Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX Jumpseats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-13-2013, 07:20 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,419
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC

==================================================
1) HUMOROUS REPLY



That's great news! I'll be bringing my wife along on the next trip!






==================================================
1) SERIOUS REPLY




NO! Absolutely not!

2 reasons:


First, the Captain only has the authority to DENY flight deck access. In order for a person to be granted access to the flight deck, he must have permission from 3 (three) parties:
  • The FAA
  • The Certificate holder
  • The Pilot in Command
All three are required -- any one can deny. Without the permission of the FAA, it doesn't matter how the pilot in command feels or what the certificate holder wants -- access denied.

Second, .583 applies to supernumerary seats, those seats outside of the flight deck. By definition, no flight deck access is involved. The seats covered by this section are located aft of the Intruder Resistant Cockpit Door -- if such a door exists on the airplane. If no such door exists on the airplane, no such seats exist on the airplane, and no such passengers may ride.
.
I like the humorous one, and, if the company permitted it. Best I could tell it would be cool with the feds when traveling to\from places "not served by adequate regular passenger flights"....somewhat resembles Memphis IMO as Delta phases out.


So strange that 583 says the following "(e) The pilot in command may authorize a person covered by paragraph (a) of this section to be admitted to the crew compartment of the airplane."

Just me, but that means if they can ride in the back, totally okay to ride up front with your Okay.

And, as to the ramp check, I'd be very surprised if the inspector wouldn't allow you to leave the jet and access one of the company computer's to print out a copy of the FCIF\FOM re our POI's okay on this policy.
Well, actually, an AMT wouldn't be riding up front with you on Personal status....so, I'd be surprised if it happened to me.

To change the subject, kind of, Do you keep a logbook? If not, how do you answer an inspectors query as to whether or not you are current to operate? I know many people depend upon the electronic flight records the company maintains, but again, that would require access to a company computer to prove should the inspector doubt your veracity.
kronan is offline  
Old 06-13-2013, 07:42 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 767 Cap
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC
Actually, we did not.

We had GOC Specialists who happened to have Dispatcher Certificates.

.
So, you are stating that a Dispatcher's certificate was not a prerequisite to apply for the GOC Specialist position, because I know that at least for tha last ten years, that is wrong.


Originally Posted by TonyC
We've also had pilots without 4-year degrees, and pilots without ATPs.

.
We're not talking ancient history or special exceptions. We are talking the basic requirements posted on the PFC website, which as far back as I can remember said 4-year degree.
fdx727pilot is offline  
Old 06-13-2013, 09:07 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Walrus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Socket Drawer
Posts: 1,797
Default

Actually, what we are talking about is what the FAA requires. It was not a requirement at Fedex 3 years ago.

Fedex could require it's pilots to all have time on the space shuttle to get an interview, but it is not required by FAA regulations.
The Walrus is offline  
Old 06-13-2013, 12:55 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC


We've also had pilots without 4-year degrees, and pilots without ATPs.


.
I flew with an LCA that didn't have a College Degree ...
MaydayMark is offline  
Old 06-13-2013, 06:12 PM
  #85  
Banned
 
FlyerOnWall's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by Nightflyer
There is a maintenance guy that commutes from DFW.

I'd like to know how his priority compares to mine

He is on the jumpseat at least twice a week, and, since he knows his schedule before I know mine, he can book ahead of me.

What is my union doing about this?

Pilots should have priority for jumpseats over maintenance, or else why am I paying my 2%?
That's exactly the attitude that drives a wedge between the two groups.

The company offers the benefit (flight privilege) to those allowed by FAR's. We all have to live with the fact that there is limited seating.


Originally Posted by DoubleD
One of my concerns is that crewmembers and most of FDX work in secure work areas. Mechanics are required to have tool to do their job. Many of their tools would be prohibited for a crewmember to be in possession of while on FDX property. Especially at an outstation the cockpit jumpseating mechanic has access to his work station while waiting to board. While we're giving up our nail clippers the mechanics have access to prohibited items. One level of security?
What I find really bizarre is that mechanics have access to all the inner working of an aircraft on the ground, yet there are those that feel they could be a threat in flight. A mechanics job is to ensure airworthiness. 50% of all fatal aircraft accidents are blamed on pilot error, all other human error accounts for 7%, that's, ATC, aircraft loading, fueling and maintenance errors, combined. And pilots are afraid of mechanics? I think mechanics have way more right to be afraid of pilots.

I wouldn't blame anyone that would rather pay for a seat on commercial than ride with some of you arrogant sons...
FlyerOnWall is offline  
Old 06-13-2013, 06:17 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 777 Captain in Training
Posts: 1,457
Default

[QUOTE=fdx727pilot;1427553]So, you are stating that a Dispatcher's certificate was not a prerequisite to apply for the GOC Specialist position, because I know that at least for tha last ten years, that is wrong.

I will the requirement to have a dispatchers licenses was not a requirement years ago nor were the box GOC guys required to ever get one. That changed around 10 to 15 years ago but one could still be hired without a license but FedEx would train and have you tested to obtain one.
HIFLYR is offline  
Old 06-13-2013, 07:09 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerOnWall
That's exactly the attitude that drives a wedge between the two groups.

The company offers the benefit (flight privilege) to those allowed by FAR's. We all have to live with the fact that there is limited seating.




What I find really bizarre is that mechanics have access to all the inner working of an aircraft on the ground, yet there are those that feel they could be a threat in flight. A mechanics job is to ensure airworthiness. 50% of all fatal aircraft accidents are blamed on pilot error, all other human error accounts for 7%, that's, ATC, aircraft loading, fueling and maintenance errors, combined. And pilots are afraid of mechanics? I think mechanics have way more right to be afraid of pilots.

I wouldn't blame anyone that would rather pay for a seat on commercial than ride with some of you arrogant sons...
Yes, because when you "ride on commercial"...It's not flown by pilots. Let alone, arrogant ones.
Busboy is offline  
Old 06-13-2013, 07:12 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Stratosphere's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Bent Over
Posts: 230
Default

[QUOTE=HIFLYR;1427950]
Originally Posted by fdx727pilot
So, you are stating that a Dispatcher's certificate was not a prerequisite to apply for the GOC Specialist position, because I know that at least for tha last ten years, that is wrong.

I will the requirement to have a dispatchers licenses was not a requirement years ago nor were the box GOC guys required to ever get one. That changed around 10 to 15 years ago but one could still be hired without a license but FedEx would train and have you tested to obtain one.
Current internal job posted for GOC have to have your dispatch cert with in 90 days if you don't have one..Although I don't think they entertain anyone without the cert.. But hey you can get it in 5 to 6 weeks
Stratosphere is offline  
Old 06-13-2013, 09:30 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MEM MD-11 Capt
Posts: 175
Default

I wouldn't blame anyone that would rather pay for a seat on commercial than ride with some of you arrogant sons...[/QUOTE]

FedEx is a commercial airline, we operate aircraft for the purpose of generating revenue. I get tired of explaining this to non-aviators.
ol'tigerguy is offline  
Old 06-13-2013, 09:49 PM
  #90  
Part Time Employee
 
MaxKts's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerOnWall
....What I find really bizarre is that mechanics have access to all the inner working of an aircraft on the ground, yet there are those that feel they could be a threat in flight....
Has anyone on here stated that they feel threatened by having a mechanic on board? No one is afraid of the mechanics! What they are afraid of is the company's latest interpretation of the rules and when the FAA decides the company made a mistake - how that may effect their career!


Originally Posted by FlyerOnWall
I wouldn't blame anyone that would rather pay for a seat on commercial than ride with some of you arrogant sons...
Uhh - Are you saying we have a monopoly on arrogance
MaxKts is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoro
Cargo
32
07-26-2012 06:32 AM
vagabond
Cargo
83
07-14-2010 07:27 AM
Ernst
Cargo
148
07-08-2010 06:04 PM
Balut
Cargo
1
09-29-2008 06:25 AM
Purple Nugget
Cargo
11
09-26-2008 02:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices