about your group selling out the rest of the regional pilots with sub standard pay and working conditions just to get your hands on a jet and steal the contracts services from other pilots. Guess it doesn't bother you that you and your lot have lowered the bar.

I'm quiet happy with our contract and scope provisions. We are taking back many regional cities and holding the line on scope.

What have you people done to make the industry better?

turboprop87

Ooohhhkky.

Sent from my ZTE A2017U using Tapatalk

dhc8

When we got our contract, it was the highest first year pay rate of any regional. No one voted for any concessionary contract to receive jets in return. We had the best commuter policy with hotel rooms before anyone else. So please don't come here and try to dump on the pilot group like we're PSA or something.

Hobbit64

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll

Cirrusly

Guys you have to stop feeding Lambourne...there's a wonderful ignore option everyone should take advantage of. People are saying he touches himself while trolling our thread...pretty sick stuff

https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/f...l&titlesonly=0

How to add to your ignore list ^

Otterbox

Sounds like most of the regionals exist today because legacy pilots were willing to sacrifice the greater good of the pilot industry to save their own financial lives. I wouldn't be so critical of regional pilots who are left picking up the pieces of the hand the generation of older legacy pilots dealt... the greatest progress we've seen in the industry happened in the last few years and that's only because age 65 was finally enacted and that generation is finally leaving the industry after looking after their own financial interests and caused 5 years of stagnation and suppressed wages.

If legacy pilots had a bit more of a backbone and held the line on scope when they needed to, and didn't Lobby for age 65, there would be a lot more pilots ar mainline carriers today... and industry would have started recovering years sooner than it did.

Lambourne

If scope had been retained to scope out RJ's (which I was a supporter of when the debate arose in 1997) most of you flying RJ's today still would not be major airline pilots today.

The majority of the pilots at Commutair weren't in the industry or even out of high school when the scope debate took place in the 90's. Most if not all have walked into a situation you should have known about beforehand. Don't blame legacy pilots for your poor decision making.

Did you need a legacy pilot to do your research for you? Seems you can't seem to take care of yourself or accept any responsibility for where you are in life. Maybe that is why many of you fail the personality test?

No Lies

Too bad they didn't have that personality test when you were hired. This thread would look totally different without you.

AND how many emergency landings did you say? Just can't answer that one yet, can you?