Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Huge Posting Fedex

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2013, 09:03 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Albief15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 2,889
Default

3 % a year, improvements to FDA, and ASAP.

How much do you think ASAP is worth to the crew of the Denver tailstrike? I suspect they are glad its in place, and the value to them is priceless.

For those who say we were getting that anyway, I point out EFBs in every jet, ipad for all pilots, and FAA flight time/duty time improvements were all on the calendar or were proposed too...and we still do not have them. The pragmatic approach may have just saved some careers. Anyone who has used ASAP in the last 2 years and avoided enforcement action will probably say they got a bit more than just a 3% raise....
Albief15 is offline  
Old 01-29-2013, 06:17 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: MD-11
Posts: 395
Default

Originally Posted by Albief15
3 % a year, improvements to FDA, and ASAP.

How much do you think ASAP is worth to the crew of the Denver tailstrike? I suspect they are glad its in place, and the value to them is priceless.

For those who say we were getting that anyway, I point out EFBs in every jet, ipad for all pilots, and FAA flight time/duty time improvements were all on the calendar or were proposed too...and we still do not have them. The pragmatic approach may have just saved some careers. Anyone who has used ASAP in the last 2 years and avoided enforcement action will probably say they got a bit more than just a 3% raise....
Have to waive the @%&* flag on this one, Albie.

ASAP is a safety program that has been instituted at many airlines prior to FedEx outside of negotiations for monetary items. If it was a quid pro quo here, then shame on you guys for trading away fair compensation for a safety program that should have been negotiated independently. ASAP protects the airline from federal fines as much as it protects us from disciplinary measures.
PicklePausePull is offline  
Old 01-29-2013, 09:13 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AFW_MD11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD11 FO, ANC
Posts: 1,098
Default

Originally Posted by PicklePausePull
Have to waive the @%&* flag on this one, Albie.

ASAP is a safety program that has been instituted at many airlines prior to FedEx outside of negotiations for monetary items. If it was a quid pro quo here, then shame on you guys for trading away fair compensation for a safety program that should have been negotiated independently. ASAP protects the airline from federal fines as much as it protects us from disciplinary measures.
any single item that is negotiated (ASAP program for example) requires BOTH sides of the negotiation to be willing to negotiate.

how willing do any of us think that FedEx (the company side) was to negotiate the implementation of this kind of safety program AT ALL - let alone outside a "quid pro quo" scenario? and just hand over ASAP on a silver platter "in the interests of Safety First"?

how willing have they been up until now to release the full findings of the Enders Report "in the interests of Safety First"?

(hint: not at all willing - in either case - see any trends there?)
AFW_MD11 is offline  
Old 01-29-2013, 09:55 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by AFW_MD11
any single item that is negotiated (ASAP program for example) requires BOTH sides of the negotiation to be willing to negotiate.

how willing do any of us think that FedEx (the company side) was to negotiate the implementation of this kind of safety program AT ALL - let alone outside a "quid pro quo" scenario? and just hand over ASAP on a silver platter "in the interests of Safety First"?

how willing have they been up until now to release the full findings of the Enders Report "in the interests of Safety First"?

(hint: not at all willing - in either case - see any trends there?)
As part of the "Just Culture" that we now enjoy...I'm "absolutely, positively" sure that they would have instituted an ASAP, without us having to pay for it in $$.
Busboy is offline  
Old 01-29-2013, 11:23 AM
  #35  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by AFW_MD11

how willing do any of us think that FedEx (the company side) was to negotiate the implementation of this kind of safety program AT ALL - let alone outside a "quid pro quo" scenario?

As our MEC Chairman is always quick to point out, there's the other negotiation, the one taking place in Washington, D.C.

Here's a link to the FAA's webpage titled Safety: Safety Management System (SMS): Aviation Safety - Safety Management System (SMS)

ARC ... NPRM ... we've heard those acronymns before ... Aviation Rulemaking Committee ... Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ...

At about the same time that we opened our CBA for RLA Section 6 negotiations, the FAA issued an NPRM which would require all Part 121 Certificate holders to implement a Safety Management System, which would include LOSA (which we already had), ASAP, FOQA, and FRMS (that's Fatigue Risk Management System). It's funny that where we had a place for ASAP in our 2006 CBA, we had fought The Company ever since then for a program which would not put pilots at risk for participating. Then, with the NPRM looming over their heads, they magically became cooperative in establishing all three programs required to complete the SMS required by the FAA's NPRM. But, where did that NPRM come from? Did it just materialize out of thin air? No, Congress acted.

Here's a quote from one of those NPRMs:
The Airline Safety and Federal Aviation Extension Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-216) directed the FAA to issue an NPRM within 90 days of enactment of the Act, and a final rule by July 30, 2012. The Act requires the FAA to develop and implement an SMS for all part 121 air carriers.
That's why we have ASAP (nad FOQA and FRMS) -- not because we persuaded The Company to give it to us in a quid pro quo negotiation at the table.







.
TonyC is offline  
Old 01-29-2013, 12:27 PM
  #36  
Proponent of Hysteria
 
FXDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 3B
Posts: 1,052
Default

First practice bid is out. No secondaries, no surprise.
FXDX is offline  
Old 01-29-2013, 12:37 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,237
Default

No secondaries. None.

Airbus, MD11 and 777 are all going to stop training in March?
Huck is offline  
Old 01-29-2013, 12:42 PM
  #38  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by FXDX

First practice bid is out. No secondaries, no surprise.

10 Captains and 9 FOs are downbidding from wide-bodies? Yeahright.


Practice bids are a joke.




Literally.






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 01-29-2013, 01:00 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Overnitefr8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 767 CA
Posts: 1,876
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC
10 Captains and 9 FOs are downbidding from wide-bodies? Yeahright.


Practice bids are a joke.




Literally.






.
Actually, if you look at the top tier currently in the captain seat, many have down bid. So I wouldn't put it past some of them, but hopefully this is a joke and I won't move down in seniority. But of course, they are allowed to excercise their seniority rights.
Overnitefr8 is offline  
Old 01-29-2013, 01:01 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,804
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC


Practice bids are a joke.


.

And why would 727 guys bid off when they will probably have the summer off, if not longer? Only thing I can think of is they can't live on 68 hours BLG.
USMCFDX is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SWAjet
Major
8
01-01-2020 12:25 PM
vagabond
Cargo
4
12-14-2010 06:03 AM
bifff15
Cargo
12
06-03-2008 10:06 AM
Sasquatch
Cargo
3
11-30-2005 07:42 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-05-2005 04:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices