Huge Posting Fedex
#31
3 % a year, improvements to FDA, and ASAP.
How much do you think ASAP is worth to the crew of the Denver tailstrike? I suspect they are glad its in place, and the value to them is priceless.
For those who say we were getting that anyway, I point out EFBs in every jet, ipad for all pilots, and FAA flight time/duty time improvements were all on the calendar or were proposed too...and we still do not have them. The pragmatic approach may have just saved some careers. Anyone who has used ASAP in the last 2 years and avoided enforcement action will probably say they got a bit more than just a 3% raise....
How much do you think ASAP is worth to the crew of the Denver tailstrike? I suspect they are glad its in place, and the value to them is priceless.
For those who say we were getting that anyway, I point out EFBs in every jet, ipad for all pilots, and FAA flight time/duty time improvements were all on the calendar or were proposed too...and we still do not have them. The pragmatic approach may have just saved some careers. Anyone who has used ASAP in the last 2 years and avoided enforcement action will probably say they got a bit more than just a 3% raise....
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: MD-11
Posts: 395
3 % a year, improvements to FDA, and ASAP.
How much do you think ASAP is worth to the crew of the Denver tailstrike? I suspect they are glad its in place, and the value to them is priceless.
For those who say we were getting that anyway, I point out EFBs in every jet, ipad for all pilots, and FAA flight time/duty time improvements were all on the calendar or were proposed too...and we still do not have them. The pragmatic approach may have just saved some careers. Anyone who has used ASAP in the last 2 years and avoided enforcement action will probably say they got a bit more than just a 3% raise....
How much do you think ASAP is worth to the crew of the Denver tailstrike? I suspect they are glad its in place, and the value to them is priceless.
For those who say we were getting that anyway, I point out EFBs in every jet, ipad for all pilots, and FAA flight time/duty time improvements were all on the calendar or were proposed too...and we still do not have them. The pragmatic approach may have just saved some careers. Anyone who has used ASAP in the last 2 years and avoided enforcement action will probably say they got a bit more than just a 3% raise....
ASAP is a safety program that has been instituted at many airlines prior to FedEx outside of negotiations for monetary items. If it was a quid pro quo here, then shame on you guys for trading away fair compensation for a safety program that should have been negotiated independently. ASAP protects the airline from federal fines as much as it protects us from disciplinary measures.
#33
Have to waive the @%&* flag on this one, Albie.
ASAP is a safety program that has been instituted at many airlines prior to FedEx outside of negotiations for monetary items. If it was a quid pro quo here, then shame on you guys for trading away fair compensation for a safety program that should have been negotiated independently. ASAP protects the airline from federal fines as much as it protects us from disciplinary measures.
ASAP is a safety program that has been instituted at many airlines prior to FedEx outside of negotiations for monetary items. If it was a quid pro quo here, then shame on you guys for trading away fair compensation for a safety program that should have been negotiated independently. ASAP protects the airline from federal fines as much as it protects us from disciplinary measures.
how willing do any of us think that FedEx (the company side) was to negotiate the implementation of this kind of safety program AT ALL - let alone outside a "quid pro quo" scenario? and just hand over ASAP on a silver platter "in the interests of Safety First"?
how willing have they been up until now to release the full findings of the Enders Report "in the interests of Safety First"?
(hint: not at all willing - in either case - see any trends there?)
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
any single item that is negotiated (ASAP program for example) requires BOTH sides of the negotiation to be willing to negotiate.
how willing do any of us think that FedEx (the company side) was to negotiate the implementation of this kind of safety program AT ALL - let alone outside a "quid pro quo" scenario? and just hand over ASAP on a silver platter "in the interests of Safety First"?
how willing have they been up until now to release the full findings of the Enders Report "in the interests of Safety First"?
(hint: not at all willing - in either case - see any trends there?)
how willing do any of us think that FedEx (the company side) was to negotiate the implementation of this kind of safety program AT ALL - let alone outside a "quid pro quo" scenario? and just hand over ASAP on a silver platter "in the interests of Safety First"?
how willing have they been up until now to release the full findings of the Enders Report "in the interests of Safety First"?
(hint: not at all willing - in either case - see any trends there?)
#35
Here's a link to the FAA's webpage titled Safety: Safety Management System (SMS): Aviation Safety - Safety Management System (SMS)
ARC ... NPRM ... we've heard those acronymns before ... Aviation Rulemaking Committee ... Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ...
At about the same time that we opened our CBA for RLA Section 6 negotiations, the FAA issued an NPRM which would require all Part 121 Certificate holders to implement a Safety Management System, which would include LOSA (which we already had), ASAP, FOQA, and FRMS (that's Fatigue Risk Management System). It's funny that where we had a place for ASAP in our 2006 CBA, we had fought The Company ever since then for a program which would not put pilots at risk for participating. Then, with the NPRM looming over their heads, they magically became cooperative in establishing all three programs required to complete the SMS required by the FAA's NPRM. But, where did that NPRM come from? Did it just materialize out of thin air? No, Congress acted.
Here's a quote from one of those NPRMs:
The Airline Safety and Federal Aviation Extension Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-216) directed the FAA to issue an NPRM within 90 days of enactment of the Act, and a final rule by July 30, 2012. The Act requires the FAA to develop and implement an SMS for all part 121 air carriers.
That's why we have ASAP (nad FOQA and FRMS) -- not because we persuaded The Company to give it to us in a quid pro quo negotiation at the table..
#38
#39
Actually, if you look at the top tier currently in the captain seat, many have down bid. So I wouldn't put it past some of them, but hopefully this is a joke and I won't move down in seniority. But of course, they are allowed to excercise their seniority rights.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post