Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
a look at stagnant wages in the us >

a look at stagnant wages in the us

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

a look at stagnant wages in the us

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-2014, 05:22 PM
  #41  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by StarClipper

Some of my best teachers ... are all aliens.

That would explain your illiteracy.






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 10-09-2014, 05:24 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FoxHunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 980
Default

Originally Posted by MaydayMark
Faux Hunter ... I'm confused? To the best of my knowledge, we're not currently in CEO Pay Negotiations. To be honest I really don't care how much he makes. He works hard, has almost certainly put in VERY long days and invested a significant portion of his personal wealth. He deserves to be paid a good (very good!) salary.

We're in pilot pay negotiations. We deserve to be paid a good (very good!) salary too. We shouldn't have to beg or drag negotiations on for years!*?


Just trying to tell you where the money has to go. PC will soon retire and needs a great send off. Even if you get the best you will be 30% behind the pay and retirement of the 1960s and 70s. You voted in a national union to replace the local one. How is that working out? Yes, you deserve a lot more than you're receiving. It is not just FedEx that is screwed up, it is the whole system. BTW that $260,000 FAI from 1998 should be $379,395.83 today according to the CPI calculator.
FoxHunter is offline  
Old 10-09-2014, 06:05 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
Posts: 1,162
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
You are just weird and stupid. My point is that all job growth in the last 15 years has gone to aliens and you some gather that my point is "Are you suggesting that companies don't hire Aliens, legal or illegal?"

Let me type really slow for you and then you can get back to surfing porn. Aliens; legal and illegal, work cheaper than native Americans. Therefore if aliens take all of the new jobs created then wages will be stagnant. See that is the theme we are discussing. I have nothing against legal aliens. Line jumping illegal aliens however should not be allowed to work and drive down the wages for entry level jobs. There is a reason you couldnt get hired a McDonalds. Illegals work cheaper and dont smoke dope in the bathroom on their break.

So now which is it, you want to work at Fedex or you dont want to work at Fedex? You have claimed both in the last 2 months.

Who was that last poser that used to hang out here, I wonder where he went.
I never said I didn't want to work for FedEX, the point I was making was if I don't get hired there, I'm comfortable at my current job. It's not a bad place. As for you alien comments, you came accross like it was personal to you.
StarClipper is offline  
Old 10-09-2014, 06:08 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 173
Default

This is clearly a very complicated issue and is not the fault of any one political party. There are many contributing factors but the U.S. being forced into a global economy where we are faced with competing with $1 per hour labor whilst trying to somehow maintain our previous quality of life would be the main issue.

It's hilarious to me when guys try to accuse people "nowadays" of being lazy welfare queens who just want free iPhones and big screen TVs. Do those of you who blame laziness think this is a new phenomenon? People today are motivated by the same factors that our parents and grandparents were. Our economy sucks and although many of you want to take the easy way out and blame the current president, the fact is the problem is much more complicated than that. Our current welfare system has been around since the 1930's. 99% of people want to work. The sad thing is that capitalism has failed to provide a profitable alternative to government assistance.

Consider this for a second. What would most of you who point the finger at the "moochers" do if you were furloughed? Would you collect unemployment until you were able to find a job where you could afford your mortgage and car payment or would you opt out of government assistance and take a minimum wage job at McDonalds?
WelcomeToBen is offline  
Old 10-09-2014, 06:08 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
Posts: 1,162
Default

[QUOTE=TonyC;1743460]That would explain your illiteracy.




Soary Profesar I deed knot no eat wuz gramer clas
StarClipper is offline  
Old 10-09-2014, 06:37 PM
  #46  
Part Time Employee
 
MaxKts's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Default

Originally Posted by WelcomeToBen
This is clearly a very complicated issue and is not the fault of any one political party. There are many contributing factors but the U.S. being forced into a global economy where we are faced with competing with $1 per hour labor whilst trying to somehow maintain our previous quality of life would be the main issue.

It's hilarious to me when guys try to accuse people "nowadays" of being lazy welfare queens who just want free iPhones and big screen TVs. Do those of you who blame laziness think this is a new phenomenon? People today are motivated by the same factors that our parents and grandparents were. Our economy sucks and although many of you want to take the easy way out and blame the current president, the fact is the problem is much more complicated than that. Our current welfare system has been around since the 1930's. 99% of people want to work. The sad thing is that capitalism has failed to provide a profitable alternative to government assistance.

Consider this for a second. What would most of you who point the finger at the "moochers" do if you were furloughed? Would you collect unemployment until you were able to find a job where you could afford your mortgage and car payment or would you opt out of government assistance and take a minimum wage job at McDonalds?
Where I live almost every business has a help wanted sign in the window. I have worked minimum wage jobs in the past. Didn't stay at min wage very long. I have worked with those that just want enough for beer on the weekend! They stayed at the min. If you show your boss you are worth more you usually will get more. If you just want to collect a paycheck - your boss will do that but it will remain at the minimum he is s required to pay you! Show up for work, be there on time, show some motivation and I bet you will get more than you started at fairly quickly!
MaxKts is offline  
Old 10-09-2014, 06:58 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 173
Default

Originally Posted by MaxKts
Where I live almost every business has a help wanted sign in the window. I have worked minimum wage jobs in the past. Didn't stay at min wage very long. I have worked with those that just want enough for beer on the weekend! They stayed at the min. If you show your boss you are worth more you usually will get more. If you just want to collect a paycheck - your boss will do that but it will remain at the minimum he is s required to pay you! Show up for work, be there on time, show some motivation and I bet you will get more than you started at fairly quickly!
This is an extreme oversimplification of our current environment. Work hard and you'll succeed? It's that simple? C'mon. The fact is that economic mobility in this country has dropped off a cliff. Every major corporation here has shipped manufacturing jobs overseas because we've decided that we value the shareholder over the blue collar worker. I just think it's ridiculous that the welfare system and "lazy people" get blamed for our current situation. As if welfare and "lazy people" just suddenly appeared out of nowhere and took over our country. Why more blame isn't shifted toward corporate culture and current business ethics is beyond me.
WelcomeToBen is offline  
Old 10-09-2014, 08:00 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,752
Default

Aliens?

John Carr is offline  
Old 10-09-2014, 08:46 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by WelcomeToBen
This is clearly a very complicated issue and is not the fault of any one political party. There are many contributing factors but the U.S. being forced into a global economy where we are faced with competing with $1 per hour labor whilst trying to somehow maintain our previous quality of life would be the main issue.

It's hilarious to me when guys try to accuse people "nowadays" of being lazy welfare queens who just want free iPhones and big screen TVs. Do those of you who blame laziness think this is a new phenomenon? People today are motivated by the same factors that our parents and grandparents were. Our economy sucks and although many of you want to take the easy way out and blame the current president, the fact is the problem is much more complicated than that. Our current welfare system has been around since the 1930's. 99% of people want to work. The sad thing is that capitalism has failed to provide a profitable alternative to government assistance.

Consider this for a second. What would most of you who point the finger at the "moochers" do if you were furloughed? Would you collect unemployment until you were able to find a job where you could afford your mortgage and car payment or would you opt out of government assistance and take a minimum wage job at McDonalds?
The current welfare system has not been around since the 1930s. There has been government aid since the 1930s but it has gotten more generous and less restrictive since it began. And attitude about accepting a hand out have changed from embarrassment to entitlement. You bet your --- I would work minimum wage. I would also collect every nickel I could from unemployment, I paid for it.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 10-09-2014, 09:11 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 173
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
The current welfare system has not been around since the 1930s. There has been government aid since the 1930s but it has gotten more generous and less restrictive since it began. And attitude about accepting a hand out have changed from embarrassment to entitlement. You bet your --- I would work minimum wage. I would also collect every nickel I could from unemployment, I paid for it.
Once again.. oversimplification of an extremely complicated issue. Welfare has been bolstered as well as cut (welfare reform under Clinton in the '90's) over the years. The major factor that has affected our economy here in the U.S. is the fact that we now have to compete with $1 per hour labor overseas. This was not a factor 30 or 40 years ago. We fought long and hard to establish a robust middle class in this country only to have it undercut by the globalization of our economy. It's not the "immigrants" fault. We're all immigrants in this country. We can sit here and pretend that a lot of lazy immigrants crossed the border and convinced our politicians to give them government handouts but that is clearly not the case.

Entitlement.. seriously. If I hear that word one more time I think my head might explode. I'm sure that Rush and Sean and Bill are all super pumped that their word of the decade has permeated the conscious of the dwindling white upper middle class and somehow become relevant.

Yes, welfare has experienced some changes over the years. So has corporate culture and the way we value the shareholder. I would argue that the latter has had a much more detrimental effect on our current situation. Why in this country do we punish the weak and reward the as*holes? I just don't get it.
WelcomeToBen is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nerd2009
Major
2
02-16-2012 05:47 AM
Walkeraviator
Flight Schools and Training
29
07-25-2011 07:51 PM
SourGrapes
Major
50
03-08-2010 05:19 PM
Joachim
Regional
104
09-27-2008 08:37 PM
SkyHigh
Hangar Talk
10
03-13-2008 12:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices