Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX Charters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2014, 05:54 AM
  #421  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by DoodyOfficer
I was also very impressed, however I have a different take on the who and why. The union should be holding individuals to the publish code of ethics without some sort of vision,direction, or rules an organization will cease to exist. The company is only responsible if there is some sort of illegal activities unless they see some sort of benefit on correcting the wrong. It's obvious that the company sees this as an issue within the crew force and it's going to leverage it for future negotiations. I've heard SS talk about the gorilla in the room well ALPA created a gorilla. ALPA should be ashamed of themselves.
So you and BusDrivr are very impressed. At what? That a blog entry concerning Charters came out? Are your feelings being recognized?

I'm not so easily impressed. The claim is a 2+ year investigation is in progress but has gone nowhere. I don't think their heart is in it.

I can't believe some of the passionate, but confused, posters. It's hard to separate the wheat from the chaff in this thread.

Do you guys post because the guys on the crew bus just don't understand your point? Well we don't either.
Gunter is offline  
Old 03-06-2014, 05:56 AM
  #422  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r
Lag ,You are technically correct, But they(Management) can get records of those alleged calls, to include txt messages, emails and the lot if they want to…. and have proven that the will in the past.
That's only if you file an expense report for a taxi you didn't take.

For charters they'll have another meeting before they consider the pros and cons of take further action.
Gunter is offline  
Old 03-06-2014, 06:50 AM
  #423  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,419
Default

Originally Posted by Full pull
So BM reads APC.
Shouldn't be a shocker, nor should you be amazed that mgt probably has a pretty good idea of who's who on APC
kronan is offline  
Old 03-06-2014, 06:54 AM
  #424  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,535
Default

Originally Posted by skeebo2
Since we know mgmt is reading this I'd like to help them.
Take a look at two airbus captains ( husband and wife ) neither a check airman or instructor. They flew from Anchorage to Asia. No F/O.

I think they parked in the out and back lot too.
Part 91 Flight Test if they are who I think they are.
MX727 is offline  
Old 03-06-2014, 08:01 AM
  #425  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 114
Default

Why not treat charters the same as volunteer?
When times are good and people are on the volunteer list, one of the criteria for being assigned a trip is the amount of volunteer flying done in a defined preceding time frame.
How difficult would it be to have the same system in place for charters?
If you fly a charter you go to the bottom of the list and everyone who submits to pick up the next available charter is eligible to be assigned the trip before
you.

Seems like an easy fix to me. However I'm sure it's not that simple.
Purpletailed10 is offline  
Old 03-06-2014, 08:02 AM
  #426  
New Hire
 
maddog_fo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 9
Default

There is a quite simple fix to most of the problem with the charter wh*res, besides putting the rat bast*rds on a deserted island. They need to build the charter trips into bidpack lines. I talked to a charter rep and he said the vast majority of charter trips are known months in advance. There will be an occasional pop up charter that can't be put into the bidpack that the wh*res can fight over. Please write your SIG and block reps and suggest this. The company can't fix this, but we can!
maddog_fo is offline  
Old 03-06-2014, 08:08 AM
  #427  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Kooky's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: MD
Posts: 124
Default

Fix all of this by making all the charters out of ANC then you really cut off any chance of the privileged getting a crack at them : )
Kooky is offline  
Old 03-06-2014, 11:38 AM
  #428  
Slainge Var'
 
AerisArmis's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Zeppelin Tail Gunner
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by maddog_fo
There is a quite simple fix to most of the problem with the charter wh*res, besides putting the rat bast*rds on a deserted island. They need to build the charter trips into bidpack lines. I talked to a charter rep and he said the vast majority of charter trips are known months in advance. There will be an occasional pop up charter that can't be put into the bidpack that the wh*res can fight over. Please write your SIG and block reps and suggest this. The company can't fix this, but we can!
I think this is what all the hubbub is about. I've flown many charters over the years that were built into a normal line. Stansted-Akrotiri Cyprus, Chitose-Melborne, Anchorage-Kagoshima, Rota-Sigonella-Bahrain and back are some examples. None were DDHs. Maybe the company assigns a value on whether or not the charter is likely to be canceled or delayed.......and if it is, it's withheld from the bid pack. If any of the above was cancelled, I'd have had a heck of a long layover somewhere and we know the company hates synthetic time. Besides, what would I have done for 6 days in Subic?
AerisArmis is offline  
Old 03-06-2014, 11:49 AM
  #429  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Default

Really, skeebo2? Are you talking about the couple where one is now retired and the other in flight test, doing a perfectly legal flight... years ago? Give me a break.
busdriver12 is offline  
Old 03-06-2014, 12:10 PM
  #430  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 777 Captain in Training
Posts: 1,457
Default

Originally Posted by busdriver12
Really, skeebo2? Are you talking about the couple where one is now retired and the other in flight test, doing a perfectly legal flight... years ago? Give me a break.
Skeebo2
They are also part 91 and carry no freight.
HIFLYR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoro
Cargo
32
07-26-2012 06:32 AM
vagabond
Cargo
83
07-14-2010 07:27 AM
Ernst
Cargo
148
07-08-2010 06:04 PM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Cargo
61
03-19-2009 08:40 AM
CloudSailor
Cargo
18
05-19-2008 10:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices