Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
WSJ article on UPS BHM crash >

WSJ article on UPS BHM crash

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

WSJ article on UPS BHM crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2013, 07:31 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JustAMushroom's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Capt
Posts: 611
Default

Originally Posted by Rocket Bob
From what I understand, this schedule would have been compliant with the new rest rules. Pretty sure this is what UPS will have to say about the fatigue issue.
The Airline/Cargo industry pushes for these rules then hides behind the FAA when there's an accident. Saying "we comply with the FAA rules" is just lawyer speak for "we do what we want"
JustAMushroom is offline  
Old 10-12-2013, 08:37 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: DC-8 756/767
Posts: 1,144
Default

Originally Posted by EasternATC
When was the crew's last flight prior to the accident? Or better, does anyone know the entire four-day line?
I believe the first night was 2 legs to RFD. Second night was RFD-PIA-SDF.....sit the sort then BHM.
UPSFO4LIFE is offline  
Old 10-12-2013, 08:45 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by L'il J.Seinfeld
Absolutely nothing uncommon with his delaying upgrade that long. That was a very poor assertion on the part of the reporter and akin to a hatchet job.
The reporter had some help.

"he had remained a co-pilot for about 19 years, an unusually long time, which people familiar with his training record attributed to difficulties during some simulator sessions."
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 10-12-2013, 08:54 AM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Bill Kilgore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: Huey Gunship
Posts: 64
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
The reporter had some help.

"he had remained a co-pilot for about 19 years, an unusually long time, which people familiar with his training record attributed to difficulties during some simulator sessions."
Seems like someone (UPS lawyer?) wants to do everything they can to place more blame on the crew. "He had difficulty in a couple sim sessions so he must be a bad pilot. Fatigue had nothing to do with it." They want to shift the narrative from fatigue to pilot competency. Sad and pathetic.
Bill Kilgore is offline  
Old 10-12-2013, 09:49 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,340
Default

Schedulers at my airline have always said, "But it is legal" when I try to adjust my showtime after waiting 2-3 hours for them to schedule a hotel room for an unscheduled 8 hour overnight.

Good thing that I don’t mind calling out fatigued, but someone on probation might not do that especially when they throw out the “But you are on probation” or “You will have to explain this to your CP” lines.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 10-12-2013, 10:17 AM
  #16  
Bourgeoisie
 
MEMFO4Ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 787 SO
Posts: 617
Default

Originally Posted by JustAMushroom
The Airline/Cargo industry pushes for these rules then hides behind the FAA when there's an accident. Saying "we comply with the FAA rules" is just lawyer speak for "we do what we want"
Golden Rule: Those with the gold make the rules.

Best regulatory agency money can buy.

MD11=MD10...
MEMFO4Ever is offline  
Old 10-12-2013, 11:21 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 350
Default

Originally Posted by UPSFO4LIFE
I believe the first night was 2 legs to RFD. Second night was RFD-PIA-SDF.....sit the sort then BHM.
Thanks, but I'm curious to learn how much rest they actually had. Anybody know?
EasternATC is offline  
Old 10-12-2013, 11:35 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: DC-8 756/767
Posts: 1,144
Default

Scheduled rest means nothing if they did not sleep enough during the day. It was probably scheduled as a 12-14 hour layover in RFD.
UPSFO4LIFE is offline  
Old 10-12-2013, 12:49 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 161
Default

Pilot error,,,plain & simple. It happens.1) If he was with the company 19 yrs. he was used to flying fatigued. 2) Where the hell is the FO in all this. And how come he let his Capt. fly him into the ground??

Just calling it like I see it.
Whaledriver101 is offline  
Old 10-12-2013, 01:04 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ForeverFO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 737
Default

Originally Posted by 756IAHFO
Yeah, but some of us pilots are way over conservative.

I fly with some captains that always add fuel no matter what, even when we don't need it.

In your case I see no problem landing at max weight, as long as it fits into the runway distance calculation and performance data, etc. Even if they take off 2000 lbs of fuel will that really matter if you come in ref+30 and float.....probably not.

It is all about flying the plane.
We weren't ferrying 2,000 lbs, we were ferrying 15,000+ regularly.

Have you done a number of night arrivals into Guatemala City in the rainy season? Maybe you have, and our opinions simply differ. That place can be scary.

Even when conditions are good, it's not an airport to mess with in any way due to the RWY itself, let alone the nasty terrain. And when there is moisture, even if there is no reported moisture, the runway, with decades of oil and rubber greased into the pavement, becomes very slick. Then you fall off the cliff.

It is stupid to ferry fuel into MGGT, IMO. Ferry the gas into other airports, but there are a handful like MGGT where it may be legal, but not smart.
ForeverFO is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TonyWilliams
Cargo
250
09-09-2010 04:31 PM
APM145
Regional
7
05-22-2009 04:01 PM
Pelican
Major
25
03-12-2009 10:14 AM
Soyathink
Cargo
45
03-04-2007 04:47 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-05-2005 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices